Preconditioning Shields Against Vascular Events in Surgery (SAVES-F)
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Critical Lower Limb Ischaemia
Procedure: Remote ischaemic preconditioning
|Study Design:||Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Prevention
|Official Title:||Preconditioning Shields Against Vascular Events in Surgery: A Multi-centre Feasibility Trial of Preconditioning Against Adverse Events in Major Vascular Surgery (Preconditioning-SAVES)|
- Serum troponin levels [ Time Frame: 3 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The trial is intended to pragmatically evaluate the potential of RIPC to improve clinical outcomes among patients undergoing major vascular surgery in routine clinical practice. For the pilot trial, a surrogate marker of efficacy will be used, namely serum troponin I levels. The primary efficacy outcome will be a comparison of the proportion of patients in each arm of the trial who develop a serum troponin level in excess of the upper limit of normal in the first three post-operative days.
- Composite Major Adverse Clinical Events [ Time Frame: 30 day ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The primary endpoint for the trial will be Major Adverse Clinical Events. This is a composite endpoint comprising any of: cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, new onset arrhythmia requiring treatment, cardiac arrest, congestive cardiac failure, cerebrovascular accident, renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy, mesenteric ischaemia requiring intervention or biopsy proven ischaemic colitis, urgent cardiac revascularisation. All participants will undergo a serum troponin levels and 12-lead electrocardiogram on the second post-operative day to screen for silent peri-operative myocardial infarction. Trial ECGs and troponin levels will be interpreted by a blinded trial cardiologist.
- Duration of post-operative hospital stay [ Time Frame: 30 day ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The duration of hospital stay and ITU stay have a major impact on health service resource utilisation, and are factors which can be influenced by surgery.
- Duration of intensive care unit stay [ Time Frame: 30 day ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The duration of hospital stay and ITU stay have a major impact on health service resource utilisation, and are factors which can be influenced by surgery.
- Unplanned critical care unit admission [ Time Frame: 30 day ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The duration of hospital stay and ITU stay have a major impact on health service resource utilisation, and are factors which can be influenced by surgery.
- Acute kidney injury score in first three peri-operative days [ Time Frame: 3 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The Acute Kidney Injury Score will be calculated over the first three peri-operative days. Creatinine will be measured daily as part of routine care. Urine volumes will be calculated from the fluid balance charts maintained as part of usual care.
- Post-operative complications [ Time Frame: 30 day ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Postoperative complications will be recorded and results from both groups compared.
- Mortality [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Death within one year of surgery will be determined by contacting the patient's general practitioner.
- Cardiac or cerebral event [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Major adverse cardiac or cerebral event (myocardial infarction, cardiac death, cerebrovascular accident) within 1 year of surgery will be determined by contacting the patient's general practitioner for details.
- Acute upper limb ischaemia [ Time Frame: 24 hours post-operatively ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Acute upper limb ischaemia - This is defined as the development of ischaemia in the arm used for the preconditioning stimulus requiring systemic anti-coagulation, radiological intervention or surgical intervention. The arm will be assessed at the end of surgery to identify if ischaemia is present.
- Acute upper limb deep vein thrombosis [ Time Frame: 10 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Acute upper limb deep vein thrombosis - This is defined as the development of thrombus within the subclavian, axillary or brachial vein, which may develop up to 10 days post procedure, confirmed in duplex ultrasound and in the same arm as used for the RIPC stimulus.
- Serial troponin I results [ Time Frame: 3 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A comparison of the area under the curve of serial troponin I
- Acceptability of RIPC to patients [ Time Frame: 6 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]For patients, particularly those undergoing regional anaesthesia rather than general, the intervention may be burdensome and uncomfortable which may negatively impact upon likely adoption of this intervention into routine practice.In order to explore these potential issues, this feasibility trial will include a qualitative evaluation of acceptability to patients together with a qualitative evaluation of any perceived barriers to implementation. This evaluation will take the form of a semi-structured phone interview.
- Acceptability and barriers to implementation among healthcare professionals. [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Healthcare professionals at participating practices will be asked to complete a self-administered electronic questionnaire at the end of the study period. The questionnaire will elicit data on profession and practice details, their perceived experience of trial involvement, and open-ended questions to elicit information regarding attitudes to trial involvement, willingness to recruit participants, difficulties that arose during the trial and potential barriers to further research or routine clinical use of the trial intervention.
|Study Start Date:||April 2014|
|Estimated Study Completion Date:||August 2017|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date:||April 2016 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
Experimental: Remote ischaemic preconditioning
Remote ischaemic preconditioning will be performed in the same manner as several previous trials. Immediately after induction of anaesthesia, a standard, CE-approved blood pressure cuff will be placed around one arm of the patient. It will then be inflated to a pressure of 200mmHg for 5 minutes. For patients with a systolic blood pressure >185mmHg, the cuff will be inflated to at least 15mmHg above the patient's systolic blood pressure. The cuff will then be deflated and the arm allowed reperfuse for 5 minutes. This will be repeated so that each patient receives a total of 4 ischaemia-reperfusion cycles. In all other respects, the procedure and peri-operative care will follow the routine practices of the surgeons and anaesthetists involved.
Procedure: Remote ischaemic preconditioning
Ischaemic preconditioning is a phenomenon whereby a brief period of non-lethal ischaemia in a tissue renders it resistant to the effects of a subsequent much longer ischaemic insult. Remote ischaemic preconditioning works on the theory that brief ischaemia in one tissue could confer protection on distant organs.
Other Name: RIPC
No Intervention: Control to remote preconditioning group
Patients randomised to this group will receive routine pre-operative, peri-operative and post operative care.
The demand for major vascular surgery is increasing . Patients requiring procedures such as aortic aneurysm repair, carotid endarterectomy, lower limb surgical re-vascularisation and major lower limb amputation for end-stage vascular disease constitute a high-risk surgical cohort. Peri-operative complications such as myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, renal failure and death are common [2,3]. Multiple potential mechanisms may result in these complications. For example, myocardial injury may result from systemic hypotension leading to reduced flow across a tight coronary artery stenosis or, alternatively, it may arise due to acute occlusion when an unstable plaque ruptures. Most strategies aimed at peri-operative risk reduction target a single potential mechanism. For example, beta-blockade may prevent myocardial injury due to overwork, but cannot prevent acute coronary occlusion. There is a requirement for a simple, effective intervention that protects tissues against injury via multiple different mechanisms. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) may be suitable.
Ischemic preconditioning is a phenomenon whereby a brief period of non-lethal ischemia in a tissue renders it resistant to the effects of a subsequent much longer ischaemic insult. It was first described in the canine heart . Subsequent clinical trials showed that ischemic preconditioning reduced heart muscle damage following coronary artery bypass grafting  and liver dysfunction following hepatic resection . Following cardiac surgery, it is associated with a reduction in critical care stay, arrhythmias and inotrope use . However, ischemic preconditioning requires direct interference with the target tissues' blood supply, limiting its clinical utility. Further experimental work suggested that brief ischemia in one tissue, such as the kidneys, could confer protection on distant organs such as the heart . A similar effect was observed after transient skeletal muscle ischemia [9-11]. This effect is referred to as 'preconditioning at a distance' or 'remote ischemic preconditioning' (RIPC).
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02097186
|Contact: Stewart R Walsh, MCh FRCS||00353 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Contact: Mary Clarke Moloney, PhDemail@example.com|
|Cork University Hospital||Not yet recruiting|
|Cork, Ireland, 000|
|Contact: Greg Fulton firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Principal Investigator: Greg Fulton|
|Sub-Investigator: Brian Manning|
|Dublin, Ireland, 000|
|Contact: Darragh Moneley 0035301809 3092|
|Principal Investigator: Darragh Moneley|
|Sub-Investigator: Austin Leahy|
|St James's Hospital||Recruiting|
|Dublin, Ireland, 000|
|Contact: Prakash Madhavan email@example.com|
|Principal Investigator: Prakash Madhavan|
|Sub-Investigator: Zenia Martin|
|Sub-Investigator: Dermot Moore|
|Sub-Investigator: Sean O'Neill|
|University Hospital Galway||Recruiting|
|Galway, Ireland, 00|
|Contact: Stewart R Walsh STEWARTREDMOND.WALSH@nuigalway.ie|
|Principal Investigator: Stewart R Walsh|
|University Hospital Limerick (AKA MidWestern Regional Hospital)||Recruiting|
|Limerick, Ireland, 000|
|Contact: Mary Clarke Moloney, PhD 0035361482736 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Sub-Investigator: Mary Clarke Moloney, PhD.|
|Principal Investigator: Eamon Kavanagh|
|Sub-Investigator: Paul Burke|
|Waterford Regional Hospital||Recruiting|
|Waterford, Ireland, 000|
|Contact: Simon Cross|
|Principal Investigator: Simon Cross|
|Sub-Investigator: Joseph Dowdall|
|Principal Investigator:||Stewart R Walsh, Mch FRCS||Mid Western Regional Hospital and University of Limerick|