We're building a better ClinicalTrials.gov. Check it out and tell us what you think!
Try the New Site
We're building a modernized ClinicalTrials.gov! Visit Beta.ClinicalTrials.gov to try the new functionality.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Carry-over Effects of Repetitively Applied Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation on Spasticity (SCS-CorE)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03815721
Recruitment Status : Withdrawn (Decision of the 2 PI's)
First Posted : January 24, 2019
Last Update Posted : March 16, 2023
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Medical University of Vienna
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Swiss Paraplegic Centre Nottwil

Brief Summary:
Spinal cord injury is a devastating condition, causing substantial impairment of vital body functions caudal to the lesion. A major cause of disability stems from spasticity, a common secondary sequelae. Its various clinical manifestations include spasms, clonus, and resistance to passive movements, and often present a major hindrance in rehabilitation, further deteriorate residual motor performance, and negatively impact independence and quality of life. Despite its high prevalence, successful management of spasticity has remained difficult. Standard-of-care treatment modalities are often insufficient or bear the risk of undesirable side effects further accentuating paresis. Epidural stimulation of the lumbar spinal cord via implanted electrodes provides for an alternative approach. It works through modifying the dysregulated neural signal processing of spared spinal circuitry caudal to the injury. Its ameliorative effects on severe lower-limb spasticity have been repetitively reported. Yet, epidural spinal cord stimulation in motor disorders is still off-label, applied in relatively few patients only, also because of its invasive character, the time consuming testing phase for its effective application, and the lack of markers to identify responders in advance. With the development of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation, a method became available to activate the same input structures to the lumbar spinal cord as with epidural stimulation and hence to induce similar neuromodulatory effects, yet non-invasively, using standard equipment available at rehabilitation centers. A recent proof-of-concept study has shown that a single 30-minute session of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation controlled various clinical signs of spasticity and augmented residual motor control in spinal cord injured individuals for several hours beyond its application. Further, in one subject, the stimulation was repetitively applied for six weeks, resulting in cumulative therapeutic effects persisting for 10 days after its discontinuation. These observations strongly suggest that the stimulation can induce beneficial neuroplastic adaptations of spared spinal systems and their interaction with residual supraspinal control. The proposed research aims at studying the reproducibility of these findings in a statistically sound cohort of individuals with spinal cord injury and testing the applicability and acceptance of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation as a home-based therapy.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Spinal Cord Injuries Spasticity, Muscle Device: Stimulette r2x+ Not Applicable

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 0 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Carry-over Effects of Repetitively Applied Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation on Spasticity and Residual Motor Control in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injured Individuals
Actual Study Start Date : January 7, 2019
Estimated Primary Completion Date : December 2023
Estimated Study Completion Date : June 2024

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: daily stimulation
30-minute sessions of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation using the Stimulette r2x+ will be repetitively applied 7 times per week.
Device: Stimulette r2x+
device for repetitive transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation

Experimental: stimulation every other day
30-minute sessions of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation using the Stimulette r2x+ will be repetitively applied 3 times per week.
Device: Stimulette r2x+
device for repetitive transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change in spasticity index [ Time Frame: from day 1 to day 57 ]
    Spasticity index based on the Wartenberg pendulum test: For the pendulum test, subjects will be in a supported sitting position with the trunk reclined approximately 30°. The examiner will lift one leg to a horizontal position, release it, and let it oscillate passively until it stops. The pendulum test will be repeated three times on each side, separated by phases of relaxation. The spasticity index is calculated subtracting the knee angle of the initial horizontal leg position from the peak flexion angle of the first swing divided by the final knee resting angle. Scores ≥ 1 denote non-spastic conditions, and 0 extreme spasticity.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change in numeric rating scale spasticity [ Time Frame: day 1, 8, 29, 50 and 57 ]
    The severity of spasticity is rated using a numeric rating scale from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 10. Higher values represent worse outcome.

  2. Change in Modified Ashworth Scale [ Time Frame: from day 1 to day 57 ]
    The resistance to passive movement will be clinically graded according to the Modified Ashworth Scale. Individual scores from both legs will be summed (with a value of 1.5 for the 1+ scoring category) to result in a single Modified Ashworth Scale-sum score (0-96; 0, no increase in muscle tone) per assessment. Higher values represent worse outcome.

  3. Change in adductor tone rating [ Time Frame: from day 1 to day 57 ]
    5-point ordinal scale describing adductor tone during passive abduction (0: normal tone - 4: maximal tone). Higher values represent worse outcome.

  4. Change in Penn Spasm Frequency Scale [ Time Frame: from day 1 to day 57 ]
    5-point scale rating the frequency and severity of spasms (0: no spasms - 4: more than 10 spasms per hour). Higher values represent worse outcome.

  5. Change in resistance of the lower limbs [ Time Frame: from day 1 to day 57 ]
    Measure of the resistance of the lower limbs to manipulation performed by a robotic system (MotionMaker, SWORTEC SA). The MotionMaker measures torque (N) and power output (W).

  6. Change in 6-minute walk test [ Time Frame: from day 1 to day 57 ]
    distance in meters walked over a span of 6 minutes

  7. Change in Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II Scale [ Time Frame: from day 1 to day 57 ]
    21-point ordinal scale that rates the extent and nature of assistance (e.g., walker, crutches, cane, braces, physical assistance) required to complete the 10-m walk test (0: unable to complete the test - 20: ambulated without any assistance). Higher values represent better outcome.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • motor and sensory incomplete spinal cord injury classified as grade C or D on the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale
  • neurological level of spinal cord injury: third cervical to tenth thoracic segment
  • chronic condition (≥ 12 months post-spinal cord injury)
  • preserved segmental and cutaneo-muscular reflexes in the lower limbs
  • able to be verticalized for 6 minutes (with walking aids)
  • preserved joint mobility, no musculoskeletal diseases
  • spasticity (with/without antispasticity medication)
  • stable antispasmodic medication one month prior to as well as during study participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • neuromuscular diseases, e.g., amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Parkinson's disease, Guillain-Barré syndrome, muscular dystrophy
  • dermatological issues at the stimulation site
  • acute urinary tract infection at study entry
  • active implants (e.g., cardiac pacemaker, drug pump)
  • passive implants between the ninth thoracic level and the first lumbal level (e.g. metal screws/plates for surgical stabilization of spinal fractures)
  • malignant diseases
  • heart insufficiency
  • potential pregnancy (pregnancy test to be conducted as part of the first evaluation)

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03815721


Locations
Layout table for location information
Switzerland
Swiss Paraplegic Centre
Nottwil, LU, Switzerland, 6207
Sponsors and Collaborators
Swiss Paraplegic Centre Nottwil
Medical University of Vienna
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Ursula Hofstötter Medical University Vienna
Principal Investigator: Angela Frotzler Swiss Paraplegic Centre
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Swiss Paraplegic Centre Nottwil
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03815721    
Other Study ID Numbers: 2016-16
First Posted: January 24, 2019    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: March 16, 2023
Last Verified: March 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Muscle Spasticity
Spinal Cord Injuries
Spinal Cord Diseases
Central Nervous System Diseases
Nervous System Diseases
Trauma, Nervous System
Wounds and Injuries
Muscular Diseases
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Muscle Hypertonia
Neuromuscular Manifestations
Neurologic Manifestations