High Definition Colonoscopy (HDC) vs. Dye Spraying Chromo-colonoscopy (DSC) in Screening Patients With Long-standing Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04191655|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : December 10, 2019
Last Update Posted : June 29, 2020
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) involving the colon is a known risk for colon cancer. There are two standards-of-care colonoscopy techniques used for screening all patients who suffer from IBD for more than eight years. One method is to obtain random biopsies throughout the colon and the other is by using dye spraying chromo-colonoscopy.
This trial aims to study the difference between the two colonoscopy techniques during the era of high definition camera in detecting neoplastic lesions during screening patients with long-standing IBD.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Colon Dysplasia Ulcerative Colitis Crohn Colitis Indeterminate Colitis||Device: High Definition Colonoscopy Device: Dye Spraying Chromocolonoscopy||Not Applicable|
Is High Definition White Light Colonoscopy (HDWLC) not inferior to Dye Spraying Chromo-colonoscopy (DSC) in detecting all neoplastic lesions during screening patients with colonic IBD for more than eight years?
Study setting: The study will be conducted at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Patients will be randomized to HDWLC with biopsies every 10 cm versus DSC.
Study population: Adult patients colonic IBD for more than eight years.
Recruitment The study team will conduct a day by day chart review for all patients with a history of inflammatory bowel disease who were scheduled for screening colonoscopy and find candidates who meet the eligibility criteria. A study team member will meet with the potential candidates during their visit to the gastroenterology procedure room before having their colonoscopy and offer them to participate in the study.
Procedures: Participants will undergo either HDWLC with biopsies every 10 cm or DSC based on the randomization. Both procedures are standard of care and are being done at BIDMC before starting this study. All the endoscopists are IBD specialists with expertise in both procedures. All physicians were given a review article and video of chromoendoscopy to further standardize practice. The clinicians who are conducting the HDWLC are allowed to do a targeted DSC if required as per hospital protocol. Both arms of the study are using high definition Olympus colonoscopes
Study design: A randomized controlled, noninferiority trial.
Existing literatures suggest that the detection rate of the DSC arm is 20%. The investigators set 10% as the non-inferiority margin. With a total of 400 subjects (200 in each arm), the study will have 80% power to detect non-inferiority with the type I error rate controlled at 0.05. To account for a potential 25% data attribution, the study team will enroll 500 subjects.
The baseline characteristics of the two trial arms will first be tabulated for potential imbalance in variables. Continuous variables will be summarized by typical parameters such as mean, standard deviation and range and compared using two-sample T-test (if the normality assumption holds) or Wilcoxon rank-sum test (if the normality assumption does not hold). Normality of distribution will be determined using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit test. Categorical data will be summarized by frequency and percentage and analyzed using the Chi-square or Fishers exact test, as appropriate.
The primary outcome will be compared using Z-test based on normal approximation of the sample proportions.
Primary outcome analysis: Intention to treat Secondary outcome analysis: Per protocol analysis.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||500 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Intervention Model Description:||After patients consent to participate to the study, they will be randomized 1:1 by one of the study members who is blinded to the patient's history to either High Definition White Light Colonoscopy with biopsies every 10 cm or Dye Spraying Chromocolonoscopy. The gastroenterologist will be informed about the randomization result and s/he will conduct the procedure.|
|Masking:||Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)|
In this study, we will randomize a total of 500 participants into two arms: A. high definition white light colonoscopy with biopsy (n=250) or B. chromocolonoscopy (n=250).
The randomization schedule was created by using GraphPad website. Then sealed opaque envelopes which numbered from 1 to 500 for all subjects were created based on the randomization schedules by one of the study co-investigators (Mohammed El-Dallal MD). These envelopes will be opened only by the endoscopy provider once the subject agrees and sings the informed consent. Of note, the randomization schedules will be saved in a separate document that only Mohammed El-Dallal MD has access to it. Neither the participants nor the study members (other than Mohammed El-Dallal MD) know about the assignment before opening the envelopes.
|Official Title:||High Definition Colonoscopy (HDC) vs. Dye Spraying Chromo-colonoscopy (DSC) in Screening Patients With Long-standing Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)|
|Actual Study Start Date :||April 3, 2019|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||October 2021|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||December 2021|
|Experimental: High Definition White Light Colonoscopy||
Device: High Definition Colonoscopy
A colonoscopy that used high definition (HD) camera
|Active Comparator: Dye Spraying Chromo-colonoscopy||
Device: Dye Spraying Chromocolonoscopy
A colonoscopy that used high definition camera in addition to dye spraying on the interior colon surface.
- Detection rate of dysplastic lesions in High Definition White Light Colonoscopy versus Dye Spraying Chromo-colonoscopy [ Time Frame: Immediately after the procedure ]
- Detection rate of Adenoma in both groups. [ Time Frame: Immediately after the procedure ]
- Detection rate of high-grade dysplasia in both groups. [ Time Frame: Immediately after the procedure ]
- Numbers of detected adenomas per patient. [ Time Frame: Immediately after the procedure ]
- Difference in withdrawal time to perform the procedure in both groups. [ Time Frame: Immediately after the procedure ]
- Difference in adverse event, mild (e.g.; nausea, vomiting, or abdominal pain that necessitate phone call from the patient to the provider, or sever (e.g.; GI bleeding, perforation, hospitalization after the procedure) for each arm. [ Time Frame: Within one week from the procedure date ]
- Number of targeted chromoendoscopies [ Time Frame: Immediately after the procedure ]
- Appropriateness of reported follow up recommendations per standard guideline recommendations [ Time Frame: Immediately after the procedure ]
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04191655
|Contact: Mohammed El-Dallal, MDemail@example.com|
|Contact: Joseph Feuerstein MD, MDfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|United States, Massachusetts|
|Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center||Recruiting|
|Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215|
|Contact: Joseph Feuerstein MD 617-407-9227 email@example.com|
|Principal Investigator: Joseph Feuerstein MD|