The Therapeutic Effects of Equine-Assisted Psychotherapy (EAP)
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04200612 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : December 16, 2019
Last Update Posted : March 3, 2021
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Aggression Stress Psychopathy Empathy | Behavioral: Equine-Assisted Psychotherapy Behavioral: Equine-Assisted Activities Other: Placebo-control group | Not Applicable |

Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 102 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Intervention Model Description: | The design of the experiment will be a single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Participants are randomly assigned to either an intervention group, an active-control group or a placebo-control group. Participants in the intervention group will go through the 5-week EAP program consisting of the clinical processing following some activities found in EAP manuals. Participants in the active-control group will undergo a 5-week program that only involves interactions with horses without any clinical input (i.e. commonly coined as animal-assisted activities). Participants in the placebo-control group will undergo a 5-week movie screening of 1 hour each session that is related to horses in the lab. |
Masking: | Single (Participant) |
Masking Description: | Participants are informed that they will be randomly assigned to either a EAP horse interaction group or a EAP horse movie group. They are told that this study is meant to investigate the outcomes of two different types of EAP. In actuality, there are 3 groups in total - one intervention and two control groups. Participants in the intervention and active-control group will be told that they are in the EAP horse interaction group whereas participants in the placebo-control group are told that they are in the EAP horse movie group. |
Primary Purpose: | Other |
Official Title: | The Therapeutic Effects of Equine-Assisted Psychotherapy on Lowering Aggression Levels Through an Increase of Emotion Regulation |
Actual Study Start Date : | January 20, 2020 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | April 9, 2020 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | November 6, 2020 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Intervention Group
Participants in the intervention group will go through the 5-week EAP program consisting of the clinical processing following some activities found in EAP manuals.
|
Behavioral: Equine-Assisted Psychotherapy
Equine-Assisted Psychotherapy (EAP) involves working on the psychological goals set between the client and the mental health professional. This is done through the experiential interactions between the clients and the horse. This experiential aspect is vital as it allows clients to process the emotions, thoughts and behaviors that were expressed during sessions with the horse.
Other Name: Equine-Facilitated Psychotherapy Behavioral: Equine-Assisted Activities Simple interactions with the horses that does not necessarily involve any goals being set between the client and the personnel handling the session. These can involve activities such as grooming or petting of the horse. |
Active Comparator: Active-control group
Participants in the active-control group will undergo a 5-week program that only involves interactions with horses without any clinical input (i.e. commonly coined as animal-assisted activities).
|
Behavioral: Equine-Assisted Activities
Simple interactions with the horses that does not necessarily involve any goals being set between the client and the personnel handling the session. These can involve activities such as grooming or petting of the horse. |
Placebo Comparator: Placebo-control group
Participants in the placebo-control group will undergo a 5-week movie screening of 1 hour each session that is related to horses.
|
Other: Placebo-control group
This group will only be watching movies related to horses and they are told that this is another form of EAP even though this is not the case. This type of intervention has not been known to provide any therapeutic effect relevant to the study and thus is used as the placebo-control. |
- Young Adult Behavioral Scale (YABS) [ Time Frame: Immediately before the 1st intervention session ]Min. Value: 1 (never), Max. Value: 5 (always), higher scores indicate a higher likelihood in the domains of relational aggression, social aggression and interpersonal maturity.
- Young Adult Behavioral Scale (YABS) [ Time Frame: Immediately after the 3rd intervention session ]Min. Value: 1 (never), Max. Value: 5 (always), higher scores indicate a higher likelihood in the domains of relational aggression, social aggression and interpersonal maturity.
- Young Adult Behavioral Scale (YABS) [ Time Frame: Immediately after the 5th intervention session ]Min. Value: 1 (never), Max. Value: 5 (always), higher scores indicate a higher likelihood in the domains of relational aggression, social aggression and interpersonal maturity.
- Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPQ) [ Time Frame: Immediately before the 1st intervention session ]Min. Value: 0 (never), Max. Value: 2 (often), higher scores indicate higher general aggression levels
- Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPQ) [ Time Frame: Immediately after the 3rd intervention session ]Min. Value: 0 (never), Max. Value: 2 (often), higher scores indicate higher general aggression levels
- Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPQ) [ Time Frame: Immediately after the 5th intervention session ]Min. Value: 0 (never), Max. Value: 2 (often), higher scores indicate higher general aggression levels
- Depression Anxiety Stress Scale - 21 items (DASS-21) [ Time Frame: Immediately before the 1st intervention session ]Min. Value: 0 (did not apply to me at all), Max. Value: 3 (applied to me very much, or most of the time), higher scores indicate poorer emotional well-being
- Depression Anxiety Stress Scale - 21 items (DASS-21) [ Time Frame: Immediately after the 3rd intervention session ]Min. Value: 0 (did not apply to me at all), Max. Value: 3 (applied to me very much, or most of the time), higher scores indicate poorer emotional well-being
