Lateral Episiotomy or Not in Vacuum Assisted Delivery in Non-parous Women (EVA)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02643108|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : December 30, 2015
Last Update Posted : October 8, 2020
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Pelvic Floor Disorders Fecal Incontinence Dystocia Fetal Hypoxia||Procedure: Lateral episiotomy||Not Applicable|
The study has started at Danderyd Hospital. Danderyd Hospital is a large teaching hospital affiliated to the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden. South General Hospital in Stockholm, Uppsala University Hospital, Falun Hospital, Helsingborg Hospital, Växjö Hospital, Umeå University Hospital, and Gothenburg University Hospital Östra have joined the trial 2017-2019.
Informed consent is collected from nulliparous women with a singelton, live fetus in cephalic presentation, with a planned vaginal delivery and without previous gynecological surgery due to incontinence or genital prolapse. Women can be approached at any time from gestational week 18 until delivery, unless they are in severe pain or discomfort, there is not enough time to consider the information, or any other reason not to obtain consent. The informed consent form is kept at the receiving research department and a note of consent/no consent is made in the obstetric medical file.
At indication for vacuum extraction, the patient's consent is confirmed verbally and allocation is made by sealed opaque envelopes on the vacuum extraction equipment mobile cart. Randomization is performed 1:1 in random permuted blocks generated by an external organization (Karolinska Trial Alliance).
Lateral episiotomy is performed according to the intervention description. A reduction of OASIS from 12.4% to 6.2% can be detected with 80% power and less than 5% risk of alpha-error (p<0.05) with 354 women in each group using Chi-square test comparing two independent proportions in a two-sided test (3% missing outcome). A smaller reduction is clinically valuable, although the risk-benefit relationship between receiving a prophylactic episiotomy and the chance of an intact perineum may limit the feasibility of a larger trial in a setting with a restrictive episiotomy policy. We have obtained ethical approval to randomise a total of 1400 women, which enables us to detect a reduction in OASIS rate at VE from 12.4% to 7.8% (p<0.05). We will perform an interim analysis in order to exclude an unethically large difference (p<0.01) in primary outcome or serious adverse events at 350 randomized women.
Data is collected prospectively through Case Record Forms and the obstetric medical file Obstetrix (Cerner Sverige AB), which covers approximately 98% of deliveries with complete data, and the Swedish Pregnancy Register covering the whole of Sweden from 2015. Using a weblink, questionnaires from the national Perineal Tear Register, are sent out electronically for the follow-up of the study participants. In addition, questionnaires regarding birth satisfaction (BSS-R and CEQ 2.0) are sent at 8 weeks after delivery. Questionnaires regarding sexual function (FSFI and FSDS) and quality of life (Euro-QoL-5D) at delivery and after 12 months.
A follow-up from registers regarding mode of delivery and prevalence of episiotomy and OASIS in subsequent births will be performed at 5 years and 10 years after the index birth.
A substudy takes place in Stockholm, Uppsala, and Helsingborg, where included (randomized) women are examined at 6-12 months after delivery with 2D and 3D endovaginal and anal ultrasound to detect levator and sphincter injuries, measure episiotomy scars, establish POP-Q scores, and evaluate a new questionnaire for pelvic floor function after perineal tears.
Another substudy takes place in Stockholm and Falun, where women who have been asked for consent (both affirmative and non-affirmative responders) as well as midwives who have tried to obtain consent, are invited to a qualitative interview study to explore the recruitment experience of women and midwives.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||710 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Masking Description:||The allocation will be masked during statistical analyses.|
|Official Title:||Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Lateral Episiotomy Versus no Episiotomy in Vacuum Assisted Delivery in Non-parous Women|
|Actual Study Start Date :||June 30, 2017|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||December 31, 2022|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||December 31, 2030|
Experimental: Lateral episiotomy
Lateral episiotomy (left or right) is performed by the attending physician or assisting midwife at crowning of the fetal head in operative vaginal delivery by vacuum extraction. Regular manual perineal support is applied.
Procedure: Lateral episiotomy
When the woman is randomized to episiotomy, lateral episiotomy is performed with scissors on the left or right side of the vaginal opening. Origin of incision is 1.0 - 3.0 cm from the midline/posterior forchette and is cut 3.0 cm or more towards the ischial tuberosity at an angle of 60 degrees from the midline.
