Beliefs and Attitudes for Successful Implementation in Schools (BASIS)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03791281|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : January 2, 2019
Last Update Posted : January 2, 2019
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Intervention Adoption Implementation||Behavioral: BASIS Behavioral: Attention Control||Not Applicable|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||35 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Primary Purpose:||Health Services Research|
|Official Title:||Beliefs and Attitudes for Successful Implementation in Schools (BASIS)|
|Actual Study Start Date :||August 15, 2016|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||July 31, 2018|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||July 31, 2018|
Received a 3-hour BASIS implementation strategy.
Active Comparator: Attention Control
Received a 3-hour session designed to control for dose, information provided, and presenter effects.
Behavioral: Attention Control
- Change in Attitudes toward Evidence-Based Practices [ Time Frame: Pre-intervention/baseline, post-intervention (1-2 weeks), 4-month follow-up ]Evidence-Based Practice Attitudes Scale (EBPAS) is a widely used 26-item tool designed to assess evidence-based practice (EBP) attitudes with items measured on a 0-4 scale and 6 subscales: (1) likelihood of adopting if the EBP were a requirement; (2) likelihood of adopting if the EBP were appealing to you; (3) openness to new practices; (4) perceived divergence between current practices and EBPs; (5) fit of EBPs with current practices; and (6) burden of EBPs. Subscale and total scores are mean scores of items with a range of 0-4. Higher scores reflect more favorable attitudes (perceived divergence is reverse-coded).
- Change in Subjective Norms [ Time Frame: Pre-intervention/baseline, post-intervention (1-2 weeks), 4-month follow-up ]Subjective Norms Scale is based on Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) constructs. Two subscales measure two types implementation-related subjective norms: injunctive norms and descriptive norms. Four items load on each subscale and mean score range from -3 to +3, with positive scores reflecting more positive subjective injunctive and descriptive norms.
- Change in Perceived Behavioral Control [ Time Frame: Pre-intervention/baseline, post-intervention (1-2 weeks), 4-month follow-up ]Perceived Behavioral Control Scale is a modified version of the Teacher's Self-Efficacy Scale, which has 10 items assessing perceived behavioral control in implementing evidence-based practices. Items are scored on a 1-4 scale with a total mean score ranging from 1-4. Higher scores reflect greater (i.e., more favorable) perceived behavioral control.
- Change in School Implementation Citizenship Behaviors [ Time Frame: Pre-intervention/baseline, post-intervention (1-2 weeks), 4-month follow-up ]The School Implementation Citizenship Behaviors Scale (S-ICBS) includes 15 items and measures clinicians' perceptions of how school staff engage with evidence-based practices in their specific school context. There are 4 subscales: (1) helping others; (2) keeping informed; (3) taking initiative; and (4) advocacy. Subscale and total scores are mean scores of items with a range of 0-4. Higher scores reflect greater (i.e., more favorable) implementation citizenship behavior.
- Change in Intentions to Implement [ Time Frame: Pre-intervention/baseline, post-intervention (1-2 weeks), 4-month follow-up ]The Modified Intentions to Use Scale has 9 items assessing school mental health providers' intentions to implement evidence-based practices. A total mean score is computed with a range of 0-4 and higher scores indicate more favorable intentions. Two versions of this scale were administered. At baseline, all providers were asked about general intentions to implement evidence-based practices. After training, clinicians were asked about intentions to implement the specific intervention for which they had received training.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03791281
|United States, Washington|
|University of Washington School Mental Health Assessment, Research, and Training (SMART) Center|
|Seattle, Washington, United States, 98115-8160|
|Principal Investigator:||Aaron R Lyon, PhD||University of Washington|