Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

A Study Of Avelumab In Patients With Locally Advanced Or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (JAVELIN Bladder 100)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02603432
Recruitment Status : Active, not recruiting
First Posted : November 11, 2015
Results First Posted : December 17, 2020
Last Update Posted : November 23, 2021
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Pfizer

Brief Summary:
The main purpose of this study is to compare maintenance treatment with avelumab plus best supportive care (BSC) with BSC alone, to determine if avelumab has an effect on survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer that did not worsen during or following completion of first-line chemotherapy.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Urothelial Cancer Biological: Avelumab Other: Best Supportive Care Biological: Following the planned interim analysis for this study: Avelumab Phase 3

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 700 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A PHASE 3, MULTICENTER, MULTINATIONAL, RANDOMIZED, OPEN-LABEL, PARALLEL-ARM STUDY OF AVELUMAB (MSB0010718C) PLUS BEST SUPPORTIVE CARE VERSUS BEST SUPPORTIVE CARE ALONE AS A MAINTENANCE TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH LOCALLY ADVANCED OR METASTATIC UROTHELIAL CANCER WHOSE DISEASE DID NOT PROGRESS AFTER COMPLETION OF FIRST-LINE PLATINUM-CONTAINING CHEMOTHERAPY
Actual Study Start Date : April 25, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date : October 21, 2019
Estimated Study Completion Date : June 3, 2022

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

Drug Information available for: Avelumab

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Arm A
Avelumab plus Best Supportive Care (BSC)
Biological: Avelumab
1 hour intravenous infusion every 2 weeks (Q2W) in 4 week cycles

Other: Best Supportive Care
BSC will be administered as deemed appropriate by the treating physician, and could include treatment with antibiotics, nutritional support, correction of metabolic disorders, optimal symptom control and pain management (including palliative radiotherapy), etc. BSC does not include any active anti-tumor therapy, however local radiotherapy of isolated lesions with palliative intent is acceptable.

Arm B

Best Supportive Care (BSC) alone

Following the planned interim analysis for this study, eligible patients in Arm B whose cancer has not worsened and are still in the "watch and wait" part of the study will be given the option to receive Avelumab plus BSC. Prior to this, Arm B patients received BSC alone. All patients who choose not to receive Avelumab will be discontinued.

Other: Best Supportive Care
BSC will be administered as deemed appropriate by the treating physician, and could include treatment with antibiotics, nutritional support, correction of metabolic disorders, optimal symptom control and pain management (including palliative radiotherapy), etc. BSC does not include any active anti-tumor therapy, however local radiotherapy of isolated lesions with palliative intent is acceptable.

Biological: Following the planned interim analysis for this study: Avelumab
1 hour intravenous infusion every 2 weeks (Q2W) in 4 week cycles




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Overall Survival (OS) [ Time Frame: From randomization to discontinuation from the study, death or date of censoring, whichever occurred first (maximum duration of up to 41 months at the time of final analysis) ]
    Overall survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants last known to be alive were censored at date of last contact. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) [ Time Frame: From randomization to date of progression of disease, discontinuation from the study, death or date of censoring, whichever occurred first (maximum duration of up to 41 months at the time of the analysis) ]
    BICR assessed PFS: Duration from randomization until disease progression (PD) or death. PD as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 was defined for target disease as at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study (this included baseline sum if that was smallest on study). In addition to relative increase of 20%, sum must have also demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. For non-target disease: PD was defined as unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions and if overall tumor burden increased sufficiently to merit discontinuation of therapy. Appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesion was also considered PD. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier. PFS data was censored on date of last adequate tumor assessment for participants with no event (PD or death), who started new anti-cancer therapy prior to an event or with an event after 2 or more missing tumor assessments.