No Intervention: No episiotomy
No episiotomy is performed during operative vaginal delivery, unless vitally indicated (for example severe fetal distress). The woman may tear spontaneously. Regular manual perineal support is applied.
- Obstetric anal sphincter injury [ Time Frame: 1 hour ]Rupture or tear of the external and/or internal anal sphincter at any degree (third and fourth degree perineal tear); International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 O70.2 or O70.3.
- Other degree of perineal or vaginal tear [ Time Frame: 1 hour ]Rupture, tear or hematoma in the perineum or vagina; International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 O70.0, O70.1, O70.9, O71.4-9.
- Maternal blood loss at delivery [ Time Frame: 6 hours ]Estimated blood loss in milliliters through weighing of sheets and drapes during and up to 6 hours after delivery.
- Neonatal scalp injury [ Time Frame: 24 hours ]Prevalence (number of patients) of scalp injury to the neonate after instrumental delivery, such as open wounds, cephalic hematoma, subgaleal hematoma, and intracranial hemorrhage, according to diagnose by neonatologist.
- Pain experience [ Time Frame: 1 day, 8 weeks, 1 year ]VAS (0-10) estimated pain through questionnaire at baseline (first days post partum), 8 weeks and 12 months after delivery and at 8 weeks through questionnaires: number of days using analgetic medication.
- Birthing experience [ Time Frame: 8 weeks ]Questionnaire at 8 weeks after delivery regarding patient satisfaction using the Birth Satisfaction Scale Revised (short form) and the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0.
- Anal incontinence [ Time Frame: 8 weeks, 1 year, and 5 years ]Questionnaire at baseline, 8 weeks, 1 year, and 5 years after delivery through the Swedish Obstetrical Tear Register regarding anal continence function (Wexner score based).
- Sexual function [ Time Frame: 1 year and 5 years ]Questionnaire at baseline (first day post partum), 1 year, and 5 years after delivery through the Swedish Obstetrical Tear Register, as well as FSFI and FSDS Questionnaires.
- Pelvic organ prolapse symptoms [ Time Frame: 1 year and 5 years ]Questionnaire at baseline, 1 year, and 5 years after delivery through the Swedish Obstetrical Tear Register regarding symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse.
- Quality of life score [ Time Frame: 1 year and 5 years ]Assessment of quality of life by questionnaire at baseline, 1 year, and 5 years using the Euro-QoL-5D
- Mode of delivery in subsequent birth [ Time Frame: 5 years and 10 years ]Register data will be extracted from the Swedish Pregnancy Register.
- Prevalence of obstetric anal sphincter injury in subsequent birth [ Time Frame: 5 years and 10 years ]Register data will be extracted from the Swedish Pregnancy Register.
- Prevalence of episiotomy in subsequent birth [ Time Frame: 5 years and 10 years ]Register data will be extracted from the Swedish Pregnancy Register.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02643108
|Contact: Sophia Brismar Wendel, MD, PhDfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|Contact: Maria Persson, MD, PhDemail@example.com|
|Contact: Susanne Hesselman, MD, PhD 004623492000 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Östra Hospital Gothenburg University||Recruiting|
|Contact: Hanna Friberg, M.D. email@example.com|
|Contact: Åsa Leijonhufvud, MD, PhD 0046424062227 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Contact: Sophia Brismar Wendel, MD, PhD 0046722024895 email@example.com|
|Contact: Helen Fagraeus, Midwife 0046812355000 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Principal Investigator: Sophia Brismar Wendel, MD, PhD|
|Sub-Investigator: Sandra Bergendahl, MD|
|Sub-Investigator: Victoria Ankarcrona, MD|
|South General Hospital||Recruiting|
|Contact: Tove Wallström, MD, PhD 0046737058968 email@example.com|
|Umeå University Hospital||Recruiting|
|Contact: Anna-Karin Nilsson Wihlbäck, M.D, PhD. firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Uppsala University Hospital||Recruiting|
|Contact: Maria Jonsson, MD, Ass Prof 0046186115757 email@example.com|
|Contact: Emmie Rydström, M.D. firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Principal Investigator:||Sophia Brismar Wendel, MD, PhD||Karolinska Institutet Danderyd Hospital|