Intra- Versus Extraplexic Catheter Placement for Continuous Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02433561 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : May 5, 2015
Last Update Posted : November 9, 2016
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block consists of inserting a catheter directly within the brachial plexus in the interscalene groove, between the middle and anterior scalene muscles, which is then infused with local anesthetic. This technique provides potent and site-specific analgesia for several days after major shoulder surgery, along with increased shoulder range of motion. A major side-effect of this procedure is the paralysis of the ipsilateral diaphragm, which is the main muscle of the respiration. This paralysis occurs at a rate of 90 to 100%, and is due to the spread of the local anesthetic towards the phrenic nerve, lying anteriorly to the plexus, between the sternocleidomastoid and anterior scalene muscles. Therefore, many patients suffering from respiratory syndromes, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, will not have a continuous interscalene brachial plexus block, thus forfeiting some, or all, of the aforementioned benefits associated regional anesthesia.
It is conventionally taught to place the needle tip between the nerve roots of the brachial plexus to obtain an effective block (intra-plexic injection). Recently, we have published a new technique of single-shot injection for interscalene brachial plexus block where the needle tip was positioned at a distance of 4 mm of the lateral part of the brachial plexus (extra-plexic injection) and resulted in a reduction rate of 70% of hemidiaphragmatic paresis and a preservation of spirometric values, while providing similar analgesia, when compared to a conventional injection. Contrary to single-shot injections where high volume and high concentration of local anesthetics are injected (eg, ropivacaine 0.5%, 20 mLs), continuous blocks required low volume and low concentration (eg, ropivacaine 0.1-2%, 2-6 mLs/h) and therefore the aforementioned concept of extra-plexic technique might not be suitable.
Recently, new catheter-over-the needle (Contiplex® C; B. Braun Melsungen AG, Germany) have been released on the market and allows the physician to place the catheter tip exactly where he desires, contrary to the previous generations where the catheters were inserted blindly, despite the use of ultrasound.
The first objective of that randomised controlled trial is to demonstrate that an extra-plexus catheter placement produces less respiratory complications than an intra-plexus catheter placement. The second objective is to confirm that both techniques provide similar analgesia.
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Shoulder Pain Regional Anesthesia Morbidity Shoulder Arthritis | Procedure: Intraplexic catheter location (Contiplex® C, B. Braun Melsungen, AG) Procedure: Extraplexic catheter location (Contiplex® C, B. Braun Melsungen, AG) | Phase 4 |

Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 70 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | Intra- Versus Extraplexic Catheter Placement for Continuous Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block: Respiratory-related and Pain-related Outcomes |
Study Start Date : | November 2015 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | October 2016 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | October 2016 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Intraplexic catheter
Intraplexic approach (Patients will have the catheter placed within the plexus, classical approach)
|
Procedure: Intraplexic catheter location (Contiplex® C, B. Braun Melsungen, AG)
The catheter tip will be placed with the aid of the ultrasound within the brachial plexus between C5 and C6
Other Name: Contiplex® C, B. Braun Melsungen, AG |
Experimental: Extraplexic catheter
Extraplexic approach (Patients will have the catheter placed out of the plexus.)
|
Procedure: Extraplexic catheter location (Contiplex® C, B. Braun Melsungen, AG)
The catheter tip will be placed with the aid of the ultrasound 2 mm away from the lateral part of the brachial plexus
Other Name: Contiplex® C, B. Braun Melsungen, AG |
- Rate of hemidiaphragmatic paresis [ Time Frame: 24 postoperative hours ]
- Fentanyl consumption [ Time Frame: Intraoperative ]
- Morphine consumption [ Time Frame: 2 postoperative hours ]
- Oxycodone consumption [ Time Frame: postoperative day 1, 2 and 3 ]
- Pain scores at rest [ Time Frame: postoperative day 1, 2 and 3 ]
- Pain scores on movement [ Time Frame: postoperative day 1, 2 and 3 ]
- Forced expiratory volume at 1 sec (FEV1) [ Time Frame: postoperative day 0, 1, 2 and 3 ]
- Forced vital capacity [ Time Frame: postoperative day 0, 1, 2 and 3 ]
- Peak expiratory flow [ Time Frame: postoperative day 0, 1, 2 and 3 ]
- Rate of hemidiaphragmatic paresis [ Time Frame: postoperative day 0, 2 and 3 ]

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- ASA physical status I-III
- Major shoulder surgery: rotator cuff repair, shoulder arthroplasty
Exclusion Criteria:
- contraindications to brachial plexus block (e.g., allergy to local anesthetics, coagulopathy, malignancy or infection in the area);
- existing neurological deficit in the area to be blocked;
- history of neck surgery or radiotherapy;
- severe respiratory disease;
- chest deformity,
- pregnancy;
- inability to understand the informed consent and demands of the study;
- patient refusal.

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02433561
Switzerland | |
Eric Albrecht | |
Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland, 1004 |
Principal Investigator: | Eric Albrecht, MD | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois |
Responsible Party: | Eric Albrecht, PD Dr Eric Albrecht, MD, MER, DESA, Program Director, Regional Anaesthesia, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT02433561 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
CHUVaudois |
First Posted: | May 5, 2015 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | November 9, 2016 |
Last Verified: | November 2016 |
Shoulder Pain Joint Diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Arthralgia Pain Neurologic Manifestations |