Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the ETView Double-Lumen Tube
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01807676|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : March 8, 2013
Last Update Posted : April 28, 2014
No prospective randomized clinical trial assessed the performance of this new device in a clinical setting. Consequently the aim of this study is to determine clinical performance of this new device compared with conventional DLT.
- Trial with medical device
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Patients Undergoing Elective Thoracic Surgery Requiring Obligatory Single-lung Ventilation During Surgery||Device: ET View Double Lumen Tube Device: conventional Double Lumen Tube||Phase 4|
In several clinical situations and surgical procedures single-lung ventilation (SLV) is essential. Especially during thoracic surgery SLV and collapse of the operated lung, while ventilating the other side of the lung is the most frequented indication. In these cases the double lumen tube (DLT) is the most widely used device.
The DLT consists of a proximal tracheal and a distal bronchial end, reaching into the left or the right side of the lung- dependent of the model of the tube. Endotracheal intubation with DLT, which are much larger and stiffer than conventional single-lumen tubes, are much more difficult to place and are especially likely to provoke airway injuries. Furthermore, placement of a DLT requires obligatory fiberoptic bronchoscopy and a certain level of experience. Tube misplacement after patients removal from dorsal (intubation-) to lateral position as well as during surgical procedure is relatively frequent. Tube displacement from its proper position above the carina, respectively in the main bronchus, may result in life-threating complications and airway lacerations.
The anesthetist may detect tube misplacement from indirect clinical signs including increased airway pressure, oxygen desaturation, or difficulty performing SLV. In this clinical situations, verification of tube position using fibreoptic bronchoscopy is indicated. Fibreoptic bronchoscopy requires rigorous training and practice to maintain a high level of skill as well as expensive infrastructure.
The VivaSight-DL (ETView Ltd, M.P. Misgav 20174, Israel) is a new DLT promising to exceed clinical performance of the conventional DLT. The VivaSight-DL is basically a left-sided DLT with an embedded video imaging device and light source at its tip and integrated cable with connector. However, after correct tube placement, the video imaging device is focused on the main carina, indicating the correct position of the bronchial cuff in the left main bronchus.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||40 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the ETView Double-Lumen Tube|
|Study Start Date :||March 2013|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||February 2014|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||March 2014|
Active Comparator: ET View Double Lumen Tube
Patients assigned to the thisgroup will be intubated using the VivaSight-DL.
Device: ET View Double Lumen Tube
Other Name: VivaSight-DL (ETView Ltd, M.P. Misgav 20174, Israel)
Active Comparator: conventional Double Lumen Tube
Patients assigned to the first group will be intubated using conventional DLT (Bronchocath, left sided; Rüsch, Kernen, Germany).
Device: conventional Double Lumen Tube
Other Name: conventional DLT (Bronchocath, left sided; Rüsch, Kernen, Germany)
- time to intubation [ Time Frame: 300 seconds ]Time for intubation, defined as "time from insertion of the laryngoscope until statement of the intubating anesthesiologist, that DLT was correctly placed". Time for intubation will be measured by an independent researcher using a stop watch.
- Rate of misplacement [ Time Frame: 3 hours ]Rate of misplacement, occurring after patients removal from dorsal to lateral position
- Rate of misplacement [ Time Frame: 3 hours ]Rate of misplacement, occurring during surgery, potentially caused by vibrations and movements by surgeons
- Rate of blind insertion [ Time Frame: 300 seconds ]Rate of blind insertion, defined as successful placement of airway device in correct position in trachea/ main stream bronchus without help of fibreoptic bronchoscopy8
- rate of fibreoptic bronchoscopy [ Time Frame: 3 hours ]Necessity of tube re-placement by fibreoptic bronchoscopy
- Quality of lung collapse [ Time Frame: 3 hours ]
- Airway injuries [ Time Frame: 3 hours ]
- Postoperative coughing [ Time Frame: 24 hours ]
- Postoperative hoarseness [ Time Frame: 24 hours ]
- Postoperative sore throat [ Time Frame: 24 hours ]
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01807676
|University Hospital Zurich, Division of Anaesthesiology|
|Zurich, ZH, Switzerland, 8091|
|Principal Investigator:||Beatrice Beck Schimmer, Prof MD||University Hospital Zurich, Division of Anaesthesiology|