PALACE 2: Efficacy and Safety Study of Apremilast to Treat Active Psoriatic Arthritis (PALACE2)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to determine whether apremilast is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis.
Apremilast is proposed to improve signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis (tender and swollen joints, pain, physical function) in treated patients.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Psoriatic Arthritis | Drug: Apremilast 20mg Drug: Apremilast 30mg Drug: Placebo + 20 mg Apremilast Drug: Placebo + 30 mg Apremilast | Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Efficacy and Safety Study of Two Doses of Apremilast (CC-10004) in Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis |
- Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ]
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:
- ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count;
- ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and
-
≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI));
- C-Reactive Protein.
- Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ]The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability.
- Percentage of Participants With an ACR 20 Response at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ]
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:
- ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count;
- ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and
-
≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI));
- C-Reactive Protein.
- Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ]The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability.
- Change From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Domain at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ]The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). Norm-based scores were used in analyses, calibrated so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. The physical functioning domain assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
- Percentage of Participants With a Modified Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ]
Modified PsARC response is defined as improvement in at least 2 of the 4 measures, at least one of which must be tender joint count or swollen joint count, and no worsening in any of the 4 measures:
- 78 tender joint count,
- 76 swollen joint count,
- Patient global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm visual Analog scale (VAS), where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest;
- Physician global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest.
Improvement or worsening in joint counts is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 30%, and improvement or worsening in global assessments is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 20 mm VAS.
- Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ]The participant was asked to place a vertical line on a 100-mm visual analog scale on which the left-hand boundary (score = 0 mm) represents "no pain," and the right-hand boundary (score = 100 mm) represents "pain as severe as can be imagined." The distance from the mark to the left-hand boundary was recorded in millimeters.
- Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES) at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ]
The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone):
1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right.
The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
- Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ]Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet will be rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
- Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ]
The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of the:
- 28 tender joint count (TJC),
- 28 swollen joint count (SJC),
- Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest;
- Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity -measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest.
The CDAI score ranges from 0-76 where lower scores indicate less disease activity.
The following thresholds of disease activity have been defined for the CDAI:
Remission: ≤ 2.8 Low Disease Activity: > 2.8 and ≤ 10 Moderate Disease Activity: > 10 and ≤ 22 High Disease Activity: > 22.
- Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ]
The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables:
- 28 tender joint count
- 28 swollen joint count, which do not include the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee;
- C-reactive protein (CRP)
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity.
DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible level of CRP. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.
- Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ]
The FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means "not at all," and 4 means "very much." The FACIT-Fatigue scale score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores denoting lower levels of fatigue.
A positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.
- Change From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Domain at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ]The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). Norm-based scores were used in analyses, calibrated so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. The physical functioning domain assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
- Percentage of Participants With a Modified Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ]
Modified PsARC response is defined as improvement in at least 2 of the 4 measures, at least one of which must be tender joint count or swollen joint count, and no worsening in any of the 4 measures:
- 78 tender joint count,
- 76 swollen joint count,
- Patient global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm visual Analog scale (VAS), where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest;
- Physician global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest.
Improvement or worsening in joint counts is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 30%, and improvement or worsening in global assessments is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 20 mm VAS.
- Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ]The participant was asked to place a vertical line on a 100-mm visual analog scale on which the left-hand boundary (score = 0 mm) represents "no pain," and the right-hand boundary (score = 100 mm) represents "pain as severe as can be imagined." The distance from the mark to the left-hand boundary was recorded in millimeters.
- Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES) at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ]
The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone):
1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right.
The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
- Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ]Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet will be rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
- Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ]
The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of the:
- 28 tender joint count (TJC),
- 28 swollen joint count (SJC),
- Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest;
- Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity -measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest.
The CDAI score ranges from 0-76 where lower scores indicate less disease activity.
The following thresholds of disease activity have been defined for the CDAI:
Remission: ≤ 2.8; Low Disease Activity: > 2.8 and ≤ 10; Moderate Disease Activity: > 10 and ≤ 22; High Disease Activity: > 22.
- Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ]
The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables:
- 28 tender joint count
- 28 swollen joint count, which do not include the DIP joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee;
- C-reactive protein (CRP)
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity.
DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible level of CRP. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.
- Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ]The FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means "not at all," and 4 means "very much." The FACIT-Fatigue scale score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores denoting lower levels of fatigue. A positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.
- Percentage of Participants With MASES Improvement ≥ 20% at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ]
Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improved by ≥ 20% from Baseline after 16 weeks of treatment. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone):
1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right.
The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
- Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis Improvement ≥ 1 Point at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ]
Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improved by ≥ 1 after 16 weeks of treatment.
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
- Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ]
A EULAR response reflects an improvement in disease activity and an attainment of a lower degree of disease activity based on the DAS-28 score.
A Good Response is defined as an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 compared with Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2.