  2. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Investigator [ Time Frame: From randomization to date of progression of disease, discontinuation from the study, death or date of censoring, whichever occurred first (maximum duration of up to 41 months at the time of the analysis) ]
    Investigator assessed PFS: Duration from randomization to first documentation of PD or death, whichever occurred first. PD as per RECIST version 1.1 was defined for target disease as at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study (this included baseline sum if that was smallest on study). In addition to relative increase of 20%, sum must have also demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. For non-target disease: PD was defined as unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions and if overall tumor burden increased sufficiently to merit discontinuation of therapy. Appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesion was also considered PD. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier. PFS data was censored on date of last adequate tumor assessment for participants with no event (PD or death), who started a new anti-cancer therapy prior to an event or with an event after 2 or more missing tumor assessments.

  3. Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) [ Time Frame: From randomization to progression of disease, start of new anti-cancer therapy or discontinuation from study or death, whichever occurred first (maximum duration of up to 41 months at the time of the analysis) ]
    BICR assessed objective response according to RECIST version 1.1, was defined as participants with confirmed best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, with the exception of nodal disease and sustained for at least 4 weeks. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (<) 10 mm. PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.

  4. Percentage of Participants With Objective Response as Assessed by Investigator [ Time Frame: From randomization to progression of disease, start of new anti-cancer therapy or discontinuation from study or death, whichever occurred first (maximum duration of up to 41 months at the time of the analysis) ]
    Investigator assessed objective response according to RECIST version 1.1, was defined as participants with confirmed best overall response of CR or PR. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, with the exception of nodal disease and sustained for at least 4 weeks. A CR also required normalization of tumor marker levels and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.

  5. Time to Tumor Response (TTR) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) [ Time Frame: From the date of randomization to the first documentation of objective response (CR or PR) (maximum duration of up to 41 months at the time of the analysis) ]
    TTR was defined, for participants with an objective response as the time from 'start date' to the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR), which was confirmed subsequently. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, with the exception of nodal disease and sustained for at least 4 weeks. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.

  6. Time to Tumor Response (TTR) as Assessed by Investigator [ Time Frame: From the date of randomization to the first documentation of objective response (CR or PR) (maximum duration of up to 41 months at the time of the analysis) ]
    TTR was defined, for participants with an objective response as the time from 'start date' to the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR). CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, with the exception of nodal disease and sustained for at least 4 weeks. A CR also required normalization of tumor marker levels and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.

  7. Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) [ Time Frame: First response subsequently confirmed to progression of disease or start of new anti-cancer therapy or discontinuation from the study or death, whichever occurred first (maximum duration of up to 41 months at the time of the analysis) ]
    BICR assessed DOR: time from first documentation of OR (confirmed CR or PR) to date of first documentation of PD or death due to any cause. As per RECIST version 1.1, CR: complete disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, with exception of nodal disease sustained for 4 weeks. Any pathological lymph nodes reduced in short axis to <10 mm. PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum longest dimensions. PD for target disease: at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study and relative increase of 20%, sum also demonstrated absolute increase of at least 5 mm. PD for non-target disease: unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions and if overall tumor burden increased sufficiently to merit discontinuation of therapy. Appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesion was also considered PD.

  8. Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by Investigator [ Time Frame: First response subsequently confirmed to progression of disease or start of new anti-cancer therapy or discontinuation from the study or death, whichever occurred first (maximum duration of up to 41 months at the time of the analysis) ]
    Investigator assessed DOR: time from first documentation of OR (confirmed CR or PR) to date of first documentation of PD or death due to any cause. As per RECIST version 1.1, CR: complete disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, with exception of nodal disease sustained for 4 weeks. Additionally, normalization of tumor marker levels and any pathological lymph nodes reduced in short axis to <10 mm. PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum longest dimensions. PD for target disease: at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study and relative increase of 20%, sum also demonstrated absolute increase of at least 5 mm. PD for non-target disease: unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions and if overall tumor burden increased sufficiently to merit discontinuation of therapy. Appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesion was also considered PD.

