A Randomized Controlled Trial of Open Surgical vs. Minimally-invasive Voluntary Adult Male Circumcision
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01688310|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : September 19, 2012
Results First Posted : September 10, 2013
Last Update Posted : September 10, 2013
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Surgical Technique||Procedure: Gomco Clamp with Tissue Adhesive Procedure: Open surgical circumcision||Not Applicable|
Voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) is a priority preventive intervention and Mozambique is a priority country for VMMC scale-up. PEPFAR recently estimated that one HIV infection would be prevented between now and 2025 for every seven circumcisions performed in Mozambique. Sofala Province, where the study will be conducted, has an HIV prevalence of 13% among men and 18% among women. Approximately 8% of men aged 15-49 in Sofala Province, where the study will take place, are currently circumcised.
In spite of their widely acknowledged drawbacks, open surgical techniques are the only VMMC techniques the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) program currently allows in Africa. According to the Framework for Clinical Evaluation of Devices for Adult Male Circumcision (WHO, 2011): "WHO and other health authorities wish to identify one or more devices that (a) would make the VMMC safer, easier, and quicker; (b) would have more rapid healing than current methods and/or might entail less risk of HIV transmission in the post-operative period; (c) could be performed safely by health-care providers with a minimal level of training; and (d) would be cost-effective compared to standard surgical methods for male circumcision scale up."
This proposed randomized controlled trial will provide important data which will inform and enable the Mozambican government and PEPFAR to more effectively scale-up circumcision services. The investigators postulate that VMMC using the Gomco clamp coupled with tissue adhesive meets WHO criteria for the ideal method: it is much easier to learn, faster, safer for both surgeons and patients, heals sooner, and is more cost effective than any other currently available technique.
The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing this minimally-invasive circumcision technique to the open surgical technique:
- Gomco clamp with tissue adhesive: 100 men
- Open surgical circumcision: 100 men
The Gomco clamp is an FDA-approved device widely used in the US, but there are few data on its use in Africa. Tissue adhesive is widely used in multiple areas of medicine; specifically, multiple observational studies and RCTs have shown cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives to be superior to suture closure in circumcision in boys. The investigators refer to Gomco clamp circumcision coupled with tissue adhesive as a 'new' technique because these two independently-validated components have only been coupled in observational studies among men, and in randomized controlled trials among pre-pubertal boys, but never before in an RCT among adult men. The open surgical method is PEPFAR-approved and will serve as the control intervention.
Population: Men > 18 years of age who desire male circumcision Sample size: 200 (100 men in each group) Study design: Randomized controlled trial Intervention: Gomco clamp circumcision plus tissue adhesive vs. open surgical circumcision Follow-up visits: 2 days, 7 days, 14 days and 28 days. Optional 42 day follow-up if not completely healed by 4 weeks.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||200 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||A Randomized Controlled Trial of Open Surgical vs. Minimally-invasive Voluntary Adult Male Circumcision|
|Study Start Date :||August 2012|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||March 2013|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||March 2013|
Active Comparator: Open surgical circumcision
Open surgical techniques, which are commonly used for circumcision in Mozambique, require good surgical skills and minor complications are common.
Procedure: Open surgical circumcision
The World Health Organization, in its Manual for Male Circumcision under Local Anaesthesia, describes three open surgical techniques (forceps assisted, dorsal slit and sleeve technique), all three of which involve (a) exposure of subcutaneous tissues and (b) suturing for hemostasis and for skin closure.
Experimental: Gomco clamp with tissue adhesive
Coupling removal of the foreskin with the Gomco clamp followed by wound sealing with tissue adhesive results in a procedure that can be performed by generalist doctors using the same technique in all age groups.
Procedure: Gomco Clamp with Tissue Adhesive
According to WHO (2011), the Gomco clamp has "…an impeccable safety record. In the USA, where it is estimated that well over 1 million neonates are circumcised each year, the Gomco clamp has become the leading instrument used to perform non-ritual male circumcision." Tissue adhesive is widely used in multiple areas of medicine; specifically, multiple observational studies and RCTs have shown cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives to be superior to suture closure in VMMC.
- Intraoperative Duration [ Time Frame: 1 year ]Time it takes for procedure from first manipulation of tissue under local anesthesia to dressing.
- Difficulty in Learning and Performing Technique [ Time Frame: 1 year ]
Evaluated by doctor survey, 5 point Likert scale:
- Gomco technique is much easier
- Gomco technique is easier
- Open surgical technique is easier
- Open surgical technique is much easier
- Time Required for Healing [ Time Frame: Within 6 weeks after surgery ]Time required for healing
- Direct Costs [ Time Frame: Within 6 weeks after surgery ]the cost of labor, supplies and equipment
- Pain Experienced [ Time Frame: 2 days after surgery ]Pain experienced during and after the procedure using Pain Questionnaire with 10 point pain scale (0 signifies no pain and 10 signifies maximal pain)
- Overall Patient Satisfaction [ Time Frame: Within 6 weeks after surgery ]Patient satisfaction evaluated with patient satisfaction questionnaire using five point Likert scale.
- Cosmetic Result [ Time Frame: Within 6 weeks after surgery ]Cosmetic result evaluated by classification of scar line as regular (straight without any irregularity), irregular (not completely straight), or scalloped (with a wavy appearance).
- Adverse Events [ Time Frame: 1 yr ]Intraoperative and post-operative adverse events, such as bleeding, hematoma, and infection
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01688310
|Centro de Saúde São Lucas, UCM|
|Beira, Sofala, Mozambique|
|Principal Investigator:||Peter Millard, MD, PhD||Universidade Catholic de Mozambique|