A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Haemostatic Agent in Primary Unilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty
|Study Design:||Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor
Primary Purpose: Treatment
|Official Title:||A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Haemostatic Agent in Primary Unilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty|
- Transfusion Requirement [ Time Frame: intraoperative - 1 week postoperative ]Measure Title: Units of transfusion required
- Total Hemoglobin Level Change [ Time Frame: day of surgery - 1 week postoperative ]Total hemoglobin level change from preop to postoperative discharge.
|Study Start Date:||December 2010|
|Study Completion Date:||December 2014|
|Primary Completion Date:||October 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
No Intervention: Control
No Vitagel used during total hip arthroplasty
Vitagel applied just prior to closure during total hip arthroplasty
Two 4.5mL Vitagel Surgical Hemostat Kits, used just prior to closing the capsule.
Vitagel Surgical Hemostat is composed of microfibrillar collagen and thrombin in combination with autologous plasma. It is applied to the surgical site as a sprayable liquid which then forms a collagen/fibrin gel matrix (containing the patients activated platelets) which adheres to the bleeding site. This matrix provides hemostasis and facilitates healing. Vitagel is resorbed in approximately 30 days. It is easily prepared by the OR staff in minutes and only requires ~10mL's of the patient's blood per Vitagel 4.5ml kit. Compared to other hemostatic agents on the market today, Vitagel has the advantages of not containing pooled human donor blood proteins, aprotinin, or tranexamic acid.
Vitagel has been studied in multiple surgical specialties to demonstrate safety and efficacy. Vitagel was studied in orthopedic procedures, both on iliac crest donor sites and sternal edges, during its IDE studies for FDA approval. Vitagel was granted broad indications for use by the FDA in 2000 as an adjunct to hemostasis. It was formerly marketed under the name CoStasis® Surgical Hemostat, by Cohesion Technologies, Palo Alto, CA.
The use of a surgical hemostat in joint arthroplasty may substantially decrease post-operative blood loss, which may reduce patient morbidity, length of hospital stay, and costs by potentially eliminating the need for transfusions and drains.
Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is associated with post-operative blood loss and frequently requires the transfusion of blood products. Increased concern over the risks of blood transfusion, which include transmission of viral diseases, such as HIV, Hepatitis, and CMV as well as transfusion reactions, has perpetuated the search for new methods of blood conservation in orthopedic surgery. There exists considerable variation in the protocols that are used to optimize hemostasis and minimize post-operative blood loss in patients undergoing THA. Some methods used include pre-operative hemodilution and hypotensive anesthesia; however, these methods have associated risks, require careful monitoring, and can prolong the operative time. Another method used is intra-operative and post-operative salvage of blood with re-infusion which requires continuous monitoring and is limited to patients who bled heavily during the initial period following surgery, because the blood should be collected over a period of not more than six hours. The transfusion of autologous pre-donated blood is also commonly used in THA surgery. While autologous pre-donated blood is not associated with the risk of viral disease transmission, the rates of administrative error and bacterial overgrowth (the factors most frequently associated with immediate post-transfusion deaths) are comparable with those associated with the use of homologous blood. The collection of pre-donated blood requires special programs and scheduling. Studies have indicated that the use of autologous blood transfusions may have little health benefit at considerable costs.
During surgery, meticulous electrocautery, helps minimize both acute blood loss and post-operative drainage. No uniform guidelines exist regarding the use of post-operative drains in THA. Some surgeons use drain systems that allow re-infusion of the erythrocytes, others prefer simple vacuum drains. Still others do not use drains at all. There are conflicting data regarding the efficacy of closed suction drains. Some studies have shown that bleeding may be potentiated by suction drainage. Other studies have shown that drains can lead to complications such as infection, increased blood loss, need for blood transfusions, breakage in the drain tube, and pain during drain tube removal. Thus, the need for adequate hemostasis in THA remains apparent.
To date there have been limited published studies on the use of hemostatic agents during THA procedures. However, even in a relatively low number of patients these studies have shown that the use of hemostatic agents is a safe and effective means to reduce blood loss and the need for and rate of blood transfusions.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01285024
|United States, Ohio|
|Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195|
|Principal Investigator:||Wael K Barsoum, MD||The Cleveland Clinic|