We're building a better ClinicalTrials.gov. Check it out and tell us what you think!
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Cryoanalgesia to Prevent Acute and Chronic Pain Following Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Masked, Sham-Controlled Study

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03578237
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : July 6, 2018
Results First Posted : February 10, 2023
Last Update Posted : February 10, 2023
Sponsor:
Collaborators:
Epimed International
Myoscience (prior to merger with Pacira Pharmaceuticals)
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Brian M. Ilfeld, MD, MS, University of California, San Diego

Brief Summary:

The ultimate objective of the proposed line of research is to determine if cryoanalgesia is an effective adjunctive treatment for pain in the period immediately following various painful surgical procedures; and, if this analgesic modality decreases the risk of persistent postoperative pain, or "chronic" pain. The objective of the proposed pilot study is to optimize the protocol and collect data to power subsequent, definitive clinical trials.

Specific Aim 1: To determine if, compared with current and customary analgesia, the addition of cryoanalgesia decreases the incidence and severity of post-surgical pain.

Hypothesis 1a (primary): The severity of surgically-related pain will be significantly decreased on postoperative day 2 with the addition of cryoanalgesia as compared with patients receiving solely standard-of-care treatment.

Hypothesis 1b: The incidence of chronic pain will be significantly decreased one year following surgery with the addition of cryoanalgesia as compared with patients receiving solely standard-of-care treatment.

Hypothesis 1c: The severity of chronic pain will be significantly decreased one year following surgery with the addition of cryoanalgesia as compared with patients receiving solely standard-of-care treatment.

Specific Aim 2: To determine if, compared with current and customary analgesia, the addition of cryoanalgesia improves postoperative functioning.

Hypothesis 2a: Following primary unilateral knee and shoulder arthroplasty as well as rotator cuff repair, joint range of motion will be significantly increased within the year following surgery with the addition of cryoanalgesia as compared with patients receiving solely standard-of-care treatment.

Hypothesis 2b: Following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, inspiratory spirometry will be improved within the month following surgery with the addition of cryoanalgesia as compared with patients receiving solely standard-of-care treatment.


Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Mastectomy Upper Limb Amputation Below Elbow Upper Limb Amputation Above Elbow Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee Knee Arthropathy Shoulder Arthroplasty Rotator Cuff Repair Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) Skin Grafting Device: Cryoneurolysis (active) Device: Sham cryoneurolysis procedure Not Applicable

Show Show detailed description

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 99 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description: Only the investigator/physician applying the cryoneurolysis will be aware of the treatment group assignment.
Primary Purpose: Prevention
Official Title: Cryoanalgesia to Prevent Acute and Chronic Pain Following Surgery
Actual Study Start Date : August 25, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date : January 7, 2022
Actual Study Completion Date : November 25, 2022


Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Treatment (active cryoneurolysis)
Receiving active cryoneurolysis
Device: Cryoneurolysis (active)
Mastectomy (subjects 1-18): Myoscience Iovera device: full cryo cycle. Mastectomy (subjects 19-end) and all other procedures: Epimed PainBlocker device: 3 cycles of 2-minute gas activation separated by 1-minute defrost periods with an active probe which results in a decrease in temperature

Sham Comparator: Sham
Receiving sham cryoneurolysis procedure
Device: Sham cryoneurolysis procedure

Mastectomy (subjects 1-18): Myoscience Iovera device: simulated full cryo cycle without administering gas to the probe.

Mastectomy (subjects 19-end) and all other procedures: 3 cycles of 2-minute gas activation separated by 1-minute defrost periods with a SHAM probe that does not deliver gas to the tip or result in a drop in temperature

Other Name: Placebo treatment




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Average Pain (Mastectomy Subjects Only) [ Time Frame: afternoon of postoperative day 2 ]
    Measured with the 0-10 numeric rating scale as part of the Brief Pain Inventory, with 0 equivalent to no pain and 10 equivalent to the worst imaginable pain


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Analgesic Consumption [ Time Frame: Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14, 21, as well as months 1, 3, 6, and 12 ]
    Analgesic consumption for previous 24 hours

  2. Brief Pain Inventory (Interference Subscale) [ Time Frame: Months 1, 3, 6, and 12 ]
    The Brief Pain Inventory short form (interference scale) is designed to assess pain's impact on physical and emotional functioning. It has established reliability and validity, with minimal inter-rater discordance, and is recommended by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) consensus statement. The interference domaine is comprised of 7 questions involving the degree of pain's interference on physical and emotional functioning using a 0-10 Likert scale (0 = none; 10 = complete). The scale is thus 0-70 with higher scores equivalent to more interference due to pain>

