Working…
COVID-19 is an emerging, rapidly evolving situation.
Get the latest public health information from CDC: https://www.coronavirus.gov.

Get the latest research information from NIH: https://www.nih.gov/coronavirus.
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Dose-finding Study Comparing Efficacy and Safety of a PARP Inhibitor Against Doxil in BRCA+ve Advanced Ovarian Cancer (ICEBERG 3)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00628251
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : March 5, 2008
Results First Posted : June 3, 2016
Last Update Posted : December 5, 2019
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
AstraZeneca

Study Description
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information
Brief Summary:
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of drug AZD2281 against liposomal doxorubicin to see which is effective and well tolerated in treating patients with measurable BRCA1- or BRCA2-positive advanced ovarian cancer and who have failed previous platinum therapy.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Ovarian Neoplasms Drug: AZD2281 Drug: Liposomal Doxorubicin Phase 2

Expanded Access : An investigational treatment associated with this study has been approved for sale to the public.   More info ...

Study Design
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 97 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Phase II, Open-Label, Randomised, Comparative, International Multicentre Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Different Doses of AZD2281 Given Orally Twice Daily Versus Intravenous Liposomal Doxorubicin Given Monthly in Patients With Advanced BRCA1- or BRCA2-Associated Ovarian Cancer Who Have Failed Previous Platinum-based Chemotherapy
Actual Study Start Date : July 30, 2008
Actual Primary Completion Date : September 15, 2009
Actual Study Completion Date : September 19, 2018

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Ovarian Cancer

Arms and Interventions
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: 1
AZD2281 Oral 200 mg BID
 Drug: AZD2281
200mg oral twice daily
Active Comparator: 2
Liposomal Doxorubicin
 Drug: Liposomal Doxorubicin
50mg/m2 Monthly Intravenous
Other Name: Doxil®
Experimental: 3
AZD2281 Oral 400 mg BID
 Drug: AZD2281
400mg Oral twice daily
Other Name: Olaparib


Outcome Measures
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Progression Free Survival (PFS) [ Time Frame: Tumour assessment was to be assessed at screening, every 8 weeks during the study and at the withdrawal visit, up to 56 weeks. (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009) ]
    PFS was defined as the time to progression from the date of randomisation until the date of radiological assessment of progression per RECIST criteria or death (by any cause in the absence of progression)


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Objective Response Rate (ORR) [ Time Frame: At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009) ]
    ORR was defined according to RECIST. Complete response (CR) or partial response - (PR)- 30% decrease Patients with a best RECIST response of CR or PR had to have a confirmed response at least 28 days later.

  2. Disease Control Rate [ Time Frame: At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009) ]
    The number of patients with confirmed CR (disappearance of all target lesions) or PR (30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions ) or SD ( small changes ) >4 months, divided by the number of randomised patients

  3. Overall Duration of Response [ Time Frame: At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009) ]
    The duration of response was defined as time (months) from initial assessment of PR/CR until earliest date of objective progression or death. (Values may be underestimated as some patients had not progressed at final analysis so true duration is likely to be greater than that in database.)

  4. Best Percentage Change in Tumour Size [ Time Frame: At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009) ]
    The percentage change (reduction) from baseline in the sum of the lengths of the longest diameter (LD) of the RECIST target lesions were objectively documented, regardless of whether the patient was still taking study medication

  5. Best Percentage Change From Baseline in CA-125 Levels [ Time Frame: At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009) ]
    Best percentage change in cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) levels

  6. Confirmed RECIST Response and/or CA-125 Response [ Time Frame: At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009) ]
    The percentage of patients reporting a RECIST confirmed response and/or a CA-125 response (in the absence of progression). A CA-125 response was defined as a confirmed greater or equal to 50% reduction in CA-125.

