Citalopram to Enhance Cognition in HD (CIT-HD)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00271596

Recruitment Status : Completed

First Posted : January 2, 2006

Results First Posted : March 13, 2013

Last Update Posted : March 13, 2013

View this study on Beta.ClinicalTrials.gov

Sponsor:

Collaborators:

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

Cure Huntington's Disease Initiative (CHDI)

University of Rochester

Mayo Clinic

Information provided by (Responsible Party):

Jess G. Fiedorowicz, University of Iowa

Study Description

Brief Summary:

This research plan proposes to conduct a double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot clinical trial in 36 adults with mild Huntington's disease (HD) to address the following research aims:

To determine the effect of citalopram compared to placebo in patients with early HD on executive function and other outcome variables including functional measures (health-related quality of life, work productivity, and self-reported attention), motor performance, and psychiatric status,
To study the relationship between executive function and functional status in patients with early HD after selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment, and
To examine the effect of citalopram treatment on volumetric and metabolic (i.e, N-acetyl-aspartate concentration) measures in the neostriatum among patients with recently diagnosed Huntington's disease.

Condition or disease	Intervention/treatment	Phase
Huntington Disease Chorea Executive Dysfunction	Drug: 20mg daily citalopram Drug: Placebo	Phase 2

Detailed Description:

Specific Aims:

To examine the effects of sixteen weeks of treatment with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) citalopram compared to placebo on executive function in patients with early Huntington's disease (HD).
To study the relationship between executive function and functional status in patients with early HD after SSRI treatment.
To determine the effect of sixteen weeks of citalopram compared to placebo on other outcome variables including functional measures (health-related quality of life, work productivity, and self-reported attention), motor performance, and psychiatric status.
To examine the effect of citalopram treatment on volumetric and metabolic (i.e, N-Acetyl-Aspartate concentration) measures in the neostriatum among patients with recently diagnosed Huntington's Disease.

Main Hypotheses:

At the end of the treatment protocol, patients receiving citalopram as compared with placebo will show a significantly greater improvement on tests of executive function.
Performance on measures of executive function will be significantly associated with measures of functional status.
At the end of the treatment protocol, patients receiving citalopram as compared with placebo will show a significantly greater improvement in functional status and psychiatric ratings; motor score is not expected to change as a result of citalopram therapy.
Using structural MRI and occipital proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS), after treatment, patients with recently diagnosed Huntington's Disease will show greater changes from baseline on volumetric and metabolic (i.e., N-Acetyl-Aspartate concentration) neuroimaging measures in the neostriatum than those on placebo.

Study Design

Layout table for study information

Study Type :	Interventional (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment :	33 participants
Allocation:	Randomized
Intervention Model:	Parallel Assignment
Masking:	Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:	Treatment
Official Title:	A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study in Huntington's Disease (CIT-HD)
Study Start Date :	November 2005
Actual Primary Completion Date :	April 2011
Actual Study Completion Date :	November 2011

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus Genetics related topics: McLeod neuroacanthocytosis syndrome Huntington disease

MedlinePlus related topics: Huntington's Disease

Drug Information available for: Citalopram hydrobromide Citalopram Escitalopram Escitalopram oxalate

Genetic and Rare Diseases Information Center resources: Huntington Disease

U.S. FDA Resources

Arms and Interventions

Arm	Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Citalopram 20mg daily citalopram	Drug: 20mg daily citalopram a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment administered over 16 weeks Other Name: Celexa
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Matching daily placebo	Drug: Placebo a daily matching placebo administered over 16 weeks Other Name: Matching daily placebo

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures :

Executive Function Composite Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort. [ Time Frame: after 15 weeks of treatment ]
Full Scale Name: The Executive Composite Score (ECS). Definition: Subscales were averaged to compute this composite total score. The ECS is the weighted average of performance on 6 subtests of executive function, including (1) the Controlled Oral Word Association Test, (2) Symbol Digit Modalities test; (3) Stroop Color Word Test (Interference Trial), (4) Trail Making test (Part B), (5) Letter-Number Sequencing, and (6) Animal Naming. Construct Measured: Thinking tasks involving planning, working memory, attention, problem solving, verbal reasoning, inhibition, mental flexibility, and task switching. ECS Scale Range: The ECS score ranges from -5 to +5 on a standardized (Z) score scale, where lower scores indicate poorer performance on executive functioning tasks. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in executive functioning performance from visit 2 (week 0) to the weighted average of visits 5 (week 12) & 6 (week 15) for the citalopram versus placebo cohort.

