We're building a better ClinicalTrials.gov. Check it out and tell us what you think!
Try the New Site
We're building a modernized ClinicalTrials.gov! Visit Beta.ClinicalTrials.gov to try the new functionality.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

VIdeo Telehealth in ALzheimer's: NeuroPsychology (VITAL-NP) (VITAL-NP)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05379023
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : May 18, 2022
Last Update Posted : September 6, 2022
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
University of Colorado, Denver

Brief Summary:
The overarching goal of this study is to a) assess the feasibility and preliminary validity of home-based delivery of TeleNP to patients with suspected Alzheimer's Disease (AD), referred for cognitive assessments in a Neurology Clinic; and b) elucidate whether TeleNP is equivalent to face-to-face evaluation (FF) for diagnostic adjudication of atypical versus typical AD.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Suspected Typical Alzheimer's Disease (AD) Suspected Atypical Alzheimer's Disease (AD) Behavioral: Face-to-face evaluation (FF) Behavioral: TeleNP evaluation Not Applicable

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 80 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
Masking: Single (Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
Official Title: Integrating Home-Based Video Teleneuropsychology Into Clinical Practice: Typical Versus Atypical Alzheimer's Disease
Actual Study Start Date : June 27, 2022
Estimated Primary Completion Date : March 2024
Estimated Study Completion Date : March 2024


Arm Intervention/treatment
Face-to-face evaluation (FF), TeleNP evaluation Behavioral: Face-to-face evaluation (FF)
The intervention is the assessment modality. The control condition is face-to-face evaluation (FF).

Behavioral: TeleNP evaluation
The intervention is the assessment modality. The intervention condition is TeleNP evaluation.

TeleNP evaluation, Face-to-face evaluation (FF) Behavioral: Face-to-face evaluation (FF)
The intervention is the assessment modality. The control condition is face-to-face evaluation (FF).

Behavioral: TeleNP evaluation
The intervention is the assessment modality. The intervention condition is TeleNP evaluation.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Equivalence of Cognitive Test Results Across Testing Modalities as measured by Neuropsychological Test Mean Scores [ Time Frame: After the exposure to each health delivery conditions, Face-to-face evaluation (FF) and TeleNP evaluation, at Week 1 and Weeks 5-7 ]
    Norm-referenced Z-scores for clinically validated cognitive measures of Memory, Executive Functions, Language, and Spatial Abilities will be compared across both conditions.

  2. Equivalence of Neuropsychologist Diagnosis Across Testing Modalities as measured by Neuropsychologist-Determined Diagnosis [ Time Frame: After the exposure to each health delivery conditions, Face-to-face evaluation (FF) and TeleNP evaluation, at Week 1 and Weeks 5-7 ]
    Neuropsychologist-determined diagnosis (i.e., typical AD, atypical/complex AD, not AD) will be compared across both conditions whether TeleNP alters assessment of patient diagnosis.

  3. Equivalence of Neuropsychologist Appraisal of Severity Across Testing Modalities as measured by Neuropsychologist-Determined Severity [ Time Frame: After the exposure to each health delivery conditions, Face-to-face evaluation (FF) and TeleNP evaluation, at Week 1 and Weeks 5-7 ]
    Neuropsychologist-determined severity (i.e., subjective cognitive concerns; MCI; mild dementia) will be compared across both conditions whether TeleNP alters assessment of patient severity.

  4. Acceptability and Feasibility of Intervention Measures as measured by 4-item Acceptability and Feasibility of Intervention Measures Scale [ Time Frame: After the exposure to each health delivery conditions, Face-to-face evaluation (FF) and TeleNP evaluation, at Week 1 and Weeks 5-7 ]
    The 4-item Acceptability and Feasibility of Intervention Measures Scale is used for rating all participants and care partners' perspective on the acceptability and feasibility of the Face-to-face evaluation (FF) and TeleNP evaluation as assessed using a 5-point Likert scale at Week 1 or Weeks 5-7, depending on randomization. Scores range from "Completely disagree" (1) to "Completely agree" (5).

  5. Acceptability and Feasibility of Intervention Measures as Measured by 19-item UTAUT questionnaire adapted to TeleNP [ Time Frame: After the exposure to the TeleNP evaluation (up to Week 7) ]
    The 19-item UTAUT questionnaire adapted to TeleNP is used for rating all participants and care partners' perspective on the acceptability and feasibility of TeleNP evaluation as assessed using a 5-point Likert scale at Week 1 or Weeks 5-7, depending on randomization. Scores range from "Strongly disagree" (1) to "Strongly agree" (5).

  6. User experience of patient and any associated care partners for each health delivery conditions, Face-to-face evaluation (FF) and TeleNP evaluation [ Time Frame: 1 week after the exposure to each health delivery conditions, Face-to-face evaluation (FF) and TeleNP evaluation ]
    A subset of diverse patients (n=20) and any associated care partners will be invited to participate in semi-structured interviews with the research coordinator within one week of completing both FF and TeleNP conditions. These interviews will focus on the participant's user experience, guided by UTAUT domains and specific attention to home setting and potential care partner involvement.

  7. User experience of neuropsychologist for each health delivery conditions, Face-to-face evaluation (FF) and TeleNP evaluation [ Time Frame: Up to two years ]
    The neuropsychologists will also participate in brief, separate interviews to garner information regarding feasibility, acceptability, and strengths/weaknesses of TeleNP after the completion of 20, 40, 60, and 80 TeleNP evaluations.

  8. User experience of psychometrist for each health delivery conditions, Face-to-face evaluation (FF) and TeleNP evaluation [ Time Frame: Up to two years ]
    The psychometrist will also participate in brief, separate interviews to garner information regarding feasibility, acceptability, and strengths/weaknesses of TeleNP; these interviews will be conducted by Dr. Hillary Lum after the completion of 20, 40, 60, and 80 TeleNP evaluations.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   60 Years to 90 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals age 60 to 90 years who are undergoing evaluation for possible AD and whose severity ranges from MCI to mild dementia.
  • Individuals must carry a diagnosis of either suspected typical AD or atypical AD, based on the referring neurologist's diagnosis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with moderate to severe levels of dementia and individuals with active delirium (per neurologist's determination).
  • Individuals who are legally blind or deaf, due to the auditory and visual components of the study.
  • Individuals with a brain tumor and individuals who have a confirmed nonAD neurological diagnosis (e.g, Multiple Sclerosis; FTD).
  • Individuals who are being evaluated outside of the UCH Memory Disorders Clinic.
  • Individuals who report active (i.e., within the last 6 months) substance use of illicit drugs such as cocaine or methamphetamines, or who carry a diagnosis of a major psychiatric disorder (e.g., schizophrenia; bipolar disorder).

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT05379023


Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Jennifer Krupa, BA 970-633-0216 Jennifer.Krupa@cuanschutz.edu
Contact: Neurology Research Partners 303-724-4644 neuroresearch@cuanschutz.edu

Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, Colorado
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (CU-AMC) Recruiting
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
Contact: Jennifer Krupa, BA    970-633-0216    Jennifer.Krupa@cuanschutz.edu   
Sponsors and Collaborators
University of Colorado, Denver
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Brianne Bettcher, PhD University of Colorado - Anschutz Medical Campus
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: University of Colorado, Denver
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05379023    
Other Study ID Numbers: 21-5037
R21AG072153 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract )
First Posted: May 18, 2022    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: September 6, 2022
Last Verified: September 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Yes

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease
Dementia
Brain Diseases
Central Nervous System Diseases
Nervous System Diseases
Tauopathies
Neurodegenerative Diseases
Neurocognitive Disorders
Mental Disorders