Don't get left behind! The modernized ClinicalTrials.gov is coming. Check it out now.
Say goodbye to ClinicalTrials.gov!
The new site is coming soon - go to the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Central Nervous System B-Cell Lymphoma

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01511562
Recruitment Status : Active, not recruiting
First Posted : January 18, 2012
Last Update Posted : August 17, 2021
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology

Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to find out what effects (good and/or bad) treatment with chemotherapy and stem cell transplant compared with chemotherapy alone will have on primary CNS B-cell lymphoma. Currently the best treatment for patients with primary CNS B-cell lymphoma is not known.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Lymphoma Drug: carmustine Drug: cytarabine Drug: etoposide Drug: thiotepa Procedure: stem cell transplant Drug: G-CSF Phase 2

Detailed Description:

Primary Objective:

To compare the two-year progression-free survival (PFS) of patients treated with the myeloablative consolidation treatment strategy of HDT/ASCT versus those treated with non-myeloablative consolidation chemotherapy with cytarabine and etoposide

Secondary Objectives:

  1. To compare the two-year event-free survival (EFS) of patients treated with consolidation HDT/ASCT versus those treated with consolidation chemotherapy consisting of etoposide and cytarabine
  2. To compare the overall survival (OS) of patients treated with the consolidation HDT/ASCT versus those treated with consolidation chemotherapy consisting of etoposide and cytarabine
  3. To assess the toxicities associated with consolidation HDT/ASCT versus consolidation consisting of etoposide and cytarabine
  4. To determine diffusion MRI metrics (ADCmini, ADC25%, and ADCmean) prior to induction chemotherapy, after one full induction chemotherapy cycle, and at the end of induction chemotherapy as a predictor of response and outcome (CALGB 581101)
  5. To determine brain FDG-PET metrics (tumor SUV and tumor versus background SUV) prior to induction chemotherapy, after one full induction chemotherapy cycle, and at the end of induction chemotherapy as a predictor of response and outcome (CALGB 581101)
  6. To determine whether low baseline ADC measurements are associated with shorter PFS and OS (CALGB 581101)
  7. To determine whether reduction in tumor SUV by > 25% on brain FDG-PET/CT after one cycle of induction therapy is associated with improved PFS and OS (CALGB 581101)
  8. To determine which IHC-based biomarkers are predictive of an adverse prognosis (CALGB 151113)
  9. To determine which IHC-based biomarkers are predictive of a favorable prognosis (CALGB 151113) for BCL6 (B-cell CLL/lymphoma 6), and STAT 6 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 6, interleukin-4 induced)
  10. To analyze tumor tissue for gene expression profiles, and to correlate these profiles with treatment outcomes (CALGB 151113)
  11. To determine whether CSF proteome is a predictor of outcomes (prognostic marker) irrespective of treatment arm (CALGB 151113) for (IL-10 (interleukin 10) and C3 (complement component 3)
  12. To assess the neurocognitive function of patients treated with consolidation HDT/ASCT versus those treated with consolidation chemotherapy (etoposide and cytarabine) as measured by serial administration of the International PCNSL Collaborative Group (IPCG) neurocognitive battery and evaluate the long-term survivorship differences between the two arms (CALGB 71105)

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 113 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Myeloablative Versus Non-Myeloablative Consolidation Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS B-cell Lymphoma
Study Start Date : September 2012
Estimated Primary Completion Date : October 2026

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Lymphoma

Arm Intervention/treatment
Arm I
Patients undergo induction therapy for five cycles as defined in the protocol. Patients undergo stem cell transplant.
Drug: carmustine
Given IV

Drug: thiotepa
Given IV

Procedure: stem cell transplant
Drug: G-CSF
Arm II
Patients undergo induction therapy for five cycles as defined in the protocol. Patients undergo consolidation chemotherapy.
Drug: cytarabine
Given IV

Drug: etoposide
Given IV

Drug: G-CSF



Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. progression free survival [ Time Frame: Up to 10 years ]

Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. event free survival [ Time Frame: Up to 10 years ]
  2. number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0 [ Time Frame: Up to 10 years ]
  3. overall survival [ Time Frame: Up to 10 years ]


Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 75 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria
  1. Documentation of Disease: Diagnosis of primary CNS diffuse large B-cell lymphoma confirmed by one of the following: brain biopsy or resection, cerebrospinal fluid and vitreous fluid.
  2. Other Lymphomas: Patients must have no evidence or history of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) outside of CNS.
  3. Previous Treatment: Patients must have no prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy for lymphoma.
  4. Age- Patients must be between the ages of 18 and 75 years.
  5. Karnofsky Performance Scale - Patients must measure Karnofsky Performance Scale ≥ 30 (≥ 50 for patients ages 60-70).
  6. Pregnancy and Nursing Status - Patients must be non-pregnant and non-nursing; women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test 10-14 days prior to registration; in addition, women and men of childbearing potential must commit to use an effective form of contraception throughout their participation in this study; appropriate methods of birth control include abstinence, oral contraceptives, implantable hormonal contraceptives, or double barrier method (diaphragm plus condom)
  7. HIV - Patients must have negative HIV serology.
  8. Hepatitis - Patients must have negative HCV serology (unless HBsAb positive patient has recently received HBV vaccine, in this case HBcAb should be negative). All patients must be screened for hepatitis B infection before starting treatment. Those patients who test positive for hepatitis B should be closely monitored for evidence of active HBV infection and hepatitis during and for several months after rituximab treatment. PCNSL patients with a history of hepatitis B infection should be treated with entecavir or lamivudine (physician discretion for choice of drug) as antiviral prophylaxis to prevent hepatitis B reactivation.
  9. Organ Transplant or Immunosuppressant Therapy - Patient must have no history of organ transplantation or ongoing immunosuppressant therapy.
  10. Required Initial Laboratory Values: ANC ≥ 1500/mcL, AST and ALT < 2 x upper limit of normal (ULN), total bilirubin ≤ 3 mg/dL, creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min, platelet count ≥ 100,000/mcL

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01511562


Locations
Show Show 126 study locations
Sponsors and Collaborators
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Chair: Tracy Batchelor, MD, MPH Massachusetts General Hospital
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01511562    
Other Study ID Numbers: CALGB-51101
CALGB-51101
CDR0000721927 ( Registry Identifier: NCI Physician Data Query )
NCI-2012-00110 ( Registry Identifier: NCI Clinical Trial Reporting Program )
First Posted: January 18, 2012    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: August 17, 2021
Last Verified: August 2021
Keywords provided by Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology:
primary central nervous system non-Hodgkin lymphoma
contiguous stage II adult diffuse large cell lymphoma
noncontiguous stage II adult diffuse large cell lymphoma
stage I adult diffuse large cell lymphoma
stage III adult diffuse large cell lymphoma
stage IV adult diffuse large cell lymphoma
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Lymphoma
Neoplasms by Histologic Type
Neoplasms
Lymphoproliferative Disorders
Lymphatic Diseases
Immunoproliferative Disorders
Immune System Diseases
Cytarabine
Etoposide
Thiotepa
Carmustine
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic
Antineoplastic Agents
Topoisomerase II Inhibitors
Topoisomerase Inhibitors
Enzyme Inhibitors
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
Antimetabolites
Antiviral Agents
Anti-Infective Agents
Immunosuppressive Agents
Immunologic Factors
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
Alkylating Agents
Myeloablative Agonists