Secondary Outcome Measures :

Letter Number Sequencing Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort [ Time Frame: after 15 weeks of treatment ]
Full Scale Name: Letter Number Sequencing (LNS) subtest from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) third edition. Definition: LNS is a task that requires the reordering of an initially unordered set of letters and numbers. Construct Measured: Working memory. LNS Score Range: Raw scores may range from 0 to 21, where lower scores indicate poorer performance in working memory. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in working memory performance from visit 2 (week 0) to the weighted average of visits 5 (week 12) & 6 (week 15) for the citalopram versus placebo cohort.
Semantic Fluency Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort [ Time Frame: after 15 weeks of treatment ]
Semantic Fluency Score. Definition: The Semantic Fluency Score is the number of words a person can produce given a category, including naming (1) Animal names, (2) Fruit names, (3) Boy names, (4) Girl names, and (5) Vegetable names. Construct Measured: Working memory and verbal initiation. Scale Range: The Semantic Fluency Score ranges from -5 to +5 on a standardized (Z) score scale, where lower scores indicate poorer performance on working memory tasks. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in working memory performance from visit 2 (week 0) where patients named fruit names to the weighted average of visits 5 (week 12) & 6 (week 15) where patients named girl names and vegetable names respectively for the citalopram versus placebo cohort.
Symbol-Digit Modalities Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort [ Time Frame: after 15 weeks of treatment ]
Full Scale Name: The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). Definition: The SDMT screens for organic cerebral dysfunction by having the examinee use a reference key to pair specific numbers with given geometric figures in 90 seconds. Construct Measured: Attention, processing speed, and working memory. SDMT Scale Range: Raw scores may range from 0 to 110, where lower scores indicate poorer performance. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in performance from visit 2 (week 0) to the weighted average of visits 5 (week 12) & 6 (week 15) for the citalopram versus placebo cohort.
Verbal Fluency Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort [ Time Frame: after 15 weeks of treatment ]
Full Scale Name: The Verbal Fluency Score (VFC). Definition: The VFC is the number of words a person can produce given a letter, including (1) Naming words that start with F, A, and S; (2) naming words that start with K, W, and R; (3) naming words that start with V, I, and P; (4) naming words that start with O, G, and B; (5) naming words that start with E, N, and T; and (6) naming words that start with J, C, and S. Construct Measured: Verbal initiation and flexibility. Scale Range: The Verbal Fluency Composite Score ranges from -5 to +5 on a standardized (Z) score scale, where lower scores indicate poorer performance. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in verbal initiation and flexibility from visit 2 (week 0) where patients named words starting with O, G, and B to the weighted average of visits 5 (week 12) and 6 (week 15) where patients named words starting with E, N, and T, and J, C, and S respectively for the citalopram versus placebo cohort.
Stroop Interference Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort [ Time Frame: after 15 weeks of treatment ]
Full Scale Name: Stroop Interference subtest from The Stroop Color and Word Test. Definition: Participants are asked to name the ink color in which a word is printed when the word itself (which is irrelevant to the task) is the name of a different color rather than the same color. For example, participants may be asked to say "red" to the word blue printed in red ink. Constructs Measured: Selective attention, response inhibition, cognitive flexibility, and processing speed. Scale Range: The Stroop Interference score ranges from -5 to +5 on a standardized (Z) score scale, where lower scores indicate poorer performance. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in attention and processing speed performance from visit 2 (week 0) to the weighted average of visits 5 (week 12) and 6 (week 15) for the citalopram versus placebo cohort.
Trails B Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort [ Time Frame: after 15 weeks of treatment ]
Full Scale Name: Trail Making Test Part B (TMT-B). Definition: The TMT-B test requires participants to "connect-the-dots" of 25 consecutive targets on a sheet of paper where the subject alternates between numbers and letters, going in both numerical and alphabetical order. Constructs Measured: Attention, set shifting, and processing speed. Scale range: The TMT-B score ranges from -5 to +5 on a standardized (Z) score scale, where lower scores indicate poorer performance. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in attention and processing speed performance from visit 2 (week 0) to the weighted average of visits 5 (week 12) and 6 (week 15) for the citalopram versus placebo cohort.
Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression Comparing Screening (Intake Visit) to Visit 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort [ Time Frame: after 15 weeks of treatment ]
Full Scale Name: Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). Definition: The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression is a clinician-administered multiple item questionnaire used to provide an indication of depression. Construct Measured: Depression. HAM-D Score Range: Raw scores may range from 0 to 54, where higher scores indicate worsening mood. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in mood from screening (intake visit) to visit 6 (week 15) for the citalopram versus placebo cohort.
Total Functional Capacity Score Comparing Baseline (Week -4) to Visits 4 (Week 6) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort [ Time Frame: after 15 weeks of treatment ]
Full Scale Name: The Total Functional Capacity (TFC) subscale from the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS). Definition: The TFC is a score that classifies five stages of Huntington's Disease and five levels of function in the domains of workplace, finances, domestic chores, activities of daily living and requirements for unskilled or skilled care. Construct Measured: Activities of Daily Living. Scale Range: The TFC score ranges from 0 to 13, where lower scores indicate poorer performance in activities of daily living. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in TFC performance from Baseline (week -4) to the weighted average of visits 4 (week 6) and 6 (week 15) for the citalopram versus placebo cohort.
Subgroup Analysis of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Comparing Screening (Intake Visit) to Visit 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort [ Time Frame: after 15 weeks of treatment ]
Full Scale Name: Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). Definition: The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression is a clinician-administered multiple item questionnaire used to provide an indication of depression. Construct Measured: Depression. HAM-D Score Range: Raw scores may range from 0 to 54, where higher scores indicate worsening mood. Change Calculation Details: This analysis was restricted to a subgroup and, accordingly, does not reflect the total number of participants as reported in the Participant Flow. This analysis compares change in mood from screening (intake visit) to visit 6 (week 15) for the citalopram versus placebo cohort.

Eligibility Criteria

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.

Layout table for eligibility information

Ages Eligible for Study:	18 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:	All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:	No

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Gene positive HD test (or, if untested, an HD diagnosis) with some abnormal motor signs (i.e., diagnostic confidence level of greater than or equal to 1 as measured by the UHDRS).
Aged between 18 and 75
Ability to provide written informed consent
Mild stage HD (Shoulson and Fahn Scale Stage 1 or 2)
Mild executive dysfunction: Participants must have complaints of poor cognition, mild functional decline, or demonstrate objective evidence of decline from their premorbid level
Participants are able to complete all study assessments

Exclusion Criteria:

Age under 18 or greater than 75
Current major depression deemed significant by the investigator at the screening visit or current suicidal ideation.
Any unstable or severe psychiatric disease including diagnoses of schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder, dementia, delirium, severe anxiety and/or substance abuse/dependence.
Current use of an SSRI or other treatment for depression (e.g., use of an MAOI) or treatment with an SSRI within the past 14 days.
Current use of St. John's wort within the past 14 days.
To ensure performance on cognitive measures are not affected by specific concomitant medications, participants taking methylphenidate, amphetamine/dextroamphetamine, atomoxetine, an acetyl cholinesterase inhibitor, an atypical antipsychotic, kava kava, Ginkgo Biloba, or an anxiolytic drug may be excluded unless their dose and dosing frequency have remained stable for 30 days prior to receiving study drug. Continued participation also requires the dose and dosing frequency remain stable throughout the study.
Patients who are pregnant, nursing, or planning to become pregnant during the study.
Patients who are unable to participate in the study assessments (cognitive, functional, psychiatric and motor scales) due to cognitive, motor, or sensory impairments (i.e., significant vision or hearing deficits).
Other serious medical conditions such as cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease; head injury deemed clinically significant by the PI; neurological disorder or insult other than HD.
Learning disability or other medical condition that is likely to affect cognitive function; history of symptoms indicative of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in childhood; or a diagnosis of ADHD.

