Working... Menu

Early Goal-Directed Sedation Compared With Standard Care in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients (SPICE III RCT)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. Identifier: NCT01728558
Recruitment Status : Active, not recruiting
First Posted : November 20, 2012
Last Update Posted : February 9, 2018
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre

Brief Summary:

The Use of sedative drugs in intensive care is widespread. A cohort study conducted in Australia and New Zealand in 2010 revealed a high prevalence of deep sedation within the first 48 hours of mechanical ventilation which was independently linked to prolonged ventilation, hospital and 180 days mortality. Clinical practice is moving towards the use of lighter levels of sedation. Recent RCTs in Europe (JAMA 2012) and previous RCTs (JAMA 2009) supports growing evidence that dexmedetomidine facilitates rousable sedation, shortens ventilation time and attenuates delirium when compared to midazolam and propofol.

The investigators confirmed in a pilot study the feasibility, efficacy and safety of a process of care known as Early Goal Directed Sedation (EGDS) that delivers:

  1. Early randomization after intubation or arrival in the ICU (intubated).
  2. Early Adequate analgesia after randomization.
  3. Goal directed sedation titrated to achieve light sedation.
  4. Dexmedetomidine based algorithm as the primary sedative agent with avoidance of benzodiazepines.

The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of Early Goal Directed Sedation when compared to standard care sedation in critically ill patients.

The study hypothesis is that Early Goal-Directed Sedation (EGDS), compared to standard care sedation, reduces 90-day all-cause mortality in critically ill patients who require mechanical ventilation.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Critical Illness and Mechanical Ventilation Other: Early goal Directed Sedation Other: Standard care sedation Phase 3

Detailed Description:

This is a large-scale study into the effectiveness of a novel approach for sedation in ventilated critically ill patients. The primary aim of this study is to determine whether Early Goal Directed Sedation therapy, compared to standard care sedation, reduces 90-day mortality in critically ill patients ventilated > 24 hrs.

The study will be a randomized, unblinded, controlled trial conducted in approximately 35-50 intensive care units (ICUs) and will recruit 4000 mechanically ventilated patients (life support) who are expected to remain on the ventilator > 24 hours AND require immediate ongoing sedative medication for comfort, safety, and to facilitate the delivery of life support measures, including mechanical ventilation.

Patients with primary brain injury or prolonged weakness are excluded. Participants will be randomized into one of 2 study groups. All patients will receive adequate analgesia at randomization at the discretion of treating clinician. All randomized patients will have Light sedation as the default target unless otherwise clinically indicated. The intervention group will receive EGDS with dexmedetomidine as the primary sedative agent to achieve light sedation, with the addition of propofol as required. The use of benzodiazepines in the intervention group is not allowed, with the exception of specific, defined circumstances.

The control group will have sedation according to usual practice as chosen by the treating clinician. The use of dexmedetomidine is not allowed, with the exception of specific, defined circumstances.

Deidentified data will be collected and will include; Baseline demographic information; Doses of all sedative, analgesic and other related medications; Pain, sedation and delirium scores and major treatments such as ventilation time, tracheostomy and dialysis. Patients surviving to hospital discharge will be contacted by phone to determine independent survival status at 90 days and again at 180 days plus Health Related Quality of Life and cognitive function assessment.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 4000 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Early Goal-Directed Sedation Compared With Standard Care in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: a Prospective Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial
Study Start Date : November 2013
Estimated Primary Completion Date : May 2018
Estimated Study Completion Date : August 2018

Arm Intervention/treatment
Early Goal Directed Sedation

Early Goal Directed Sedation process of care involves:

  1. Early delivery of proposed intervention, shortly after initiating mechanical ventilation;
  2. Effective analgesia provided simultaneously and early (analgesia first).
  3. Regular and frequent assessment of patient wakefulness/sedative state;
  4. Avoidance of benzodiazepines and minimisation of use of propofol;
  5. Reduced overall sedation depth with targeted light sedation; Patients randomised to the EGDS arm will receive a sedative infusion of Dexmedetomidine withor without minimal propofol in order to maintain a RASS of -2 to +1.

