The Predictive Value of the Heart Rate Response to Breathing Maneuvers for Inducible Myocardial Perfusion Deficits (SCREEN-MORE)
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05516615 |
Recruitment Status :
Recruiting
First Posted : August 25, 2022
Last Update Posted : March 15, 2023
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Coronary Artery Disease | Other: 4 minute breathing maneuver |
Study Type : | Observational |
Estimated Enrollment : | 86 participants |
Observational Model: | Other |
Time Perspective: | Cross-Sectional |
Official Title: | The Predictive Value of the Heart Rate Response to Breathing Maneuvers for Inducible Myocardial Perfusion Deficits |
Actual Study Start Date : | July 14, 2020 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date : | September 30, 2023 |
Estimated Study Completion Date : | September 30, 2023 |

Group/Cohort | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Healthy volunteers
|
Other: 4 minute breathing maneuver
The 4-minute breathing maneuver comprised of 2 minutes of normal breathing and 1-min hyperventilation (rate of 30 breaths or more per minute) followed by a maximal breath-hold. |
Patient population
|
Other: 4 minute breathing maneuver
The 4-minute breathing maneuver comprised of 2 minutes of normal breathing and 1-min hyperventilation (rate of 30 breaths or more per minute) followed by a maximal breath-hold. |
- Assess the negative predictive value of the heart rate acceleration in response to 1-min hyperventilation [ Time Frame: June 2020 - August 2021 ]
To rule out the presence of inducible myocardial perfusion deficit in patients with suspected coronary artery disease compared to healthy volunteers
A ROC analysis will provide an optimal cut-point value for the level of heart rate acceleration in response to 1-min hyperventilation to identify its ability to rule out myocardial perfusion deficit
- To assess the negative predictive value of the heart rate recovery in response to maximal voluntary breath-hold [ Time Frame: June 2020 - August 2021 ]
To rule out the presence of inducible myocardial perfusion deficit in patients with suspected coronary artery disease compared to healthy volunteers
A ROC analysis will provide an optimal cut-point value for the level of heart rate recovery in response to maximal voluntary breath-hold to identify its ability to rule out myocardial perfusion deficit
- To assess the negative predictive value of heart rate variability during 4-min breathing maneuver to rule out the presence of inducible myocardial perfusion deficit in patients with suspected coronary artery disease compared to healthy volunteers [ Time Frame: June 2020 - August 2021 ]ROC analysis will provide an optimal cut-point value for heart rate variability during 4-min breathing maneuver to identify its ability to rule out myocardial perfusion deficit
- To assess the negative predictive value of the combination of INTERHEART risk score and HR response to breathing maneuver to rule out the presence of inducible myocardial perfusion deficit [ Time Frame: June 2020 - August 2021 ]ROC analysis will provide an optimal cut-point value for the combination of INTERHEART risk score and HR response to breathing maneuver to identify its ability to rule out myocardial perfusion deficit
- To compare the myocardial oxygenation changes in OS-CMR images between healthy volunteers and patients with suspected or known CAD [ Time Frame: June 2020 - August 2021 ]A student's t-test will compare the myocardial oxygenation changes between healthy volunteers and patients with suspected or known CAD
- To assess the relationship between myocardial oxygenation changes in OS-CMR images with perfusion deficit in adenosine stress first-pass perfusion MRI [ Time Frame: June 2020 - August 2021 ]Pearson Correlation Coefficient will assess the correlation between myocardial oxygenation changes in OS-CMR with perfusion deficits in adenosine stress first-pass perfusion MRI

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 35 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Sampling Method: | Probability Sample |
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Healthy volunteers:
- Aged > 35
- No known current or pre-existing problems that would affect the cardiovascular or respiratory system
Patient population:
- Aged > 35
- Clinically indicated referral for adenosine stress first-pass perfusion MRI in subjects with known or suspected coronary artery disease
Exclusion Criteria:
Healthy Volunteers:
- MR incompatible devices such as pacemakers, defibrillators, implanted material, or foreign bodies.
- Consumption of caffeine (coffee, tea, cocoa, chocolate, "energy drink") during the 12 hours prior to the exam
- Presence of cardiovascular disease.
- Regular nicotine consumption during the last 6 months
Patient Population:
- MR incompatible devices such as pacemakers, defibrillators, implanted material, or foreign bodies.
- Vasoactive medication (e.g. nitrate, beta-blocker, calcium channel blocker) during the 12 hours prior to the exam.
- Consumption of caffeine (coffee, tea, cocoa, chocolate, "energy drink") during the 12 hours prior to the exam
- Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), or previous Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
- Previous myocardial infarction within one month
- Clinically unstable condition
- Significant or uncontrolled arrhythmia
- Patients who are pregnant
- Active myocarditis, constrictive pericarditis, any cardiomyopathy, cardiac or systemic amyloidosis
- Left bundle branch block (LBBB)
- Established valvular regurgitation or stenosis abnormality above moderate severity
- Patients with a known history of heart failure (Ejection fraction<40%)

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT05516615
Canada, Quebec | |
The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center | Recruiting |
Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H4A 3J1 | |
Contact: Mahya Khaki (438) 408-2473 mahya.khaki@mail.mcgill.ca | |
Contact: Elizabeth Konidis 514-934-1934 ext 37305 elisavet.konidis@muhc.mcgill.ca | |
Principal Investigator: Matthias Friedrich |
Responsible Party: | Matthias Friedrich, Principal Investigator, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT05516615 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
2020-6487 |
First Posted: | August 25, 2022 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | March 15, 2023 |
Last Verified: | March 2023 |
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
Plan to Share IPD: | No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
Coronary Artery Disease Coronary Disease Myocardial Ischemia Heart Diseases |
Cardiovascular Diseases Arteriosclerosis Arterial Occlusive Diseases Vascular Diseases |