It is important to note that participants who are unable to receive an MRI scan may still participate in this study

Contacts and Locations

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00271596

Locations

Layout table for location information

United States, Arizona
Mayo Clinic Arizona
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259
United States, Iowa
The University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
United States, New York
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, United States, 14618

Sponsors and Collaborators

University of Iowa

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

Cure Huntington's Disease Initiative (CHDI)

University of Rochester

Mayo Clinic

Investigators

Layout table for investigator information

Principal Investigator:	Leigh J Beglinger, Ph.D.	The University of Iowa Psychiatry Department
Principal Investigator:	Jess G Fiedorowicz, M.D., Ph.D.	University of Iowa Psychiatry Department
Principal Investigator:	Kevin Biglan, M.D., M.P.H.	University of Rochester
Principal Investigator:	John Caviness, M.D.	Mayo Clinic
Principal Investigator:	Ricardo Jorge, M.D.	University of Iowa Psychiatry Department

More Information

Additional Information:

The University of Iowa's Huntington's Disease Center of Excellence This link exits the ClinicalTrials.gov site

Publications:

Aylward EH, Anderson NB, Bylsma FW, Wagster MV, Barta PE, Sherr M, Feeney J, Davis A, Rosenblatt A, Pearlson GD, Ross CA. Frontal lobe volume in patients with Huntington's disease. Neurology. 1998 Jan;50(1):252-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.50.1.252.

Bauer A, Zilles K, Matusch A, Holzmann C, Riess O, von Horsten S. Regional and subtype selective changes of neurotransmitter receptor density in a rat transgenic for the Huntington's disease mutation. J Neurochem. 2005 Aug;94(3):639-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03169.x. Erratum In: J Neurochem. 2005 Aug;94(4):1167.

Bonelli RM, Wenning GK, Kapfhammer HP. Huntington's disease: present treatments and future therapeutic modalities. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004 Mar;19(2):51-62. doi: 10.1097/00004850-200403000-00001.

Como PG, Rubin AJ, O'Brien CF, Lawler K, Hickey C, Rubin AE, Henderson R, McDermott MP, McDermott M, Steinberg K, Shoulson I. A controlled trial of fluoxetine in nondepressed patients with Huntington's disease. Mov Disord. 1997 May;12(3):397-401. doi: 10.1002/mds.870120319.

Duan W, Guo Z, Jiang H, Ladenheim B, Xu X, Cadet JL, Mattson MP. Paroxetine retards disease onset and progression in Huntingtin mutant mice. Ann Neurol. 2004 Apr;55(4):590-4. doi: 10.1002/ana.20075.

Fennema-Notestine C, Archibald SL, Jacobson MW, Corey-Bloom J, Paulsen JS, Peavy GM, Gamst AC, Hamilton JM, Salmon DP, Jernigan TL. In vivo evidence of cerebellar atrophy and cerebral white matter loss in Huntington disease. Neurology. 2004 Sep 28;63(6):989-95. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000138434.68093.67.

Kish SJ, Shannak K, Hornykiewicz O. Elevated serotonin and reduced dopamine in subregionally divided Huntington's disease striatum. Ann Neurol. 1987 Sep;22(3):386-9. doi: 10.1002/ana.410220318.

Menza M, Marin H, Kaufman K, Mark M, Lauritano M. Citalopram treatment of depression in Parkinson's disease: the impact on anxiety, disability, and cognition. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004 Summer;16(3):315-9. doi: 10.1176/jnp.16.3.315.

Murman DL, Giordani B, Mellow AM, Johanns JR, Little RJ, Hariharan M, Foster NL. Cognitive, behavioral, and motor effects of the NMDA antagonist ketamine in Huntington's disease. Neurology. 1997 Jul;49(1):153-61. doi: 10.1212/wnl.49.1.153.

Naarding P, Kremer HP, Zitman FG. Huntington's disease: a review of the literature on prevalence and treatment of neuropsychiatric phenomena. Eur Psychiatry. 2001 Dec;16(8):439-45. doi: 10.1016/s0924-9338(01)00604-6.