Dexmedetomidine infusion will be continued until sedation is no longer clinically indicated up to a maximum of 28 days after enrolment.

Other: Early goal Directed Sedation
Active Comparator: Standard care Sedation Arm
Patients randomised to the standard care sedation arm will receive process of care sedation directed by the treating clinician. Based on the information from our observational study and the EGDS Pilot trial, most patients in this group are likely to receive midazolam and /or propofol. These agents will be infused to achieve the default target of Light sedation (RASS -2 to +1) whenever clinically appropriate and as specified by the treating clinician. The use remifentanil or dexmedetomidine for initial and maintenance sedation will be precluded.
Other: Standard care sedation

Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Mortality [ Time Frame: Day 90 post randomisation ]

Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Ventilation free days [ Time Frame: at 28 days following randomisation ]
  2. Proportion of RASS measurements in target range [ Time Frame: up to day 28 ]
  3. Incidence and duration of delirium measured by delirium free days [ Time Frame: up to 28 days ]
  4. Length of ICU stay [ Time Frame: up to 180 days ]
  5. Proportion of patients who receive a tracheostomy Proportion of patients who require: re-intubation, physical restraints,or unplanned extubation, [ Time Frame: up to day 28 ]
  6. Cumulative dose of midazolam, propofol, dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, and morphine [ Time Frame: up to 28 days ]
  7. Duration of treatment with midazolam, propofol, dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, and morphine [ Time Frame: up to 28 days ]
  8. Mortality at hospital discharge [ Time Frame: at hospital discharge up to 180 days ]
  9. Length of hospital stay [ Time Frame: up to 180 days ]
  10. Readmission to ICU [ Time Frame: at 90 days ]
  11. EQ-5D questionnaire [ Time Frame: at 180 days ]
  12. Cognitive function [ Time Frame: at 180 days ]
  13. Mortality at ICU discharge [ Time Frame: up to 180 days ]
  14. Full time institutional dependency at 180 days [ Time Frame: up to 180 days ]
  15. Discharge destination [ Time Frame: up to 180 days ]

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.

Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has been intubated and is receiving mechanical ventilation
  • The treating clinician expects that the patient will remain intubated until the day after tomorrow (unlikely to be extubated the following day).
  • The patient requires immediate ongoing sedative medication for comfort, safety, and to facilitate the delivery of life support measures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age less than 18 years
  • Patient is pregnant and/or lactating
  • Has been intubated (excluding time spent intubated within an operating theatre or transport) for greater than 12 hours in an intensive care unit.
  • Proven or suspected acute primary brain lesion such as traumatic brain injury, intracranial haemorrhage, stroke, or hypoxic brain injury.
  • Proven or suspected spinal cord injury or other pathology that may result in permanent or prolonged weakness.
  • Admission as a consequence of a suspected or proven drug overdose or burns.
  • Administration of ongoing neuromuscular blockade.
  • A mean arterial blood (MAP) pressure that is less than 50 mmHg despite adequate resuscitation and vasopressor therapy at time of randomisation
  • Heart rate less than 55 beats per minute unless the patient is being treated with a beta-blocker or a high grade atrio-ventricular block in the absence of a functioning pacemaker.
  • Known sensitivity to any of the study medications or the constituents of propofol (egg, soya or peanut protein)
  • Acute fulminant hepatic failure
  • Patient has been receiving full time residential nursing care.
  • Death is deemed to be imminent or inevitable during this admission and either the attending physician, patient or substitute decision maker is not committed to active treatment.
  • Patient has an underlying disease that makes survival to 90 days unlikely
  • Patient has been previously enrolled in the SPICE study.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its identifier (NCT number): NCT01728558