  3. Worst Pain Measured on the 11 Point Numeric Rating Scale [ Time Frame: Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14, and 21 ]
    The subjects' perception of their worst level pain in the previous 24 hours measured with the 0-10 numeric rating scale as part of the Brief Pain Inventory, with 0 equivalent to no pain and 10 equivalent to the worst imaginable pain

  4. Average Pain Measured on the 11 Point Numeric Rating Scale [ Time Frame: Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14, and 21 ]
    The subjects' perception of their average level pain in the previous 24 hours measured with the 0-10 numeric rating scale as part of the Brief Pain Inventory, with 0 equivalent to no pain and 10 equivalent to the worst imaginable pain

  5. Difficultly Sleeping Due to Pain [ Time Frame: Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14, and 21 ]
    Difficulty sleeping due to pain (binary answer: yes or no; not based on a scale or instrument). The numbers presented in the results are the number of participants in each treatment group answering YES, they DID have difficulty sleeping due to pain

  6. Number of Awakenings [ Time Frame: Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14, and 21 ]
    Number of awakenings from sleep due to pain (simply the number of times of awakenings--not based on a scale or instrument)

  7. Nausea [ Time Frame: Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14, and 21 ]
    Nausea measured on a 0-10 scale with 0=no nausea and 10=vomiting; thus higher on the scale is worse

  8. Phantom Pain Occurences [Mastectomy & Amputation] [ Time Frame: Postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12 ]
    How many times in the previous 3 days subject experienced phantom pain (the number of times experienced--not based on a scale or instrument)

  9. Phantom Pain Duration [Mastectomy & Amputation] [ Time Frame: Postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12 ]
    The average duration of phantom pain occurrences in the previous 3 days

  10. Phantom Sensation Occurrences [Mastectomy & Amputation] [ Time Frame: Postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12 ]
    How many times in the previous 3 days subject experienced phantom sensations (the number of times experienced--not based on a scale or instrument). This outcome differs from "phantom pain occurrences" in that for this outcome no pain is necessary; rather, participants feel the missing body part is actually there, when it is not--yet it is not a painful sensation.

  11. Phantom Sensation Duration [Mastectomy & Amputation] [ Time Frame: Postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12 ]
    The average duration of phantom sensation occurrences in the previous 3 days. This outcome differs from "phantom pain duration" in that for this outcome no pain is necessary; rather, participants feel the missing body part is actually there, when it is not--yet it is not a painful sensation.

  12. Residual Limb or Wound Pain Occurences [ Time Frame: Postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12 ]
    How many times in the previous 3 days subject experienced residual limb or wound pain (the number of times experienced--not based on a scale or instrument)

  13. Residual Limb or Wound Pain Duration [ Time Frame: Postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12 ]
    The average duration of residual limb or wound pain occurrences in the previous 3 days



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. adult patients of at least 18 years of age
  2. scheduled for a primary, unilateral total knee or shoulder arthroplasty, primary unilateral rotator cuff repair, VATS procedure, skin grafting of the lateral thigh, unilateral or bilateral mastectomy, or limb amputation distal to the femoral/humeral head and including at least one metatarsal/metacarpal bone
  3. single-injection or continuous peripheral nerve blocks block or epidural infusion planned for perioperative analgesia
  4. accepting of a cryoneurolysis procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. chronic opioid use (daily use within the 2 weeks prior to surgery and duration of use > 4 weeks)
  2. pregnancy
  3. incarceration
  4. inability to communicate with the investigators
  5. morbid obesity (body mass index > 40 kg/m2)
  6. possessing any contraindication specific to cryoneurolysis such as a localized infection at the treatment site, cryoglobulinemia, cold urticaria and Reynaud's Syndrome

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT03578237


Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, California
UCSD Medical Center
San Diego, California, United States, 92103
Sponsors and Collaborators
University of California, San Diego
Epimed International
Myoscience (prior to merger with Pacira Pharmaceuticals)
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Brian Ilfeld, MD, MS University California San Diego
Study Director: John Finneran, MD University California San Diego
Study Director: Matthew Swisher, MD, MS University California San Diego
  Study Documents (Full-Text)

Documents provided by Brian M. Ilfeld, MD, MS, University of California, San Diego:
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Brian M. Ilfeld, MD, MS, Professor of Anesthesiology, In Residence, University of California, San Diego
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03578237    
Other Study ID Numbers: Cryo Prevention PILOTs
First Posted: July 6, 2018    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: February 10, 2023
Last Update Posted: February 10, 2023
Last Verified: January 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: Yes
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Chronic Pain
Pain
Neurologic Manifestations