DEB-TACE for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (QED)
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02748161 |
Recruitment Status :
Terminated
(Low enrollment)
First Posted : April 22, 2016
Last Update Posted : June 21, 2018
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Patients enrolled in this study have been diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and are scheduled to have a procedure called drug-eluting bead trans-arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE). During the DEB-TACE procedure, very small beads are mixed in with a chemotherapy drug, doxorubicin, and delivered to the tumor through an arterial catheter.
The DEB-TACE procedure allows the treatment to be delivered directly into the liver. It also causes arterial embolization, the process in which a blood vessel is blocked. Treatment of HCC using DEB-TACE may help delay tumor progression and can downstage (decrease the size) the cancer in order to meet the criteria which may allow patients to become candidates for liver transplantation. The purpose of this study is to compare tumor response and medical outcomes for patients who undergo DEB-TACE with standard endhole catheter versus Surefire® Infusion System.
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Hepatocellular Carcinoma | Procedure: DEB-TACE | Not Applicable |
Conventional transarterial chemoembolization with lipiodol/doxorubicin (cTACE) is known to prolong survival compared to supportive therapy in certain patients with unresectable HCC, including patients with unilateral portal vein invasion (PVI). TACE with doxorubicin-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) is a relatively new modality associated with favorable systemic doxorubicin exposure/toxicity and liver-specific toxicity compared to cTACE and studies have documented its safety and efficacy. DEB-TACE is currently utilized for: (1) patients who have unresectable HCC; and (2) patients who meet the Milan Criteria and currently on liver transplantation lists.
The biggest challenge for these procedures has been the inability to actually quantify embolization in a real-time setting to provide immediate feedback to the operator. Although various methods, such as perfusion analysis with CT or MRI, have been described, these require advanced imaging equipment/capabilities, extensive post processing analysis, and can create challenging workflows.
Currently the best results occur when the dose is delivered in a highly targeted manner into the tumor. Dense accumulation of embolic spheres or lipiodol into the tumor as documented by CT has been shown to have improved outcomes. However, with standard endhole catheters achieving maximum delivery of embolic agents is limited by the development of stasis and subsequent non-target injury.
As DEB-TACE is performed through an endhole catheter with either stasis or substasis as an endpoint. The current methodology is extremely subjective, lacks a quantifiable endpoint, and results in various degrees of embolization on patients. Often this can result in repeat procedures or the progression of tumor.
Recently, there has been FDA clearance of a new anti-reflux catheter, Surefire® Infusion System (SIS, Westminster, CO). The current design has an expandable tip which collapses during forward flow, and then dynamically seal off the vessel with reversal of flow, analogous to a valve. SIS, with its expandable tip microcatheter, has been demonstrated clinically to cause a slight decrease in intra-arterial pressure in the antegrade, or downstream, vascular compartment. Although this device was designed primarily to prevent retrograde reflux of embolic agents, the downstream blood pressure reduction may serve as a biomarker on quantifying embolization.
The goal is to develop a method that: (1) allows maximum delivery of embolic spheres into the tumor tissue to stasis without reflux; (2) enables direct real time numerical quantification on the degree of embolization; and (3) provides an intra-procedural functional parameter which could be used to guide the optimal therapeutic endpoints at the time of treatment.
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Estimated Enrollment : | 170 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | None (Open Label) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | Surefire vs. Endhole for DEB-TACE: Quantifying Hepatic Artery Embolization to Improve Outcomes by Comparing Two Different Catheter Systems for DEB-TACE (QED Study) |
Study Start Date : | August 2015 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | May 15, 2018 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | June 15, 2018 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: DEB-TACE: Standard Endhole Catheter
Subjects will undergo DEB-TACE using a standard endhole catheter.
|
Procedure: DEB-TACE
Transarterial chemoembolization with doxorubicin-eluting beads. |
Active Comparator: DEB-TACE: Surefire Infusion System
Subjects will undergo DEB-TACE using the Surefire Infusion System.
|
Procedure: DEB-TACE
Transarterial chemoembolization with doxorubicin-eluting beads. |
- Objective tumor response [ Time Frame: 1 month following initial DEB-TACE procedure ]
- Objective tumor response [ Time Frame: 3 months following initial DEB-TACE procedure (or 1 month following retreatment if DEB-TACE retreatment performed) ]
- Dose of doxorubicin-eluting beads used during DEB-TACE procedure(s) [ Time Frame: Procedure ]
- Number of repeat DEB-TACE procedures per lesion [ Time Frame: 3 months following initial DEB-TACE procedure ]

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged 18 years or older, inclusive
- Diagnosis of HCC
- Meets UCSF criteria: a single lesion less than or equal to 6.5 cm in diameter or 2-3 lesions less than or equal to 4.5 cm with total tumor diameter less than or equal to 8 cm.
- No portal invasion or extrahepatic spread on imaging.
- Child-Pugh Class A or B.
- No previous chemotherapy, radiotherapy or transarterial embolization (with or without chemotherapy).
- An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
- A discrete hepatic artery feeding the tumor with diameter of the vessels equal to or greater than 1.5 mm.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Bilirubin levels greater than 3 mg/dl
- AST or ALT greater than 5 times upper limit of normal or greater than 250 U/l.
- Advanced tumoral disease (vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread, portal vein thrombosis of bland or malignant origin), or diffuse HCC, defined as 50% liver involvement).
- Contraindications for doxorubicin administration.
- Subject has a known history contraindicating contrast dye or iodine that cannot be safely controlled via antihistamine, steroids, or with any other agent.
- Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent.
- Vessels providing flow to the tumor that are less than 1.5 mm in diameter.
- Women who are pregnant or breast feeding.
- Women of childbearing potential who are not using an acceptable method of birth control (e.g., pill, patch, IUD, ring, condom, sponge, foam).
- Portal vein thrombosis of bland or malignant origin.

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02748161
United States, Alabama | |
University of Alabama at Birmingham | |
Birmingham, Alabama, United States | |
United States, Arizona | |
University of Arizona | |
Phoenix, Arizona, United States | |
United States, California | |
UCLA | |
Los Angeles, California, United States | |
USC | |
Los Angeles, California, United States | |
United States, Colorado | |
Radiology Imaging Associates | |
Denver, Colorado, United States | |
United States, District of Columbia | |
Georgetown University | |
Washington, District of Columbia, United States | |
United States, Maryland | |
University of Maryland | |
Baltimore, Maryland, United States | |
United States, New York | |
New York University | |
New York, New York, United States | |
United States, Ohio | |
Cleveland Clinical Foundation | |
Cleveland, Ohio, United States | |
University Hospitals of Cleveland | |
Cleveland, Ohio, United States | |
United States, Utah | |
University of Utah | |
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States |
Responsible Party: | Surefire Medical, Inc. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT02748161 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
HP-00061366 |
First Posted: | April 22, 2016 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | June 21, 2018 |
Last Verified: | June 2018 |
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
Plan to Share IPD: | No |
Hepatocellular carcinoma DEB-TACE QED |
Carcinoma Carcinoma, Hepatocellular Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial Neoplasms by Histologic Type Neoplasms Adenocarcinoma |
Liver Neoplasms Digestive System Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Digestive System Diseases Liver Diseases |