  9. Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) [ Time Frame: From randomization to PD, death or start of new anti-cancer therapy (maximum duration of up to 41 months at the time of the analysis) ]
    Disease Control (DC) was defined as a best overall response of CR, PR, non-CR/non-PD or stable disease (SD) as assessed by BICR. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, with the exception of nodal disease and sustained for at least 4 weeks. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. Non-CR/Non-PD was defined as persistence of any non-target lesions and/or tumor marker level above the normal limits. SD was defined as not to qualify for CR, PR or PD for target lesions and followed PR only if the sum increased by less than 20% from the nadir, but enough that a previously documented 30% decrease no longer holds.

  10. Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) as Assessed by Investigator [ Time Frame: From randomization to PD, death or start of new anti-cancer therapy (maximum duration of up to 41 months at the time of the analysis) ]
    DC was defined as a best overall response of CR, PR, non-CR/non-PD or SD as assessed by Investigator. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, with the exception of nodal disease and sustained for at least 4 weeks. Additionally, normalization of tumor marker levels and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. Non-CR/Non-PD was defined as persistence of any non-target lesions and/or tumor marker level above the normal limits. SD was defined as not to qualify for CR, PR or PD for target lesions and followed PR only if the sum increased by less than 20% from the nadir, but enough that a previously documented 30% decrease no longer holds.

  11. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Graded Based on, National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 [ Time Frame: For "Avelumab + Best Supportive Care (BSC)'' group: Day 1 up to 90 days after last dose of study drug; for "Best Supportive Care'' group: Day 1 up to 90 days after EOT visit, for a maximum duration of up to 41 months at the time of the analysis ]
    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. As per NCI-CTCAE version 4.03, Grade 1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE. Treatment-emergent AEs are events between first dose of study drug and up to 90 days after last dose of study drug or end of treatment (EOT) visit, that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

  12. Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3 (G3), Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 [ Time Frame: For "Avelumab + Best Supportive Care (BSC)'' group: Day 1 up to 90 days after last dose of study drug; for "Best Supportive Care'' group: Day 1 up to 90 days after EOT visit, for a maximum duration of up to 41 months at the time of the analysis ]
    Hematology (Anemia G3: hemoglobin<8.0 grams per deciliter [g/dL],<4.9 mmol/L,<80 g/L, transfusion indicated, Grade 4 [G4]: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated, Grade 5 [G5]: death; platelet count decreased-G3:<50.0 to 25.0*10^9/L, G4: <25.0*10^9/L; lymphocyte count decreased-G3:<0.5-0.2*10^9/L, G4:<0.2*10^9/L; neutrophil count decreased-G3:<1.0 to 0.5*10^9 /L, G4:<0.5*10^9/L). Chemistry (creatinine increased-G3:>3.0 to 6.0*upper limit of normal [ULN], G4:>6.0*ULN; serum amylase increased, lipase increased-G3:>2.0- 5.0*ULN, G4:>5.0*ULN. Aspartate aminotransferase [AST], alanine aminotransferase [ALT]-G3:>5.0 to 20.0*ULN, G4:>20.0*ULN]. Blood bilirubin increased-[G3:>3.0 to 10.0*ULN, G4:>10.0*ULN], Creatine phosphokinase [CPK] increased- [G3:>5.0 to 10.0*ULN, G4:>10.0*ULN], Hyperglycemia-[G3:>250 to 500 mg/dL; >13.9 to 27.8 mmol/L hospitalization indicated, G4:>500 mg/DL; >27.8 mmol/L life-threatening consequences]).

  13. Change From Baseline in Vital Signs - Blood Pressure at Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and End of Treatment (EOT) Visit [ Time Frame: Baseline (D1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, EOT visit (maximum duration of up to 41 months at the time of the analysis) ]
    Vital signs included blood pressure and pulse rate. Blood pressure included sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP).

  14. Change From Baseline in Vital Signs - Pulse Rate at Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and End of Treatment (EOT) Visit [ Time Frame: Baseline (D1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, EOT visit (maximum duration of up to 41 months at the time of the analysis) ]
    Vital signs included blood pressure and pulse rate. Changes from baseline in sitting pulse rate were summarized.

  15. Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Avelumab [ Time Frame: End of avelumab infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 and Day 15 of Cycle 1, 2, 3 ]
    The LLQ of avelumab was 0.20 mcg/mL. Data for this outcome measure was not collected for reporting group "Best Supportive Care", since avelumab was not administered in this arm.

  16. Predose Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Avelumab [ Time Frame: Pre-dose (0 hour) on Day 1 of Cycle 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 and Day 15 of Cycle 1, 2, 3 ]
    The LLQ of avelumab was 0.20 mcg/mL. Data for this outcome measure was not collected for reporting group "Best Supportive Care", since avelumab was not administered in this arm.

  17. Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status [ Time Frame: From randomization up to the 30-Day Follow-up visit (maximum duration of up to 41 months at the time of the analysis) ]
    ADA against avelumab in serum samples was determined and reported separately for ADA never positive and ADA ever positive participants. Participants were considered ADA ever-positive if they had at least one positive ADA result at any time point during study and were otherwise considered negative. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for reporting arm "Best Supportive Care", since, avelumab was not administered in this arm.

  18. Number of ADA Ever Positive Participants For Each Serum of ADA Titers for Avelumab [ Time Frame: From randomization up to the 30-Day Follow-up visit (maximum duration of up to 41 months at the time of the analysis) ]
    Serum samples were assayed for ADA using a validated analytical method. Number of ADA ever positive participants for each serum of ADA titer (60, 180, 540, 1620, 4860, 14580, and 43740) are reported.

  19. Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) Against Avelumab by Never Positive and Ever Positive Status [ Time Frame: Up to approximately 60 months ]
  20. Number of Participants With Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) [ Time Frame: Up to 41 months at the time of the analysis ]
    PD-L1 assessment was performed using immunohistochemistry on pre-treatment tumor tissue samples. Participants were classified as having PD-L1 -positive status if at least one of the following three criteria were met: at least 25% of tumor cells stained for PD-L1, at least 25% of immune cells stained for PD-L1 if more than 1% of the tumor area contained immune cells, or 100% of immune cells stained for PD-L1 if no more than 1% of the tumor area contained immune cells.

  21. Number of Participants With Cluster of Differentiation 8 (CD8) T Lymphocytes (Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes) [ Time Frame: Up to approximately 60 months ]
  22. Change From Baseline in National Comprehensive Cancer Network- Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (NCCN-FACT) Bladder Symptom Index- 18 (FBlSI-18) Score at Day 1 of Cycle 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 6 ]
    NCCN-FACT FBlSI-18 is an 18-item participant completed questionnaire, designed to assess impact of cancer therapy on urothelial cancer-related symptoms and quality of life based on numerical point scoring of symptoms/concerns. It included four subscales: Disease related symptoms- physical subscale with 9 items, disease related symptoms- emotional subscale with 2 items, treatment side effects subscale with 5 items and general function/well-being subscale with 2 items. Participants rated their level of symptoms for each item using 5-point scale ranging from 0=not at all to 4=very much. Items that were negatively framed, and the scores were reversed for analysis so that higher scores= good quality of life. Overall score: total of 18 items, ranging from 0=severely symptomatic to 72=asymptomatic. Higher scores= better functioning or lower symptom burden.

  23. Time to Deterioration (TTD) Based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network- Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (NCCN-FACT) Bladder Symptom Index- 18 (FBlSI-18) Disease Related Symptoms-Physical Subscale (DRS-P) Scores [ Time Frame: From randomization up to the 90-Day Follow-up Visit (maximum duration of up to 41 months at the time of the analysis) ]
    NCCN-FACT FBlSI-18: an 18-item participant completed questionnaire, designed to assess impact of cancer therapy on urothelial cancer-related symptoms and quality of life based on numerical point scoring of symptoms/concerns. It included four subscales: Disease related symptoms-physical subscale with 9 items,disease related symptoms-emotional subscale with 2 items, treatment side effects subscale with 5 items,general function/well-being subscale with 2 items. Participants rated their level of symptoms for each item using 5-point scale ranging: 0=not at all to 4=very much. For items negatively framed, scores were reversed for analysis so that higher scores= good quality of life. DRS-P score: total 9 items, ranging from 0=severely symptomatic to 36= asymptomatic. Higher scores=better functioning or lower symptom burden. TTD: time from randomization to first time participant's score showed 3 point or greater decrease from baseline in FBlSI-DRS-P subscale for 2 consecutive assessments.