A Moderate Response is defined as either:
- an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of greater than 0.6 and less than or equal to 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of less than or equal to 5.1 or,
- an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of greater than 3.2.
- Percentage of Participants With MASES Improvement ≥ 20% at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ]
Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improved by ≥ 20% from Baseline after 24 weeks of treatment. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone):
1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right.
The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
- Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis Improvement ≥ 1 Point at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ]
Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improved by ≥ 1 after 24 weeks of treatment.
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
- Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate EULAR Response at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ]
EULAR response reflects an improvement in disease activity and an attainment of a lower degree of disease activity based on the DAS-28 score.
A Good Response is defined as an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 compared with Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2.
A Moderate Response is defined as either:
- an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of greater than 0.6 and less than or equal to 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of less than or equal to 5.1 or,
- an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of greater than 3.2.
- Percentage of Participants With a ACR 50 Response at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ]
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:
- ≥ 50% improvement in 78 tender joint count;
- ≥ 50% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and
-
≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI));
- C-Reactive Protein.
- Percentage of Participants With an ACR 70 Response at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ]
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:
- ≥ 70% improvement in 78 tender joint count;
- ≥ 70% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and
-
≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI));
- C-Reactive Protein.
- Percentage of Participants With an ACR 50 Response at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ]
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:
- ≥ 50% improvement in 78 tender joint count;
- ≥ 50% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and
-
≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI));
- C-Reactive Protein.
- Percentage of Participants With a ACR 70 Response at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ]
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:
- ≥ 70% improvement in 78 tender joint count;
- ≥ 70% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and
-
≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI));
- C-Reactive Protein.
- Percentage of Participants Achieving a MASES Score of Zero at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Week 16 ]
Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improves to 0 after 16 weeks of treatment. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone):
1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right.
The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
- Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dactylitis Score of Zero at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Week 16 ]
Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improves to zero after 16 weeks of treatment.
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
- Percentage of Participants Achieving a MASES Score of Zero at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Week 24 ]
Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improves to 0 after 24 weeks of treatment. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone):
1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right.
The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
- Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dactylitis Score of Zero at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Week 24 ]
Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improves to zero after 24 weeks of treatment.
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
- Percentage of Participants With a ACR 20 Response at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52 ]
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:
- ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count;
- ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and
-
≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI));
- C-Reactive Protein.
Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
- Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52 ]The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability.
- Change From Baseline in the SF-36 Physical Functioning Scale Score at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52 ]The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). Norm-based scores were used in analyses, calibrated so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. The physical functioning domain assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
- Percentage of Participants With a Modified PsARC Response at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52 ]
Modified PsARC response is defined as improvement in at least 2 of the 4 measures, at least one of which must be tender joint count or swollen joint count, and no worsening in any of the 4 measures:
- 78 tender joint count,
- 76 swollen joint count,
- Patient global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm visual Analog scale (VAS), where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest;
- Physician global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest.
Improvement or worsening in joint counts is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 30%, and improvement or worsening in global assessments is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 20 mm VAS.
Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
- Change From Baseline in the Patient Assessment of Pain at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52 ]The participant was asked to place a vertical line on a 100-mm visual analog scale on which the left-hand boundary (score = 0 mm) represents "no pain," and the right-hand boundary (score = 100 mm) represents "pain as severe as can be imagined." The distance from the mark to the left-hand boundary was recorded in millimeters.
- Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES) at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52 ]
The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone):
1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right.
The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
- Change From Baseline in the Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52 ]Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet will be rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
- Change From Baseline in the CDAI Score at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52 ]
The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of the:
- 28 tender joint count (TJC),
- 28 swollen joint count (SJC),
- Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest;
- Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity -measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest.
The CDAI score ranges from 0-76 where lower scores indicate less disease activity.
The following thresholds of disease activity have been defined for the CDAI:
Remission: ≤ 2.8 Low Disease Activity: > 2.8 and ≤ 10 Moderate Disease Activity: > 10 and ≤ 22 High Disease Activity: > 22.
- Change From Baseline in the DAS28 at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52 ]
The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables:
- 28 tender joint count
- 28 swollen joint count, which do not include the DIP joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee;
- C-reactive protein (CRP)
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity.
DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible level of CRP. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.
- Change From Baseline in the FACIT-Fatigue Scale Score at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52 ]The FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means "not at all," and 4 means "very much." The FACIT-Fatigue scale score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores denoting lower levels of fatigue. A positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.
- Percentage of Participants With MASES Improvement ≥ 20% at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52 ]
Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improved by ≥ 20% from Baseline after 52 weeks. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone):
1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right.
The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
- Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis Improvement ≥ 1 Point at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52 ]
Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improved by ≥ 1 after 52 weeks.
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
- Percentage of Participants Achieving Good or Moderate EULAR Response at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52 ]
A EULAR response reflects an improvement in disease activity and an attainment of a lower degree of disease activity based on the DAS-28 score.
