Prolift Versus IVS for Pelvic Floor Prolapse
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01383291|
Recruitment Status : Withdrawn
First Posted : June 28, 2011
Last Update Posted : June 20, 2014
- Women who underwent mesh or sling procedures to correct pelvic organ prolapse will be enrolled.
- Their data will be collected from the files.
- Comparison between two groups will be carried our: Those who underwent a posterior IVS and those who underwent posterior prolift procedure.
- The data will be obtained by questionaires by a telephone interview by a physician who did not participate in the surgery.
- Follow-up physical examination data will also be obtained.
|Condition or disease|
|Pelvic Floor Prolapse|
|Study Type :||Observational|
|Actual Enrollment :||0 participants|
|Observational Model:||Case Control|
|Official Title:||Postoperative Comparison Between Posterior Prolift Mesh Placement and Posterior IVS Sling Placement|
|Study Start Date :||February 2009|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||January 2013|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||June 2013|
Pelvic floor prolapse
Those who underwent prolift and those who underwent IVS
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01383291
|Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Western Galilee Hospital|
|Clinics of Dr Neuman|
|Rishon Lezion, Israel|