Incidence of Simultaneous Epidural and Intravascular Injection

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. Identifier: NCT01020929
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : November 26, 2009
Last Update Posted : June 6, 2012
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Stanford University

Brief Summary:

The investigator hopes to learn the incidence of needle placement in both the epidural and intravascular space, and learn mixed epidural-intravascular pattern related to needle type, gauge, and level of injection. We also hope to evaluate the length of fluoroscopy time when using real time fluoroscopy during contrast dye injection, evaluate the radiation exposure to the hands of the physician during this protocol, and confirm the incidence fo intravascular injection and sensitivity of needle flash of blood, In the lumbar spine, vascular contrast patterns are more than twice as likely to appear simultaneous to the anticipated epidural pattern, than they are to occur alone. This is important since practitioners are more likely to miss a vascular pattern that occurs simultaneous to epidural spread, than they are to occur alone. The incidence of intravascular penetration in cervical transforaminal epidural injections is known to exceed that of lumbar injections, however no study has determined the incidence of simultaneous epidural and vascular injection in the cervical spine. This study may prove that real time fluoroscopy during contrast injection is warranted to prevent intravascular injection and resultant side effects to support this as standard of care.

Intermittent fluoroscopy can yield false-negative results for intravascular injection when simultaneous epidural and intravascular injection occurs. This could lead to an increased risk of complication from intravascular injection of medications and reduce overall efficacy. No studies to date have quantified the incidence of needle placement located in both the intravascular space and epidural space simultaneously.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment
Spinal Diseases Device: Blunt Coude Device: Quincke Device: Trucath

Detailed Description:

Any patient undergoing a lumbar or cervical transforaminal epidural, as ordered by their treating physician will provide written informed consent before the procedure is conducted. The contents of the consent forms will be used to explain the study to patients. There are no drug treatments associated with the study other than those which are part of the existing treatment plan. There is no subject randomization. Subjects will be recruited consecutively.

Patients with pregnancy, coagulopathy, systemic infection, allergy to contrast dye, mentally disabled or those whom are unable to give informed consent will be excluded from the study.

  1. One experienced physician (>5 years experience) will use intermittent fluoroscopy to place needle for transforaminal epidural position using standard techniques. The physician will then use real time fluoroscopy when injecting the contrast solution to determine pattern of contrast flow (his standard of care).
  2. For each individual epidural site (each level and side per patient per setting counted as separate injections) the following will be identified:

    1. Patients age
    2. Diagnosis (reason for epidural) i.e. spinal stenosis, HNP, DDD
    3. Procedure level
    4. Gauge of needle
    5. Type of needle tip
    6. Aspiration of blood in needle hub pre-injection
    7. Contrast pattern using real time fluoroscopy
    8. Number of attempts of needle positioning
    9. Total fluoro time per case
  3. The physician will routinely wear a ring radiation badge to determine average radiation exposure to his hand.
  4. Analyze results
  5. Confirm incidence of intravascular pattern per level and determine incidence of mixed intravascular-epidural pattern per level.
  6. Quantify average fluoro exposure time and compare to average flouro time of identical procedures using intermittent fluoroscopy.

All of the procedures for this protocol are standard of care.

All data is collected during the procedure. There will be no follow-ups after the procedure.

We will be asking participants if they are willing to be contacted regarding future research studies that may be of interest to them.

Study Type : Observational
Actual Enrollment : 200 participants
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Prospective
Official Title: Incidence of Simultaneous Epidural and Intravascular Injection During Cervical and Lumbosacral Transforaminal Epidural Injections
Study Start Date : July 2009
Actual Primary Completion Date : August 2011
Actual Study Completion Date : September 2011

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

U.S. FDA Resources

Intervention Details:
    Device: Blunt Coude
    Type of needle tip
    Device: Quincke
    Type of needle tip
    Device: Trucath
    Type of needle tip

Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Presence or Absence of Vascular Patterns [ Time Frame: At the time of injection ]

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Sampling Method:   Probability Sample
Study Population
We plan to enroll a total of 500 subjects ( 250 subjects undergoing cervical and 250 subjects undergoing lumbosacral transforaminal epidural injection ) ;(iii) patients will have radiculopathies, herniated discs, and spinal stenosis coming to Stanford for an epidural steroid injection


  1. Any patient undergoing a lumbar or cervical transforaminal epidural, as ordered by their treating physician.
  2. Ability to give informed consent.


  1. Pregnancy
  2. Coagulopathy
  3. Systemic infection
  4. Allergy to contrast dye
  5. Mentally disabled or those whom are unable to give informed consent

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its identifier (NCT number): NCT01020929

United States, California
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California, United States, 94305
Sponsors and Collaborators
Stanford University
Principal Investigator: Matthew W Smuck Stanford University

Responsible Party: Stanford University Identifier: NCT01020929     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: SU-09222009-3980
16750 ( Other Identifier: Stanford University )
First Posted: November 26, 2009    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: June 6, 2012
Last Verified: June 2012

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Spinal Diseases
Bone Diseases
Musculoskeletal Diseases