Pilot Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Lidoderm Patch in the Treatment of Low Back Pain
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00904475 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : May 19, 2009
Last Update Posted : February 15, 2010
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Chronic Low Back Pain | Drug: Lidoderm® | Phase 4 |
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 102 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | Double (Participant, Investigator) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | A Prospective, Prospective, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Pilot Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Lidoderm Patch in the Treatment of Low Back Pain |
Study Start Date : | April 2003 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | April 2003 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: 1- Lidoderm®
Lidoderm (lidocaine patch 5%), up to three patches applied topically once daily (q24h) to the area of maximal peripheral pain
|
Drug: Lidoderm®
Eligible patients were randomized equally to one of two groups: lidocaine patch 5% or matching placebo patch. During the 6-week treatment period, patients used up to three patches daily applied q24h.
Other Name: Lidocaine patch 5% |
Placebo Comparator: 2-Placebo
Matching placebo, up to three patches applied topically once daily (q24h) to the area of maximal peripheral pain
|
Drug: Lidoderm®
Eligible patients were randomized equally to one of two groups: lidocaine patch 5% or matching placebo patch. During the 6-week treatment period, patients used up to three patches daily applied q24h.
Other Name: Lidocaine patch 5% |
- Mean change in average daily pain intensity (BPI Question 5) from baseline week to the final week of treatment (primary endpoint) [ Time Frame: Visit - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4 (Day 14), V5 (Day 28), V6/EOS (Day 42) ]
- Mean change from baseline to Week 2 and Week6/EOS in average daily pain intensity (BPI Question 5)
- Pain relief (BPI Question 8)
- Mean change from baseline to Week 2 and Week 6 in Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS)
- Patient and Investigator Global Impression of Pain Relief at Week 6
- QoL: Change from baseline to Week 6 in pain interference with QoL (BPI Question 9) and Profile of Mood States (POMS)
- Safety assessments included AEs, discontinuations as a result of AEs, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, physical examination, plasma lidocaine levels, dermal assessments and sking sensory testing

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Were currently experiencing moderate/severe pain despite current analgesic treatment
- Had daily moderate-to-severe LBP for at least 3 months duration
- Had a mean daily pain intensity score of >6 on a 0 to 10 scale, with 0 being no pain and 10 being pain as bad as the patients have ever imagined (Question 5 of BPI) during the baseline week; patients had to complete daily diary assessments at least 5 of 7 days during the baseline week
Exclusion Criteria:
- Had a history of greater than one back surgery, or one back surgery within 3 months of study entry
- Had severe spinal stenosis
- Had chronic back pain of >12 months duration with an undefined spinal diagnosis
- Had radicular symptoms with radiation into the thigh or below (i.e., knee, calf, foot, etc.)
- Had received an epidural steroid/local anesthetic injection within 2 weeks prior to study entry
- Had received trigger point injections within 2 weeks prior to study entry
- Had received Botulinum Toxin Injections for LBP within 3 months prior to study entry
- Were taking a lidocaine-containing product that could not be discontinued while receiving study medication
- Were taking class 1 anti-arrhythmic drugs (e.g., mexiletine, tocainide)
- Had received Lidoderm for LBP in the past

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00904475
United States, Alabama | |
Birmingham, Alabama, United States | |
Hueytown, Alabama, United States | |
United States, Arizona | |
Phoenix, Arizona, United States | |
United States, California | |
Mill Valley, California, United States | |
United States, Pennsylvania | |
Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States | |
United States, Utah | |
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States |
Study Director: | Sr. Director | Endo Pharmaceuticals |
Responsible Party: | Sr. Director, Clinical R&D, Endo Pharmaceuticals |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00904475 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
EN3220-011 |
First Posted: | May 19, 2009 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | February 15, 2010 |
Last Verified: | February 2010 |
Back Pain Low Back Pain Pain Neurologic Manifestations Lidocaine Anesthetics, Local Anesthetics Central Nervous System Depressants |
Physiological Effects of Drugs Sensory System Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Anti-Arrhythmia Agents Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers Sodium Channel Blockers Membrane Transport Modulators Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action |