Efficacy Study of Dexamethasone to Treat the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (DEXA-ARDS)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01731795|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : November 22, 2012
Last Update Posted : February 26, 2018
BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no proven pharmacologic treatment for patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Great interest remains in the use of corticosteroids for the salvage of patients with severe acute lung injury in the early phase of their disease process, a situation that that has not been evaluated in most published trials. Dexamethasone has never been evaluated in ARDS in a randomized controlled fashion.
HYPOTHESIS AND OBJECTIVES: The investigators hypothesize that adjunctive treatment with intravenous dexamethasone of patients with established ARDS might change the pulmonary and systemic inflammatory response and thereby will increase the number of ventilator-free days and will decrease the extremely high overall mortality. Our goal is to examine the effects of dexamethasone on length of duration of mechanical ventilation (assessed by number of ventilator-free days) and on mortality, in patients admitted into a network of Spanish intensive care units (ICUs) who still meet ARDS criteria at 24 hours after ARDS onset.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome||Drug: Dexamethasone||Phase 4|
The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is an inflammatory disease process of the lungs as a response to both direct and indirect insults, characterized clinically by severe hypoxemia, reduced lung compliance, and bilateral radiographic infiltrates. ARDS is caused by an insult to the alveolar-capillary membrane that results in increased permeability and subsequent interstitial and alveolar edema. The mechanisms by which a wide variety of insults can lead to this syndrome are not clear. It is useful to think of the pathogenesis of ARDS as a result of two different pathways: a direct insult on lung cells and an indirect insult as a result of an acute systemic inflammatory response.
Like any form of inflammation, acute lung injury during ARDS represents a complex process in which multiple cellular signalling pathways can propagate or inhibit lung injury. Death has traditionally been attributed to the underlying disease, the presence of sepsis and the failure of vital organ systems other than the lung. The association of ARDS with multiple system organ dysfunctions is not inevitable, but it certainly is common. It is postulated that local injury to the lungs (pneumonia, trauma, aspiration, gas inhalation) could set up a secondary diffuse inflammatory response resulting in damage to other organs.
Although much has evolved in our understanding of its pathogenesis and factors affecting patient outcome, still there is no specific pharmacologic treatment for ARDS. Despite advances in supportive measures and antibiotics, ARDS has a mortality rate of about 40-50% in most series and it is associated with significant health care costs. Patients with ARDS invariably require endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation (MV) to decrease the work of breathing and to improve oxygen transport. To date the only proven, widely accepted method of MV for ARDS is what is called "lung protective ventilation" using a low tidal volume strategy plus positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP).
Corticoids seemed to be an ideal therapy for the acute lung injury in ARDS, given their potent anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic properties. They switch off genes that encode pro-inflammatory cytokines and switch on genes that encode anti-inflammatory cytokines. It has been reported that low doses of corticosteroids prevent an extended cytokine response and might accelerate the resolution of pulmonary and systemic inflammation in pneumonia.
Dexamethasone has never been evaluated in ARDS in a randomized controlled fashion. However, dexametasone has potent anti-inflammatory effects and weak mineralocorticoid effects compared with other corticosteroids. Dexamethasone has a long-lasting effect, allowing for a once-a-day regimen. Whether addition of dexamethasone to conventional supportive treatment benefits ARDS patients is unknown, it has been used in patients with sepsis, septic shock, pneumonia, trauma, and meningitis, all of them causes of ARDS.
The investigators justify the need of our study based on the positive results of two recent clinical trials: (i) Meijvis et al (Lancet 2011) showed that dexamethasone (5 mg/day) for 4 days was able to reduce length of hospital stay in 304 patients with bacterial pneumonia when added to the conventional treatment; (ii) Azoulay et al (Eur Respir J 2011) showed that dexamethasone (10 mg/6h), when added to chemotherapy and conventional ICU management, caused less respiratory deterioration and lower ICU mortality in 40 patients with acute lung injury resulting from leukaemia.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||314 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||A Comparative, Randomised Controlled Trial for Evaluating the Efficacy of Dexamethasone in the Treatment of Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome|
|Study Start Date :||April 2013|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||June 2018|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||June 2018|
No Intervention: No dexamethasone
Patients will be treated with conventional treatment
Active Comparator: Dexamethasone
Conventional treatment plus dexamethasone
Dexamethasone (20 mg/iv/daily/from Day 1 of randomization during 5 days, followed by 10 mg/iv/daily/ from Day 6 to 10 of randomization)
Other Name: Dexamethasone Indukern
- Ventilator free-days [ Time Frame: 28 days ]Number of ventilator free-days (VFDs) at Day 28 (defined as days alive and free from mechanical ventilation at day 28 after intubation. For subjects ventilated ≥28 days and for subjects who die, VFD is 0.
- Mortality [ Time Frame: 60 days ]All-cause mortality at Day 60 after enrolment.
- organ failure [ Time Frame: ICU discharge ]Number of extrapulmonary organ system failures
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01731795
|Hospital Universitario Dr. Negrin||Recruiting|
|Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, 35010|
|Contact: Jesús Villar, MD, PhD +34928449413 email@example.com|
|Contact: Rosa L Fernández, MSc +34928450082 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Principal Investigator: Jesús Villar, MD, PhD|
|Hospital Clinico de Valencia||Recruiting|
|Contact: Javier Belda, MD, PhD email@example.com|
|Contact: Carlos L Ferrando, MD, PhD firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Sub-Investigator: Javier Belda, MD, PhD|
|Principal Investigator:||Jesús Villar, MD, PhD||Research Unit, Hospital Universitario Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas, Spain|