Two Point Discrimination (TPD)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03686748|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : September 27, 2018
Last Update Posted : January 31, 2020
Pain in both youth and adults is a complex, subjective and personal experience, and remains poorly understood. One particularly perplexing dimension of some forms of pain is the tendency of pain to spread outside of an affected body site to adjacent location, and then to unaffected body sites. Such widespread pain may reflect an altered spatial tuning of somatosensory processing, such that lateral inhibition is diminished, thereby allowing pain to spread. To date, no therapies exist which are designed specifically to diminish or even reverse the spatial spread of pain. However, training in two-point discrimination holds the potential to retune spatial aspects of somatosensory processing and may represent a novel therapy for widespread pain. Thus, the present investigation will test the following aims:
Aim 1. Do youth with chronic pain have disrupted spatial tuning of somatosensory processing? Deficits in two point tactile discrimination have long been noted in adults with chronic pain, but such deficits remain poorly documented in pediatric chronic pain patients. In order to determine if such deficits exist, youth with both chronic pain and healthy youth will undergo assessment of two point discrimination thresholds.
Aim 2. Does two-point discrimination training result in diminished pain and disability in youth with somatic pain? After initial characterization of tactile discrimination thresholds, youth with chronic pain will participate in multiple sessions of either two-point discrimination training or a single-point spatially-directed attentional control condition. Training will involve up to 9 additional sessions. Efficacy of training will be assessed by 1) reductions in the spatial extent of pain, 2) reductions in pain intensity and unpleasantness, and 3) reductions in pain-related disability.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Amplified Musculoskeletal Pain Syndrome (AMPS) Low Back Pain Fibromyalgia Chronic Widespread Pain||Behavioral: Two-point discrimination training Behavioral: One-point discrimination training||Early Phase 1|
STUDY DESIGN Prior to commencing this investigation, investigators will optimize the tactile discrimination threshold testing (i.e. as per baseline visit, below), and the training conditions, in up to ten participants (patients and/or healthy controls). This will serve as a pilot to refine operational aspects of study procedures before investigators commence the main investigation proposed herein. Following this, youth with either chronic pain (ages 10-17, n=40) or healthy youth (ages 10-17, n=20) will undergo assessments of two-point and single-point discrimination thresholds in an initial session (Aim 1). After this initial session, youth with chronic pain will participate in up to 9 additional sessions of attentional training (Aim 2). These chronic pain patients will be randomized to either two-point discrimination training (n=20) or a single-point spatially-directed attentional control condition (n=20). Participants will not be informed of which intervention they will receive (single-blind study). Psychological questionnaires will be completed in the first and last sessions in order to determine how these variables relate to tactile discrimination and response to training.
STUDY INTERVENTIONS 5.1 Two Point Discrimination Training: Two-point discrimination threshold (TPD) training may be performed 1) at spatial locations remote from pain, 2) at spatial locations adjacent to the region of pain, and/or 3) at spatial locations in the site of pain, if the participant will tolerate it. TPD is defined as the smallest distance between two points at which someone can recognize two points, and not one, touching their skin. As such this is a test of one's ability to identify separate stimulation of two discrete areas, and relies heavily on lateral inhibition. Highly precise mechanical calipers will be gently placed onto the skin and the distance between the prongs will be increased/decreased. After repeated decreases and increases in the distance between the prongs, the TPD will be deemed as the distance at which participants consistently report two points instead of one. One-point stimuli will be interleaved to serve as a control condition. Participants will be informed immediately of correct and incorrect responses as part of the discrimination training.
5.2 Control Stimulation: Participants will undergo a single-point discrimination training at the same sites as described above. Probes of different sizes will be used for this portion - a small diameter probe (~1-5 mm) and a large diameter probe (~6-50mm). The probes will be gently placed in contact with the participants' skin, and the participant will be instructed to respond if they were contacted with the small or large probe. Participants will be informed immediately of correct and incorrect responses as part of the discrimination training.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||60 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Intervention Model Description:||Two group, single blind for chronic pain patients receiving intervention, additional basic science component with baseline comparisons between patients and healthy controls.|
Participant in the Chronic Pain Group are initially blinded to the intervention they will be receiving in the study.
Healthy participants under go all assessments in the study.
|Official Title:||Retuning the Nervous System in Youth With Chronic Pain|
|Actual Study Start Date :||July 21, 2018|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||July 17, 2021|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||July 16, 2023|
Experimental: Two-point intervention
Two point discrimination training.
Behavioral: Two-point discrimination training
Patients will undergo multiple sessions of two-point discrimination training.
Active Comparator: One-point intervention
One point discrimination of size of probe
Behavioral: One-point discrimination training
Patients will undergo multiple sessions of one-point discrimination training.
No Intervention: Healthy Controls
Observational component of differences in discrimination between chronic pain patients and healthy controls.
- Change in spatial extent of pain from baseline visit to final visit [ Time Frame: baseline to final visit which is up to 5 weeks from baseline ]total area of body affected by pain
- Change in pain ratings from baseline visit to final visit [ Time Frame: baseline to final visit which is up to 5 weeks from baseline ]Ratings of current pain intensity on a non-numerical visual analog scale ranging from "not at all intense" to "most intense pain sensation imaginable" and of pain unpleasantness on a non-numerical visual analog scale ranging from "not at all unpleasant" to "most unpleasant pain imaginable".
- Change in pain-related disability from baseline visit to final visit [ Time Frame: baseline to final visit which is up to 5 weeks from baseline ]pain-related disability as assessed by the Functional Disability Index
- Change in two point discrimination threshold from baseline visit to final visit [ Time Frame: baseline to final visit which is up to 5 weeks from baseline ]Calipers moving at fixed distances to determine threshold of two point detection
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03686748
|Contact: Geraldine C Schulzeemail@example.com|
|Contact: Eric Leonfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|United States, Ohio|
|Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center||Recruiting|
|Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229|
|Contact: Geraldine C Schulze, BS 513-517-0593 Geraldine.Schulze@cchmc.org|
|Contact: Eric Leon, BA 513-517-0594 Eric.Leon@cchmc.org|
|Principal Investigator: Robert C Coghill, PHD|
|Principal Investigator:||Robert C Coghill, Ph.D.||Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati|