Evaluation Research of a National Accreditation and Improvement Programme for General Practice
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00791362 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : November 14, 2008
Last Update Posted : July 9, 2013
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Objective: This study aims to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of a national accreditation and improvement programme for general practice, focusing on patients with established cardiovascular diseases.
Design: Cluster randomised trial with a block design. All practices start with the accreditation procedure.Intervention group practices are requested to focus their improvement plans in the first year on cardiovascular disease. Control group practices are requested to focus their improvement plans in the first year on other domains. Measurements at baseline are based on the standard audit in the accreditation procedure. Follow-up measurements are done 12 months after approval of improvement plans.
Participants: Primary care physicians in The Netherlands.
Interventions to be implemented: improvement plans concerning cardiovascular risk management, as described by recently updated national multidisciplinary evidence-based NHG / CBO guidelines, considering patients with established cardiovascular diseases.
Implementation strategy: The national programme for accreditation and improvement of general practice. This procedure consists of a package of activities, including audit, feedback, improvement plans, and follow-up.
Outcome measures: Primary outcomes are percentages of patients with CVD who have acceptable systolic blood pressure and cholesterol levels (quantified according to the indicators in the accreditation)and who use aspirin or alternatives. Secondary measures include clinical and organisational indicators of quality of cardiovascular care, such as percentages of patients with cardiovascular disease whose risk factors were assessed and who received specific medication.
Economic evaluation: Incremental cost effectiveness ratio's are determined of the implementation strategy compared to no implementation. The analysis will take a societal perspective and a time horizon of the observed period as well as a hypothetical 10 years period (using modelling). Uncertainty related to the estimations is examined with sensitivity analyses and bootstrapping. The long term economic evaluation is based on Markov modelling.
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Cardiovascular Disease | Other: National programme for accreditation and improvement of GP | Not Applicable |
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 1685 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | None (Open Label) |
Primary Purpose: | Health Services Research |
Official Title: | Effects and Costs of a National Continuous Improvement Programme on Cardiovascular Diseases in Primary Care |
Study Start Date : | December 2008 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | September 2012 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | December 2012 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
improvement programme CVD |
Other: National programme for accreditation and improvement of GP
The national programme for accreditation and improvement of general practice. This procedure consists of a package of activities, including audit, feedback, improvement plans, and follow-up. It is partly based on new theories on quality improvement, including the use of market forces and pressure for accountability. For the purpose of the study, the intervention group will be requested to focus their improvement plans in the first year on cardiovascular diseases. The control group is requested to focus their improvement plans in the first year on other domains and to provide cardiovascular care as usual. |
improvement programme other conditions |
Other: National programme for accreditation and improvement of GP
The national programme for accreditation and improvement of general practice. This procedure consists of a package of activities, including audit, feedback, improvement plans, and follow-up. It is partly based on new theories on quality improvement, including the use of market forces and pressure for accountability. For the purpose of the study, the intervention group will be requested to focus their improvement plans in the first year on cardiovascular diseases. The control group is requested to focus their improvement plans in the first year on other domains and to provide cardiovascular care as usual. |
- Percentages of patients with CVD who have acceptable systolic blood pressure and cholesterol levels (quantified according to the indicators in the accreditation)and who use aspirin or alternatives. [ Time Frame: dec 2008-feb 2011 ]
- Clinical and organisational indicators of quality of cardiovascular care, such as percentages of patients with cardiovascular disease whose riskfactors were assessed and who received specific medication. [ Time Frame: dec 2008-feb 2011 ]

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | Child, Adult, Older Adult |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with established cardiovascular diseases (myocard infarct, angina pectoris, cerebrovascular accident, Transient Ischaemic Attack, peripheral vascular disease, aneurysma aortae)
Exclusion Criteria:
-

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00791362
Netherlands | |
23 Locations | |
Nijmegen, Netherlands |
Principal Investigator: | Michel Wensing, Dr | IQ Scientific Institute for Quality of HealthCare - UMC St Radboud |
Responsible Party: | Radboud University |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00791362 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
PAHVZ 170883001 |
First Posted: | November 14, 2008 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | July 9, 2013 |
Last Verified: | May 2012 |
accreditation cardiovascular disease primary care |
Cardiovascular Diseases |