Personalised HTO Versus Generic HTO Virtual Clinical Trial

High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) is an alternative to knee replacement in suitable patients with early knee osteoarthritis (OA), it is particularly suited to patients with single compart disease who otherwise would be suitable for unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). OA of the knee is very common and increasing driven by the ageing of the population. The current limitations of HTO are related to the difficulty of achieving the desired correction due to a challenging surgical technique and soft tissue irritation due to the use of generic stabilisation plates. This study will examine the safety equivalence of a new patient specific HTO process which has patient specific 3D printed plates, i.e. personalised HTO plates, with the existing most commonly used HTO procedure using the Tomofix generic HTO plate. Importantly this study will be undertaken as a Virtual Trial, existing anonymised 3D imaging data will be used to create the virtual patient cohort. This cohort will receive both procedures, which for this type of procedure is only possible in a virtual scenario.

The main question to be addressed is: "Is the personalised HTO procedure as safe as the most commonly used existing generic HTO procedure?". In this context safety concerns the mechanical loads placed upon the tibia and the support plate.

The interventions will all be made on computer models, the 3D imaging data will be used to create the intact (un-operated) models of the subject tibias. Each model will then be virtually operated upon, with both the personalised and generic HTO procedures. The models will then be loaded with physiological loads experienced during function and the mechanical states compared.