Comparative Study of Two Embryo Culture Systems (INCUBATE)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02722252|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified March 2016 by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon.
Recruitment status was: Recruiting
First Posted : March 29, 2016
Last Update Posted : June 13, 2016
The centre for Medically-Assisted Procreation (MAP) of Dijon CHU has two high-technology embryo culture systems, with incubation characteristics that are potentially superior to those provided by classical culture systems. Indeed, these two systems, available in only two MAP centres in France, make it possible to maintain a stable temperature and gaseous environment during the in-vitro development of the embryos.
It is necessary to observe the development of the embryos to determine which embryos have the highest implantation potential. These observations are done from time to time by microscope for one system and continuously using an incorporated video camera for the other (cinematographic study). The MAP centre in Dijon wishes to compare the interest of these two systems.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment|
|Infertility||Device: Embryoscope Device: Embryo culture system without incorporated camera|
|Study Type :||Observational|
|Estimated Enrollment :||266 participants|
|Official Title:||Comparative Study of Two Embryo Culture Systems: Randomization of Attempts at In Vitro Fertilization With ICSI at the Centre for Medically Assisted Procreation at Dijon CHU|
|Study Start Date :||April 2016|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||December 2016|
|Embryo culture without incorporated camera group||
Device: Embryo culture system without incorporated camera
- Implantation rate [ Time Frame: 16 weeks after transfer ]The implantation rate is defined as the number of embryos implanted (gestational sacs seen on the US scan) compared to the total number of embryos transferred.
- Rate of miscarriages [ Time Frame: 16 weeks after transfer ]
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02722252
|Contact: Patricia FAUQUE||03 80 29 51 01 ext +email@example.com|
|CHU de DIJON||Recruiting|
|Dijon, France, 21079|
|Contact: Patricia FAUQUE 03 80 29 51 01 ext +33 firstname.lastname@example.org|