Layout table for location information
Australia, New South Wales
Blacktown Hospital
Blacktown, New South Wales, Australia, 2148
St Vincent's Hospital Sydney
Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia, 2010
Gosford Hospital
Gosford, New South Wales, Australia, 2250
Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Hospital
Hornsby, New South Wales, Australia, 2077
Nepean Hospital
Penrith, New South Wales, Australia, 2750
Royal North Shore Hospital
St. Leonards, New South Wales, Australia, 2065
Prince of Wales Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2031
Westmead Hospital
Westmead, New South Wales, Australia, 2145
Australia, Northern Territory
Royal Darwin Hospital
Tiwi, Northern Territory, Australia, 0811
Australia, Queensland
Sunshine Coast Hospital (Nambour Hospital)
Buderim, Queensland, Australia, 4556
Royal Brisbane and Women's hospital
Herston, Queensland, Australia, 4029
Redcliffe Hospital
Redcliffe, Queensland, Australia, 4020
Gold Coast Hospital & Health Service
Southport, Queensland, Australia, 4215
Toowoomba Hospital
Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia, 4350
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia, 4102
Australia, South Australia
Lyell McEwan Hospital
Elizabeth Vale, South Australia, Australia, 5112
Australia, Tasmania
Royal Hobart Hospital
Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, 7000
Launceston General Hospital
Launceston, Tasmania, Australia, 7250
Australia, Victoria
Bendigo Hospital
Bendigo, Victoria, Australia, 3550
Dandenong Hospital
Dandenong, Victoria, Australia, 3175
Northern Hospital
Epping, Victoria, Australia, 3076
Geelong Hospital
Geelong, Victoria, Australia, 3220
Austin Hospital
Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia, 3084
Royal Melbourne Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3050
Monash Medical Centre
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3168
Central Gippsland Health Service
Sale, Victoria, Australia, 3850
Australia, Western Australia
St John Of God, Subiaco
Perth, Western Australia, Australia, 6008
New Zealand
Auckland City Hospital CVICU
Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand, 1023
Middlemore Hospital
Otahuhu, Auckland, New Zealand, 1640
Christchurch Hospital
Addington, Christchurch, New Zealand, 8011
North Shore Hospital
Takapuna, North Shore City, New Zealand, 0622
Wellington Hospital
Newtown, Wellington, New Zealand, 6021
Auckland City hospital
Auckland, New Zealand, 1023
Rotorua Hospital
Rotorua, New Zealand, 3010
Sponsors and Collaborators
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia
Layout table for investigator information
Study Chair: Yahya Shehabi, MD, FCICM, FANZCA, EMBA University New South Wales, Prince of Wales Hospital, ANZIC-RC
Principal Investigator: Rinaldo Bellomo ANZIC-RC & Austin Hospital
Principal Investigator: Steve A. R Webb ANZIC-RC & Royal Perth Hospital
Principal Investigator: Michael C Reade ANZIC-RC, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Department of Military Medicine and Surgery,
Principal Investigator: Belinda D Howe ANZIC-RC
Principal Investigator: Ian M Seppelt ANZIC-RC, Nepean Hospital
Principal Investigator: Colin McArthur ANZIC-RC, Auckland Hospital
Principal Investigator: Simon Erikson ANZIC-RC,
Principal Investigator: Lynne Murray ANZIC-RC
Principal Investigator: Suhaini Kadiman Institut Jantung Negara, Malaysia
Principal Investigator: Jukka Takala Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
Principal Investigator: Yaseen Arabi King Abdulaziz Medical Centre, KSA
Principal Investigator: Matthew P Wise University Hospital of Wales, UK

Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre Identifier: NCT01728558     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: ANZIC-RC/YS003
First Posted: November 20, 2012    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: February 9, 2018
Last Verified: February 2018

Keywords provided by Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre:
Goal Directed
Mechanical ventilation
Intensive care
Critically Ill

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Critical Illness
Disease Attributes
Pathologic Processes
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Central Nervous System Depressants
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
Sensory System Agents
Peripheral Nervous System Agents
Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists
Adrenergic alpha-Agonists
Adrenergic Agonists
Adrenergic Agents
Neurotransmitter Agents
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action