  24. Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Overall Health Utility Score at Cycle 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 6 ]
    The EQ-5D-5L was a 6-item participant-completed questionnaire designed to assess health status in terms of a single utility score. There were 2 components to the EQ-5D-5L, a Health State Profile which had individuals rate their level of problems (none, slight, moderate, severe, extreme/unable) in 5 areas (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in which participant rated their overall health status from 0 (worst imaginable) to 100 (best imaginable). Published UK weights was used to create a single summary utility score. Utility scores range from -0.594 to 1, with low scores representing lower health status.

  25. Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Cycle 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 6 ]
    The EQ-5D-5L was a 6-item participant-completed questionnaire designed to assess health status in terms of a single utility score. There were 2 components to the EQ-5D-5L, a Health State Profile which had individuals rate their level of problems (none, slight, moderate, severe, extreme/unable) in 5 areas (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in which participant rated their overall health status from 0 (worst imaginable) to 100 (best imaginable), higher scores indicating a better health state.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium
  • Stage IV disease at the start of first-line chemotherapy
  • Measurable disease (per RECIST v1.1) prior to the start of first-line chemotherapy
  • Prior first-line chemotherapy must have consisted of at least 4 cycles and no more than 6 cycles of gemcitabine + cisplatin and/or gemcitabine + carboplatin
  • No evidence of progressive disease following completion of first-line chemotherapy (i.e., ongoing CR, PR, or SD per RECIST v1.1 guidelines )

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant systemic therapy within 12 months of randomization
  • Prior immunotherapy with IL-2, IFN-α, or an anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-PD-L2, anti-CD137, or CTLA 4 antibody (including ipilimumab), or any other antibody or drug specifically targeting T-cell co-stimulation or immune checkpoint pathways
  • Persisting toxicity related to prior therapy (Grade >1 NCI CTCAE v4.0); however, alopecia, sensory neuropathy (Grade 2 or less), or other (Grade 2 or less) adverse events not constituting a safety risk based on the investigator's judgement are acceptable.
  • Patients with known symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) metastases requiring steroids
  • Diagnosis of any other malignancy within 5 years prior to randomization, except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, carcinoma in situ of the breast or of the cervix, low grade prostate cancer on surveillance without any plans for treatment intervention, or prostate cancer that has been adequately treated with prostatectomy or radiotherapy and currently with no evidence of disease or symptoms.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02603432


Locations
Show Show 369 study locations
Sponsors and Collaborators
Pfizer
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center Pfizer
  Study Documents (Full-Text)

Documents provided by Pfizer:
Study Protocol  [PDF] March 8, 2021
Statistical Analysis Plan  [PDF] April 2, 2019

Additional Information:
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Pfizer
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02603432    
Other Study ID Numbers: B9991001
2015-003262-86 ( EudraCT Number )
JAVELIN BLADDER 100 ( Other Identifier: Alias Study Number )
First Posted: November 11, 2015    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: December 17, 2020
Last Update Posted: November 23, 2021
Last Verified: November 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Yes
Plan Description: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
URL: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by Pfizer:
Bladder cancer
Urologic neoplasms
urothelial carcinoma
PD-L1
programmed cell death protein
maintenance treatment
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Avelumab
Antibodies, Monoclonal
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
Antineoplastic Agents
Immunologic Factors
Physiological Effects of Drugs