Patel SV, Tariot PN, Asnis J. L-Deprenyl augmentation of fluoxetine in a patient with Huntington's disease. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 1996 Mar;8(1):23-6. doi: 10.3109/10401239609149087.

Ranen NG, Lipsey JR, Treisman G, Ross CA. Sertraline in the treatment of severe aggressiveness in Huntington's disease. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1996 Summer;8(3):338-40. doi: 10.1176/jnp.8.3.338.

Reynolds GP, Dalton CF, Tillery CL, Mangiarini L, Davies SW, Bates GP. Brain neurotransmitter deficits in mice transgenic for the Huntington's disease mutation. J Neurochem. 1999 Apr;72(4):1773-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.721773.x.

Reynolds GP, Pearson SJ. Decreased glutamic acid and increased 5-hydroxytryptamine in Huntington's disease brain. Neurosci Lett. 1987 Jul 22;78(2):233-8. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(87)90639-2.

Rosas HD, Koroshetz WJ, Chen YI, Skeuse C, Vangel M, Cudkowicz ME, Caplan K, Marek K, Seidman LJ, Makris N, Jenkins BG, Goldstein JM. Evidence for more widespread cerebral pathology in early HD: an MRI-based morphometric analysis. Neurology. 2003 May 27;60(10):1615-20. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000065888.88988.6e.

Shoulson I, Goldblatt D, Charlton M, Joynt RJ. Huntington's disease: treatment with muscimol, a GABA-mimetic drug. Ann Neurol. 1978 Sep;4(3):279-84. doi: 10.1002/ana.410040316.

Yohrling IV GJ, Jiang GC, DeJohn MM, Robertson DJ, Vrana KE, Cha JH. Inhibition of tryptophan hydroxylase activity and decreased 5-HT1A receptor binding in a mouse model of Huntington's disease. J Neurochem. 2002 Sep;82(6):1416-23. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.01084.x.

Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):

Beglinger LJ, Adams WH, Fiedorowicz JG, Duff K, Langbehn D, Biglan K, Caviness J, Olson B, Paulsen JS. Practice Effects and Stability of Neuropsychological and UHDRS Tests Over Short Retest Intervals in Huntington Disease. J Huntingtons Dis. 2015;4(3):251-60. doi: 10.3233/JHD-150159.

Beglinger LJ, Adams WH, Langbehn D, Fiedorowicz JG, Caviness J, Biglan K, Olson B, Paulsen JS. Does interval between screening and baseline matter in HD cognitive clinical trials? J Huntingtons Dis. 2014;3(2):139-44. doi: 10.3233/JHD-140100.

Beglinger LJ, Adams WH, Langbehn D, Fiedorowicz JG, Jorge R, Biglan K, Caviness J, Olson B, Robinson RG, Kieburtz K, Paulsen JS. Results of the citalopram to enhance cognition in Huntington disease trial. Mov Disord. 2014 Mar;29(3):401-5. doi: 10.1002/mds.25750. Epub 2013 Dec 27.

Layout table for additonal information

Responsible Party:	Jess G. Fiedorowicz, Assistant Professor, University of Iowa
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:	NCT00271596
Other Study ID Numbers:	200509746 5K23NS055733 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract ) A-2063 ( Other Identifier: CHDI Foundation )
First Posted:	January 2, 2006 Key Record Dates
Results First Posted:	March 13, 2013
Last Update Posted:	March 13, 2013
Last Verified:	February 2013

Keywords provided by Jess G. Fiedorowicz, University of Iowa:


Huntington Disease Citalopram Celexa Chorea Focus	ADD ADHD HD SSRI

Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Layout table for MeSH terms

Huntington Disease Chorea Basal Ganglia Diseases Brain Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases Nervous System Diseases Dementia Dyskinesias Movement Disorders Heredodegenerative Disorders, Nervous System Neurodegenerative Diseases Genetic Diseases, Inborn Cognition Disorders Neurocognitive Disorders	Mental Disorders Neurologic Manifestations Citalopram Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors Neurotransmitter Uptake Inhibitors Membrane Transport Modulators Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Neurotransmitter Agents Serotonin Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation Antidepressive Agents Psychotropic Drugs

To Top