Preoperative Exercise for Patients Undergoing Complex Cancer Surgery (PRE-HIIT)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03978325|
Recruitment Status : Not yet recruiting
First Posted : June 7, 2019
Last Update Posted : June 7, 2019
Treatment for people with cancer of the lung or the oesophagus (food-pipe) often involves surgery. This surgery is complex and there is a high risk that patients will develop severe complications afterwards, leading to a longer hospital stay and higher hospital costs, and impacting greatly on recovery and quality of life. If patients' lungs and heart can be optimised before surgery, then recovery may be improved. While fitness can be improved by exercise, the lead-in time to surgery following a cancer diagnosis is often very short, and research is needed to examine what types of exercise might be most effective at increasing fitness over a short period.
This project will investigate if high intensity interval training (HIIT) can increase fitness levels in people scheduled for surgery for cancer of the oesophagus or the lungs. HIIT alternates between periods of high intensity exercise, cycling on a stationary bike, followed by a period of more relaxed exercise. This approach is known to improve fitness but has not previously been investigated in patients awaiting complex cancer surgery.
Groups will be compared for changes in pre-surgery fitness levels, any complications they may experience after surgery, general physical recovery after surgery and the cost of care after surgery. The investigators anticipate that patients who undergo HIIT before surgery will have less complications and better recovery after surgery, a significantly improved quality of life, and lower costs of care.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Postoperative Complications Physical Activity Surgery--Complications||Other: Control Other: Exercise - HIIT Intervention||Not Applicable|
Patients with cancer of the lung or oesophagus, undergoing curative treatment, usually require a thoracotomy and a complex oncological resection. These surgeries carry a risk of major morbidity and mortality, and risk assessment, preoperative optimisation, and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are modern approaches to optimise outcomes. Pre-operative fitness is an established predictor of postoperative outcome, accordingly targeting pre-operative fitness through exercise prehabilitation has logical appeal. Exercise prehabilitation is challenging to implement however due to the short opportunity for intervention between diagnosis and surgery. Therefore, individually prescribed, intensive exercise training protocols which convey clinically meaningful improvements in cardiopulmonary fitness over a short period need to be investigated. This project will examine the influence of exercise prehabilitation on physiological outcomes and postoperative recovery, evaluation of health economics, the impact of the programme on hospital costs.
This study will take the form of a randomised controlled trial aimed primarily at improving pre-operative fitness with high intensity interval training (HIIT). HIIT prescribes aerobic exercise which alternates between periods of high intensity training and active recovery. This form of exercise training stimulates greater improvements in cardiopulmonary fitness over short periods compared to continuous aerobic training and therefore may be ideally suited to exercise prehabilitation. The primary outcome, cardiopulmonary fitness, will be measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing and explored further using a suite of pulmonary and physical performance measures. Secondary outcomes will examine the impact of individually prescribed HIIT on postoperative outcome, postoperative physical recovery, restoration of pre-treatment fitness levels and both acute and sub-acute hospital costs. The investigators anticipate that this mode of exercise prehabilitation will attenuate postoperative risk and improve postoperative recovery, thus improving patient quality of life and having considerable economic benefits for the healthcare system.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||78 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)|
|Official Title:||Preoperative Exercise to Improve Fitness in Patients Undergoing Complex Surgery for Cancer of the Lung or Oesophagus|
|Estimated Study Start Date :||June 2019|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||December 2021|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||May 2022|
Active Comparator: Control
This arm will complete a standard prehabilitation intervention.
The control group will receive standard pre-operative care. This involves standard pre-operative advice and a moderate intensity preoperative exercise programme.
Experimental: HIIT Intervention
This group will complete a pre-operative high intensity interval training programme.
Other: Exercise - HIIT Intervention
The HIIT intervention will take the form of a supervised programme, completed for at least two weeks, up to 5 days per week preoperatively. The HIIT intervention will be performed on a cycle ergometer. Exercise sessions will be individually supervised and scheduled at a time of convenience for each participant. Each exercise session will last 40 minutes and will include warm-up, exercise training and cool-down components. Lactate threshold, measured during the baseline CPT, will be used to determine the exercise intensity.
The training protocol will prescribe 15 second intervals of exercise and passive recovery. The highest resistance reached during the baseline CPET (measured in watts) will be recorded as the peak power output (PPO). During training, participants will undergo a 5-minute warm-up at 50% PPO, followed by up to 30 minutes of HIIT with intervals of 15 seconds at 100% PPO with 15 second recovery periods at 0 watts.
