Endobronchial Ultrasound Guided Transbronchial Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in a Tuberculosis-endemic Country
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01156623|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : July 5, 2010
Last Update Posted : February 12, 2015
In lung cancer with enlarged or non-enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and Positron emission tomography (PET) scan frequently show discrepancy in tuberculosis-endemic area. Endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) with ability of real-time nodal sampling possibly improves the nodal diagnosis.
The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of nodal diagnosis of contrast-enhanced CT and PET scan with and without EBUS-TBNA, this study will be performed.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Non-small Cell Lung Cancer||Procedure: EBUS-TBNA||Not Applicable|
Lung cancer remains a fatal disease worldwide, and surgical treatment offers possibility for long-term survival. However, the indication and outcome of surgical resection depends on the pre-operative accurate staging and extent of intra-operative lymph node dissection. Therefore, the accurate lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is crucial for planning optimal treatment. Traditionally, the conventional contrast-enhanced CT essentially identifies enlarged lymph node greater than 1cm as nodal metastasis. Nevertheless, with moderate sensitivity and specificity, contrast-enhanced CT carries substantial risk to under-stage small nodal metastasis and to over-stage inflammatory lymphadenitis.
Positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) provides functional images of tumor metabolism, and has been used as a non-invasive alternative other than contrast-enhanced CT for nodal staging in NSCLC. In the absence of detectable lymph node enlargement by CT, FDG-PET scan were increasingly used to stage the lymph node status for NSCLC in some part of world. Hence, the accuracy of FDG-PET might substantially alter the treatment strategy in an institution where the mediastinoscopy is unavailable for lymph node sampling. However, it is generally agreed that abnormal FDG uptake occurred frequently in granulomatous and inflammatory disease. In an endemic area where tuberculosis is still prevalent; such as Eastern Asia, FDG-PET scan has reportedly shown reduced sensitivity and positive predictive value in nodal staging of NSCLC. Thereby, FDG-PET scan alone does not appear to replace mediastinoscopy for nodal staging of NSCLC in a tuberculosis-endemic area, especially in potentially operable patients without enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes.
The recent development of curved ultrasound probe-equipped bronchoscope, which enables direct and real-time aspiration by endobronchial ultrasound- transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes, has become an less invasive alternative for nodal staging other than mediastinoscopy. By direct nodal sampling, EBUS-TBNA improves lymph node staging from an image basis to a cytology basis; or even, pathology basis. However, the variable sensitivity and negative predictive value of EBUS-TBNA has been reported, especially in lymph node reduced in size after induction chemotherapy. Nevertheless, reports from NSCLC without significant mediastinal lymph node enlargement on CT otherwise suggested EBUS-TBNA exhibited a high sensitivity and specificity for detecting small nodal metastasis. Therefore, whether EBUS-TBNA retains the reportedly high performance of nodal staging in lung cancer patients without enlarged mediastinal lymph node on CT in a TB endemic country; a condition of FDG-PET scan reportedly showed increased false-positive rate, is still unclear.
In present study, we primarily aim at the comparison of accuracy of nodal diagnosis of contrast-enhanced CT and PET scan with and without EBUS-TBNA in a condition of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes of lung cancer. Secondarily, we aim at the accuracy of nodal diagnosis by FDG-PET scan in the same condition, and investigate the characteristics of lymph nodes with false PET result.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||36 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Value of EBUS-TBNA for Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in a Tuberculosis-endemic Country|
|Study Start Date :||June 2010|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||October 2012|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||August 2013|
Experimental: With EBUS-TBNA group
The patients enrolled in present study are those with non-small lung cancer and receive contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and Positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) examination. In this group, further EBUS-TBNA will be arranged if patients agreed it.
All included patients received TBNA for lymph node study via a flexible ultrasonic bronchoscope with a linear scanning probe on the tip (BF-UC206F-OL8, Olympus). The curved-probe scanned parallel to the insertion direction of bronchoscope, and the obtained images were linked to the ultrasound scanner (EU-2000C, Olympus) incorporated with Doppler-flow imaging. Each lymph node greater than 5mm in short axis measured by cursors was selected for subsequent TBNA with a 22-gauge (NA-201SX-4022, Olympus) needle in a condition of real-time EBUS guidance. A cytology examination was sent for pathologist blinded for the clinical history and image result of patients. When a tissue core was obtained by TBNA, the specimen was also sent for pathology study.
No Intervention: Without EBUS-TBNA group
The patients enrolled in present study are those with non-small lung cancer and receive contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and Positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) examination. In this group, no EBUS-TBNA will be arranged if patients refused it despite we advised it.
- Diagnostic accuracy [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ]The results of each diagnostic modality were compared with the surgical pathology obtained by thoracotomy and lymph node dissection. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of each diagnostic modality were calculated as the standard definition.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01156623
|Chang Gung Memorial Hospital|
|Taipei, Taiwan, 10507|
|Principal Investigator:||Fu-Tsai Chung, M.D.||Chang Gung Memorial Hospital|