- Depression Anxiety Stress Scale - 21 items (DASS-21) [ Time Frame: Immediately after the 5th intervention session ]Min. Value: 0 (did not apply to me at all), Max. Value: 3 (applied to me very much, or most of the time), higher scores indicate poorer emotional well-being
- Motivated strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) [ Time Frame: Immediately before the 1st intervention session ]Min. Value: 1 (not at all true of me), Max. Value: 7 (very true of me), higher scores indicate greater motivations to learn using the different strategies
- Motivated strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) [ Time Frame: Immediately after the 3rd intervention session ]Min. Value: 1 (not at all true of me), Max. Value: 7 (very true of me), higher scores indicate greater motivations to learn using the different strategies
- Motivated strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) [ Time Frame: Immediately after the 5th intervention session ]Min. Value: 1 (not at all true of me), Max. Value: 7 (very true of me), higher scores indicate greater motivations to learn using the different strategies
- Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) [ Time Frame: Immediately before the 1st intervention session ]Min. Value: 1 (strongly disagree), Max. Value: 7 (strongly agree), higher scores indicate greater likelihood of using the two types of emotion regulation strategies
- Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) [ Time Frame: Immediately after the 3rd intervention session ]Min. Value: 1 (strongly disagree), Max. Value: 7 (strongly agree), higher scores indicate greater likelihood of using the two types of emotion regulation strategies
- Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) [ Time Frame: Immediately after the 5th intervention session ]Min. Value: 1 (strongly disagree), Max. Value: 7 (strongly agree), higher scores indicate greater likelihood of using the two types of emotion regulation strategies
- Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form (DERS-SF) [ Time Frame: Immediately before the 1st intervention session ]Min. Value: 1 (almost never), Max. Value: 5 (almost always), higher scores indicate greater difficulties with emotion regulation
- Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form (DERS-SF) [ Time Frame: Immediately after the 3rd intervention session ]Min. Value: 1 (almost never), Max. Value: 5 (almost always), higher scores indicate greater difficulties with emotion regulation
- Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form (DERS-SF) [ Time Frame: Immediately after the 5th intervention session ]Min. Value: 1 (almost never), Max. Value: 5 (almost always), higher scores indicate greater difficulties with emotion regulation
- Self-Report Psychotherapy - Short Form (SRP-SF) [ Time Frame: Immediately before the 1st intervention session ]Min. Value: 1 (strongly disagree), Max. Value: 5 (strongly agree), higher scores indicate higher levels of psychopathy
- Self-Report Psychotherapy - Short Form (SRP-SF) [ Time Frame: Immediately after the 3rd intervention session ]Min. Value: 1 (strongly disagree), Max. Value: 5 (strongly agree), higher scores indicate higher levels of psychopathy
- Self-Report Psychotherapy - Short Form (SRP-SF) [ Time Frame: Immediately after the 5th intervention session ]Min. Value: 1 (strongly disagree), Max. Value: 5 (strongly agree), higher scores indicate higher levels of psychopathy
- Cognitive, Affective and Somatic Empathy Scales (CASES) [ Time Frame: Immediately before the 1st intervention session ]Min. Value: 0 (rarely), Max. Value: 2 (often), higher scores indicate higher levels of empathy
- Cognitive, Affective and Somatic Empathy Scales (CASES) [ Time Frame: Immediately after the 3rd intervention session ]Min. Value: 0 (rarely), Max. Value: 2 (often), higher scores indicate higher levels of empathy
- Cognitive, Affective and Somatic Empathy Scales (CASES) [ Time Frame: Immediately after the 5th intervention session ]Min. Value: 0 (rarely), Max. Value: 2 (often), higher scores indicate higher levels of empathy
- Trail Making Task - Part B (TMT - Part B) [ Time Frame: Immediately before the 1st intervention session ]Unit of measure: Reaction Time (s), higher scores indicate higher levels of executive functioning, more specific to attention span and attentional task switching abilities
- Trail Making Task - Part B (TMT - Part B) [ Time Frame: Immediately after the 3rd intervention session ]Unit of measure: Reaction Time (s), higher scores indicate higher levels of executive functioning, more specific to attention span and attentional task switching abilities
- Trail Making Task - Part B (TMT - Part B) [ Time Frame: Immediately after the 5th intervention session ]Unit of measure: Reaction Time (s), higher scores indicate higher levels of executive functioning, more specific to attention span and attentional task switching abilities

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 28 Years (Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Do not have any medical allergies or discomfort from interaction with horses.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants who self-report an existing diagnosis for a psychological disorder as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition: DSM-V

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04200612
Singapore | |
Therapeutic and Educational Riding in Singapore | |
Singapore, Singapore, 286965 |
Principal Investigator: | Olivia Choy, PhD | Nanyang Technological University | |
Principal Investigator: | Lim SM Matthew, PhD, PsyD | National University of Singapore |
Responsible Party: | Chua Yi Rong Shawn, Co-Investigator, National University of Singapore |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT04200612 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
S-19-357 |
First Posted: | December 16, 2019 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | March 3, 2021 |
Last Verified: | March 2021 |
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
Plan to Share IPD: | No |
Plan Description: | There is no plans for such sharing as of now. |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
Equine-Assisted Psychotherapy Emotion Regulation Aggression Outcomes Randomized-Controlled Trials |
Aggression Behavioral Symptoms |