  7. Overall Survival (OS) [ Time Frame: At the time of the cut-off for the final analysis of overall survival (30 April 2010) ]
    OS was defined as time from randomisation to date of death from any cause. Patients who had not died at time of analysis were censored at last date they were known to be alive. Median OS was not calculable for olaparib groups due to an insufficient number of deaths so the percentage of participants who died are shown along with 95% confidence intervals

  8. Best Quality of Life (QoL) Response for Trial Outcome Index (TOI) [ Time Frame: At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009) ]
    Best HRQoL response using the TOI endpoint. Improvement was defined as a change from baseline of greater than or equal to +7. The TOI score ranges from 0-100.

  9. Best QoL Response for Total Functional Analysis of Cancer Therapy - Ovarian (FACT-O) [ Time Frame: At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009) ]
    Best HRQoL response using the total FACT-O endpoint. Improvement was defined as a change from baseline of greater than or equal to +9.

  10. Best QoL Response for FACT-O Symptom Index (FOSI) [ Time Frame: At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009) ]
    Best HRQoL response using the FOSI endpoint. Improvement was defined as a change from baseline of greater than or equal to +3.


Eligibility Criteria
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 130 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Advanced ovarian cancer with positive BRCA1 or BRCA2 status
  • Progressive or recurrent disease after platinum-based chemotherapy
  • Measurable disease by RECIST

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous anthracycline treatment
  • Brain metastases
  • Less than 28 days since last treatment used to treat the disease
  • Considered a poor medical risk due to a serious uncontrolled disorder
Contacts and Locations
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00628251


Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, California
Research Site
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
Research Site
San Francisco, California, United States, 94115
United States, Florida
Research Site
Boca Raton, Florida, United States, 33428
United States, Massachusetts
Research Site
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
United States, New York
Research Site
New York, New York, United States, 10065
United States, Texas
Research Site
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
Australia
Research Site
East Melbourne, Australia, 3002
Research Site
Melbourne, Parkville, Australia, VIC 3050
Research Site
Randwick, Australia, 2031
Belgium
Research Site
Leuven, Belgium, 3000
Germany
Research Site
Köln, Germany, 50937
Research Site
München, Germany, 81377
Israel
Research Site
Haifa, Israel, 31096
Research Site
Ramat Gan, Israel, 52621
Research Site
Tel Aviv, Israel, 6423906
Poland
Research Site
Szczecin, Poland, 70-111
Spain
Research Site
Barcelona, Spain, 08035
Research Site
Hospitalet deLlobregat, Spain, 08907
Sweden
Research Site
Lund, Sweden, 22185
United Kingdom
Research Site
Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 0QQ
Research Site
Edinburgh, United Kingdom, EH4 2XR
Research Site
London, United Kingdom, SE1 9RT
Research Site
Manchester, United Kingdom, M20 4BX
Research Site
Sutton, United Kingdom, SM2 5PT
Sponsors and Collaborators
AstraZeneca
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Director: Jane Robertson, BSc, MBCHB, MD AstraZeneca
Principal Investigator: Stan Kaye, BSc, MB, FRCP, FRCR, SMedSCi Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
More Information
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information
Additional Information:

Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):

Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: AstraZeneca
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00628251    
Other Study ID Numbers: D0810C00012
First Posted: March 5, 2008    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: June 3, 2016
Last Update Posted: December 5, 2019
Last Verified: November 2019
Keywords provided by AstraZeneca:
Advanced ovarian cancer
BRCA1 protein
BRCA2 protein
Poly(ADP ribose) polymerases
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Ovarian Neoplasms
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial
Endocrine Gland Neoplasms
Neoplasms by Site
Neoplasms
Ovarian Diseases
Adnexal Diseases
Genital Neoplasms, Female
Urogenital Neoplasms
Endocrine System Diseases
Gonadal Disorders
Carcinoma
 Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
Neoplasms by Histologic Type
Doxorubicin
Liposomal doxorubicin
Olaparib
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic
Antineoplastic Agents
Topoisomerase II Inhibitors
Topoisomerase Inhibitors
Enzyme Inhibitors
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors