Trial of Methadone Maintenance Versus Methadone Detox in Jail
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01874964|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified December 2010 by The Miriam Hospital.
Recruitment status was: Active, not recruiting
First Posted : June 11, 2013
Last Update Posted : June 11, 2013
Methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) has been shown to be effective in reducing drug use, criminal activity and recidivism. Given this effectiveness, maintaining individuals who are enrolled in community MMT when committed to the Department of Corrections for short term incarceration would improve post release outcomes. However, this is rarely practiced in the United States. Current practice at the Rhode Island Department of Corrections is to detox inmates on methadone within 30 days of being incarcerated. More than 75% of these individuals are incarcerated for less than six months. The period immediately after release from incarceration is a particularly high-risk time for HIV and other problems including drug relapse and overdose.
The investigators hypothesize that inmates who are incarcerated for 6 months or less will have better outcomes and cost the state less money if they are maintained on their methadone dose and relinked to their community clinic at release, than the current practice of detoxification.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Opioid-Related Disorders||Behavioral: Methadone Maintenance Behavioral: Linkage to methadone maintenance||Not Applicable|
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of maintaining methadone treatment during short-term incarceration vs. methadone detoxification on continuing treatment post release, relapse, reducing HIV risk behaviors and reincarceration. Persons who inject opiates are at increased risk for HIV through both injection and sexual practices. A substantial proportion of opiate addicted persons are incarcerated and a majority of the nearly 8 million individuals released from a correctional setting each year have a history of addiction. The period immediately after release from incarceration is a particularly high-risk time for HIV and other problems including drug relapse and overdose. Methadone is the most widely used opiate replacement therapy in the United States. Despite its demonstrated benefit in decreasing drug use, criminal activity, and recidivism, some individuals on methadone treatment are reincarcerated each year. More than 75% of those individuals are incarcerated for less than six months. A program that maintains these individuals at a therapeutic dose increases the likelihood that they will successfully return to treatment upon release.
The following primary specific aims will drive this research:
- To determine the effect of maintaining methadone treatment during short-term incarceration vs. methadone detoxification on the time-to-post-release methadone treatment re-entry and relapse.
- To determine whether maintaining methadone treatment during short-term incarceration is more effective in reducing HIV risk behaviors (both injecting and sexual) than methadone detoxification upon community re-entry.
- To determine whether maintaining methadone treatment during short-term incarceration is more effective in reducing reincarceration than methadone detoxification.
- To determine the impact on cost of the first three specific aims.
Secondary aims will include determining the effect of methadone maintenance during short-term incarceration versus methadone detoxification on:
- retention in community based methadone treatment;
- the number of fatal and nonfatal overdoses; and
- criminal behavior
The targeted population will be 300 recently incarcerated inmates enrolled in community methadone treatment at the time of incarceration. Follow-up interviews will occur 1-month post release from incarceration and 6, and 12 months from baseline at an independent study site. Both groups will receive a risk behavior reduction counseling intervention and linkage to community methadone treatment upon release. If this project is able to demonstrate that maintaining inmates on methadone for short-term incarcerations is effective, then this can influence correctional policy to work more collaboratively with community substance use treatment providers and to minimize disruption of treatment.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||450 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||A Randomized Trail of Continues Methadone Maintenance Versus Detoxification in Jail|
|Study Start Date :||June 2010|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||June 2013|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||May 2014|
Experimental: Methadone Maintenance
Participants assigned to Arm 1 will be maintained on ther pre-incarceration methadone dosage during short term incarceration (6 months or less) and will be actively transferred back to their community methadone clinic upon release from incarceration. Additionally, the study will pay for the cost of methadone maintenance treatment for 10 weeks after re-enrollment post release.
Behavioral: Methadone Maintenance
Individuals who are enrolled in methadone maintenance treatment at the time of incarceration are maintained on pre-incarceration dosage levels of methadone during short-term (6 months or less)incarceration. They will be actively assisted to return to their home clinic upon release and receive 10 financial assistance with treatment payments.
Active Comparator: Methadone Detoxification
Individuals assigned to Arm 2 will undergo methadone detoxification as is standard procedure at the Rhode Island Department of Corrections. They will receive active assistance with returning to their home methadone clinic upon release from incarceration and 10 weeks financial assistance to pay for treatment.
Behavioral: Linkage to methadone maintenance
Individuals in the comparison arm will undergo methadone detoxification during short term incarceration, however, they will be actively assisted to return to their home clinic upon release and receive 10 financial assistance with treatment payments.
- Time to post release treatment engagement [ Time Frame: 30 days post release ]Do individuals maintained on MMT during short term incarceration return to their community methadone clinic more rapidly than those who undergo methadone detoxification during short term incarceration? Individuals must return within 30 days of post release to be or be counted as not returning.
- Reduction of HIV risk behaviors [ Time Frame: 12 months ]To determine whether individuals maintained on MMT during short term incarceration report fewer HIV risk behaviors (both drug use and sexual) as compared to standard of care arm.
- Time to relapse [ Time Frame: 30 days post release ]To determine whether individuals maintained on MMT during short term incarceration report longer to relapse (or no relapse) to opiate use as compared to standard of care arm.
- Cost effectiveness [ Time Frame: 12 months ]To determine the costs, cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit associated with continuing methadone maintenance versus detoxification for jailed individuals. Variables to be assessed are: reincarceration, health care utilization (i.e. emergency room use, medications), subsidized housing,
- Treatment retention [ Time Frame: 12 months ]length of time engaged in community methadone treatment
- Fatal and nonfatal overdose [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01874964
|United States, Rhode Island|
|Rhode Island Department of Corrections|
|Cranston, Rhode Island, United States, 02920|