"Laparoscopic" Cystoscopy Versus Traditional Cystoscopy
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01261819|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : December 17, 2010
Last Update Posted : December 21, 2010
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Lower Urinary Tract Injury||Device: cystoscopy||Not Applicable|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||68 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Official Title:||"Laparoscopic" Cystoscopy Versus Traditional Cystoscopy in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: A Prospective Comparison Study|
|Study Start Date :||January 2009|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||July 2009|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||July 2009|
Experimental: transurethral laparoscope
These patients had cystoscopy performed with the transurethral laparoscope.
Active Comparator: Traditional cystoscopy
These patients had cystoscopy performed with the traditional cystoscope, which is considered to be the "gold standard."
- Prospective assessment of safety of a novel technique called transurethral laparoscopic cystoscopy [ Time Frame: 6 weeks ]
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01261819
|United States, Florida|
|Winter Park and Celebration, Florida, United States|
|Principal Investigator:||Katherine Kratz, M.D.||Florida Hospital|