Improved Prevention of Stroke in Primary Care in Stockholm, Sweden (Förbättrad Prevention av Stroke)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01942031|
Recruitment Status : Enrolling by invitation
First Posted : September 13, 2013
Last Update Posted : August 18, 2017
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Ischemic Stroke Hemorrhagic Stroke TIA Atrial Fibrillation||Behavioral: structured collegial feed back||Not Applicable|
All primary care centers in Stockholm County (approximately 200) are randomised to control or intervention (receiving structured feed back on detection rate of stroke/transient ischemic attacks in comparison to hospital discharge registry data. The randomisation is done group wise based on training areas. A data set is presented by different means; 1) in written reports, directly to the head of each primary care center in the intervention group 2)in oral presentation on training sessions for the physicians in each training ares. Measures of detection rates of diagnosis and dispensed prescriptions of secondary preventive drugs are made before start of the project and after one year. The control group, ie the primary care centers not receiving feed back, are measured in the same way and thus provide a control group. The hypothesis being that with visibility of the problem, it is easier to improve care wich is what all health providers aim to do.
Outcome measures is percentage of patients with stroke (ICD code I60, I 61, I63, I64) and transitory ischemic attacks(G45) who are dispensed prescribed secondary preventive medication and death.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||204 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||An Interventional Study of How Collegial Feed Back to Primary Care Physicians on Detection of Diagnosis and Dispensation of Prescribed Secondary Preventive Drugs Affect Stroke Prevention.|
|Study Start Date :||October 2013|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||December 2015|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||March 2018|
Experimental: structured collegial feed back
Structured feed back and information about stroke to the primary care center, to physicians and head of the center
Behavioral: structured collegial feed back
Collegial feed back to primary care physicians at randomized primary care centers
No Intervention: Control group
No structured feed back on stroke prevention. Ordinary educational activities only.
- percentage of identified patients with stroke/TIA in primary care and analysis of dispensed prescriptions in each group [ Time Frame: Outcome meassures will be followed during two years ]percentage of patients identified with hospital discharge diagnosis of stroke/TIA in primary care diagnosis register. Analysis of changes in outcome before intervention and after. the intervention will take place during one year and collection of data before start of intervention and one year after ended intervention will be performed
- dispensed prescriptions of secondary preventives drugs in patients with stroke/TIA [ Time Frame: baseline 2010 and 2012, followed for one year after intervention ]dispensed prescriptions of recommended secondary preventive drugs in patients detected and not detected at each primary care center
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01942031
|Karolinska Institutet Stroke Research Network at Södersjukhuset|
|Principal Investigator:||Mia von Euler, MD, PhD||Karolinska Institutet|