- Change in Cardiorespiratory Fitness [ Time Frame: At diagnosis (Dx), baseline (T0), immediately post-intervention (T1) ]Cardiorespiratory fitness will be determined by Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET)
- Clavien-Dindo Scale [ Time Frame: At hospital discharge (approximately 7-14 days postoperatively) ]Measurement of the most severe complication that occurs in the postoperative period. The ordinal scale is divided into seven grades (Grade I-V, two sub-groups each for Grade III and IV), ranging from Grade I, which considers any deviation from normal, to Grade V, which describes death of the patient.
- Change in the Post-Operative Morbidity Score (POMS) [ Time Frame: On postoperative day 5, postoperative day 7 and at hospital discharge (approximately 7-14 days postoperatively) ]The POMS is a nine-domain tool that prospectively describes and records in-hospital postoperative complications following major surgery.
- The Comprehensive Classification Index (CCI) [ Time Frame: At hospital discharge (approximately 7-14 days postoperatively) ]This is a summary of overall morbidity including the type, number and severity of each complication experienced during the postoperative period.
- Change in Pulmonary function [ Time Frame: At diagnosis (Dx), baseline (T0), immediately post-intervention (T1) ]Pulmonary function will be measured as the first step of the CPET. This will be used to determine forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume at 1s (FEV1) and the ratio of FEV1/FVC.
- Change in Maximum Inspiratory pressure [ Time Frame: At diagnosis (Dx), baseline (T0), immediately post-intervention (T1) ]PImax will measured using a PowerBreathe K-series portable respiratory pressure metre. Patients will be measured at residual volume during a forceful inspiratory manoeuvre while resting in a seated position.
- Change in Muscle strength [ Time Frame: At diagnosis (Dx), baseline (T0), immediately post-intervention (T1) ]Quadriceps muscle strength will be measured by 1 repetition maximum (1RM) in kg's using a horizontal leg extension. The 1RM is defined as the highest load that can be lifted through full range of movement at one time.
- Change in Self reported physical activity: International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) [ Time Frame: At diagnosis (Dx), baseline (T0), immediately post-intervention (T1) as well as post-operative day 30 ]This questionnaire evaluates activity in metabolic equivalent (MET)-hours per week over the previous seven days. The questionnaire also quantifies average weekend and weekday sitting time. The questionnaire also quantifies average weekend and weekday sitting time.
- Change in Self reported functional recovery [ Time Frame: At post-operative day 30 ]Participants will rate their recovery as 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% or 100% according to standardised descriptors.
- Change in Functional Performance [ Time Frame: At diagnosis (Dx), baseline (T0), immediately post-intervention (T1) ]This will be measured using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). This measure combines the results of gait speed, chair stand and balance tests. A score lower than 10 indicates one or more mobility limitations.
- Change in Quality of Life [ Time Frame: At diagnosis (Dx), baseline (T0), immediately post-intervention (T1) and on post-operative day 30. ]
Quality of Life will be determined by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30).
Scores are reported on a linear scale from 0-100. A high score in a functional scale indicates greater function. A high score in a symptom scale indicates greater symptom burden.
- Change in Quality of Life (Specific to Lung Cancer) [ Time Frame: At diagnosis (Dx), baseline (T0), immediately post-intervention (T1) and on post-operative day 30. ]For Oesophago-gastric Cancer Patients Quality of Life will be further assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Oesophago-gastric Cancer Subscale the EORTC QLQ-LC 13. Scores are reported on a linear scale from 0-100. A high score in a functional scale indicates greater function. A high score in a symptom scale indicates greater symptom burden.
- Change in Quality of Life (Specific to Oesophageal Cancer) [ Time Frame: At diagnosis (Dx), baseline (T0), immediately post-intervention (T1) and on post-operative day 30. ]For Oesophago-gastric Cancer Patients Quality of Life will be further assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Oesophago-gastric Cancer Subscales the EORTC QLQ-OES18 and QLQ-OES25. Scores are reported on a linear scale from 0-100. A high score in a functional scale indicates greater function. A high score in a symptom scale indicates greater symptom burden.
- Cost Effectiveness [ Time Frame: At routine post-operative clinic visits at 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. ]The costs of the program will be set against the effects on HRQOL
- Qualitative Approach [ Time Frame: Immediately after the programme intervention (T1) ]Focus groups and interviews will be carried out with participants to gain their perspectives of the impact of the program on physical and mental well-being.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03978325
|Contact: Gráinne Sheill, PhDemail@example.com|
|University of Dublin, Trinity College||Not yet recruiting|
|Contact: Grainne Sheill|
|Principal Investigator: Juliette Hussey, PhD|
|Principal Investigator: Emer Guinan, PhD|
|Principal Investigator:||Juliette Hussey, PhD||University of Dublin, Trinity College|