Now Available: Final Rule for FDAAA 801 and NIH Policy on Clinical Trial Reporting

Third Eye Retroscope Randomized Clinical Evaluation (TERRACE)

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Avantis Medical Systems
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01044732
First received: January 6, 2010
Last updated: July 13, 2016
Last verified: July 2016
Results First Received: August 28, 2015  
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized;   Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study;   Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment;   Masking: Open Label;   Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
Condition: Colorectal Neoplasms
Intervention: Device: Third Eye Retroscope

  Participant Flow
  Hide Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations
No text entered.

Pre-Assignment Details
Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment
No text entered.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Group A - SC Followed by TEC

Standard colonoscopy (SC) followed by Third Eye colonoscopy (TEC)

Third Eye colonoscopy: Examination of the colon with a Third Eye Retroscope used in combination with a colonoscope to provide second, retrograde view of the colon

Group B - TEC Followed by SC

Third Eye colonoscopy (TEC) followed by standard colonoscopy (SC)

Third Eye colonoscopy: Examination of the colon with a Third Eye Retroscope used in combination with a colonoscope to provide second, retrograde view of the colon


Participant Flow:   Overall Study
    Group A - SC Followed by TEC     Group B - TEC Followed by SC  
STARTED     222     226  
COMPLETED     173     176  
NOT COMPLETED     49     50  
Lost to Follow-up                 2                 1  
Physician Decision                 5                 3  
Protocol Violation                 11                 12  
Withdrawal by Subject                 0                 1  
Inadequate bowel preparation                 11                 17  
Inability to reach cecum                 5                 2  
Technical error or malfunction                 15                 14  



  Baseline Characteristics
  Hide Baseline Characteristics

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
Intention-to-treat population, i.e., those who were actually examined during the study

Reporting Groups
  Description
Group A - SC Followed by TEC

Standard colonoscopy (SC) followed by Third Eye colonoscopy (TEC)

Third Eye colonoscopy: Examination of the colon with a Third Eye Retroscope used in combination with a colonoscope to provide second, retrograde view of the colon

Group B - TEC Followed by SC

Third Eye colonoscopy (TEC) followed by standard colonoscopy (SC)

Third Eye colonoscopy: Examination of the colon with a Third Eye Retroscope used in combination with a colonoscope to provide second, retrograde view of the colon

Total Total of all reporting groups

Baseline Measures
    Group A - SC Followed by TEC     Group B - TEC Followed by SC     Total  
Number of Participants  
[units: participants]
  184     188     372  
Age  
[units: years]
Mean (Standard Deviation)
  57.6  (9.8)     58.0  (9.7)     57.8  (9.7)  
Gender  
[units: participants]
     
Female     69     59     128  
Male     115     129     244  
Region of Enrollment  
[units: participants in ITT population]
     
Netherlands     19     22     41  
Belgium     24     26     50  
United States     114     111     225  
Italy     25     28     53  
United Kingdom     2     1     3  
Indication for colonoscopy procedure  
[units: participants in ITT population]
     
Screening     97     92     189  
Surveillance     41     55     96  
Diagnostic     46     41     87  



  Outcome Measures
  Show All Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   Detection Rates for Adenomas and for Total Polyps   [ Time Frame: Acute - subjects were followed for the duration of the procedures, an average of 40 minutes. ]

2.  Secondary:   Times for Withdrawal Phase and for Complete Procedure   [ Time Frame: Acute - subjects were followed for the duration of the procedures, an average of 40 minutes. ]


  Serious Adverse Events


  Other Adverse Events


  Limitations and Caveats
  Hide Limitations and Caveats

Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
With mean subject age of 57.8 years, population was younger than in some studies, so polyp prevalence might be below average.


  More Information
  Hide More Information

Certain Agreements:  
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.


Results Point of Contact:  
Name/Title: Jack Higgins, MD - Chief Medical Officer
Organization: Avantis Medical Systems
phone: 6508239216
e-mail: jhiggins@avantismedical.com


Publications of Results:

Responsible Party: Avantis Medical Systems
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01044732     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: Avantis TER-08-06
Study First Received: January 6, 2010
Results First Received: August 28, 2015
Last Updated: July 13, 2016
Health Authority: United States: Food and Drug Administration