A Good Response is defined as an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 compared with Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2.
A Moderate Response is defined as either:
- an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of greater than 0.6 and less than or equal to 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of less than or equal to 5.1 or,
- an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of greater than 3.2.
- Percentage of Participants With an ACR 50 Response at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52 ]
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:
- ≥ 50% improvement in 78 tender joint count;
- ≥ 50% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and
-
≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI));
- C-Reactive Protein.
Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
- Percentage of Participants With an ACR 70 Response at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52 ]
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:
- ≥ 70% improvement in 78 tender joint count;
- ≥ 70% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and
-
≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
- Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI));
- C-Reactive Protein.
Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
- Percentage of Participants Achieving a MASES Score of Zero at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Week 52 ]
Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improves to 0 after 24 weeks. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone):
1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right.
The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
- Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dactylitis Score of Zero at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Week 52 ]
Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improves to zero after 52 weeks.
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
- Number of Participants With Adverse Events [ Time Frame: Up to 5 years ]
| Enrollment: | 488 |
| Actual Study Start Date: | September 27, 2010 |
| Study Completion Date: | January 25, 2017 |
| Primary Completion Date: | July 26, 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Apremilast 20mg
20 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice daily for 24 weeks during the placebo-controlled phase followed by 20 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice daily for up to 4.5 years in the active treatment / long-term safety phase
|
Drug: Apremilast 20mg
Apremilast 20 mg twice daily, orally
Other Name: CC-10004
|
|
Experimental: Apremilast 30mg
30 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice a day for 24 weeks during the placebo-controlled phase followed by 30 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice a day for up to 4.5 years in the active treatment / long-term safety phase orally twice daily
|
Drug: Apremilast 30mg
Apremilast 30 mg twice daily, orally
Other Name: CC-10004
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo + 20 mg Apremilast
Placebo + 20 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice daily for 24 weeks during the placebo-controlled phase followed by 20 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice daily for up to 4.5 years in the active treatment / long-term safety phase. Subjects who do not have at least 20% improvement in their swollen and tender joint counts at Week 16 will escape to 20 mg Apremilast twice daily at Week 16
|
Drug: Placebo + 20 mg Apremilast
Placebo + 20 mg Apremilast
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo + 30 mg Apremilast
Placebo + 30 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice daily for 24 weeks during the placebo-controlled phase followed by 30 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice daily for up to 4.5 years in the active treatment / long-term safety phase. Subjects who do not have at least 20% improvement in their swollen and tender joint counts at Week 16 will escape to 30 mg Apremilast twice daily at Week 16.
|
Drug: Placebo + 30 mg Apremilast
Placebo + 30 mg Apremilast
Other Names:
|
Detailed Description:
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Senior) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Males or females, aged ≥ 18 years at time of consent.
- Have a diagnosis of Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA, by any criteria) of ≥ 6 months duration.
- Meet the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) PsA at time of screening.
- Must have been inadequately treated by disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs)
- May not have axial involvement alone
- Concurrent Treatment allowed with methotrexate, leflunomide, or sulfasalazine
- Have ≥ 3 swollen AND ≥ 3 tender joints.
- Males & Females must use contraception
- Stable dose of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), narcotics and low dose oral corticosteroids allowed.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant or breast feeding.
- History of allergy to any component of the investigational product.
- Hepatitis B surface antigen and/or Hepatitis C antibody positive at screening.
- Therapeutic failure on > 3 agents for PsA or > 1 biologic tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker
Contacts and LocationsPlease refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01212757
Show 99 Study Locations
| Study Director: | Douglas Hough, M.D. | Celgene |
More Information
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Celgene |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01212757 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
CC-10004-PSA-003 2010-018386-32 ( EudraCT Number ) |
| Study First Received: | September 29, 2010 |
| Results First Received: | April 21, 2014 |
| Last Updated: | May 18, 2017 |
Keywords provided by Celgene:
|
Psoriasis Arthritis Psoriatic Arthritis inflammation skin condition |
inflammatory cells apremilast CC-10004 phosphodiesterase type 4 |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Arthritis Arthritis, Psoriatic Joint Diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases Spondylarthropathies Spondylarthritis Spondylitis Spinal Diseases Bone Diseases Psoriasis Skin Diseases, Papulosquamous Skin Diseases Apremilast Thalidomide Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal |
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic Analgesics Sensory System Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Anti-Inflammatory Agents Antirheumatic Agents Immunosuppressive Agents Immunologic Factors Leprostatic Agents Anti-Bacterial Agents Anti-Infective Agents Angiogenesis Inhibitors Angiogenesis Modulating Agents Growth Substances |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on July 14, 2017


IMPORTANT: Listing of a study on this site does not reflect endorsement by the National Institutes of Health. Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. 
