Comparison of the Right and Left Internal Jugular Vein Using Ultrasound
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01599299|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : May 16, 2012
Last Update Posted : March 6, 2014
The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a difference between the diameter, and the cross-sectional area of the right internal in left internal jugular vein in preoperative, mechanically ventilated patients.
Secondary the relationship between the internal jugular vein to the common carotid artery will be examined.
|Condition or disease|
|Comparison of the Right and Left Internal Jugular Vein Using Ultrasound|
Placement of a central venous catheter (CVC) for surgery is used for hemodynamic monitoring and venous access. Most often the right internal jugular vein (RIJV) is used. The RIJV is preferred over the left-sided internal jugular vein (LIJV) because cannulation of the LIJV is more difficult and associated with a higher complication rate(1). A possible explanation for the higher complication rate can be explained by the difference in diameter between the RIJV and the LIJV. It has been demonstrated that large vessels are easier to catheterize than small ones.
Data suggest that the internal jugular veins are most often asymmetric but data are limited. Until now, there is one small prospective study in which 80 ICU patients where examined (30 patients were mechanically ventilated) which showed an asymmetry in 62,5% and a dominant RIJV in 68% and a smaller study performed by Lobato and colleagues in which 50 healthy patients were examined. They measured the cross-sectional areas of the internal jugular veins. They showed that in 80% the RIJV was greater than the LIJV. Two CT studies has been done so far. In 2009 Tartière and colleagues carried out an observational study in 190 patients. All patients were in the supine position, neutral head position an spontaneous breathing. During the CT patients were asked to hold there breath. The study showed that the diameter and cross-sectional area of the RIJV were significantly greater than those of the LIJV. A smaller retrospective CT-study (88 patients) performed by Lim et al in 2006 showed a larger RIJV in 79,5% compared to the LIJV.
Until now, there are no data known about the difference between the RIJV and LIJV in preoperative mechanical ventilated patients when ultrasound is used.
|Study Type :||Observational|
|Actual Enrollment :||100 participants|
|Official Title:||Comparison of the Diameter, Cross-sectional Area and Position of the Left and Right Internal Jugular Vein in Adults Using Ultrasound|
|Study Start Date :||March 2012|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||June 2012|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||July 2012|
Ultrasound, internal jugular vein
All patients who will need a central venous access (into the right jugular vein) preoperative are included.
- Comparison of the diameter, cross-sectional area and position of the left and right internal jugular vein in adults using ultrasound [ Time Frame: Measurements are made after the patient is intubated and ventilated, prior to the surgical procedure starts. ]Comparison of the cross-sectional area and diameter of the left internal jugular vein and the right internal jugular vein
- Comparison of the diameter, cross-sectional area and position of the left and right internal jugular vein in adults using ultrasound [ Time Frame: Measurements are made after the patient is intubated and ventilated, prior to the surgical procedure starts. ]The localisation of the right/left internal jugular vein in relation to the carotid artery.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01599299
|Eindhoven, Brabant, Netherlands, 5623 EJ|