This site became the new on June 19th. Learn more.
Show more Menu IMPORTANT: Listing of a study on this site does not reflect endorsement by the National Institutes of Health. Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more... Menu IMPORTANT: Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more... Menu
Give us feedback

Study the Average Aerobic Bioburden Levels on Catheters After Use With Egret Catheter and the Predicate Device

This study has been completed.
Information provided by:
Egret Medical Products Inc. Identifier:
First received: May 7, 2010
Last updated: May 14, 2010
Last verified: May 2010
PURPOSE OF EVALUATION: This study will verify & validate the acceptability of Egret's extended use product as compared to the existing daily change-out product. Based on an extensive in-vitro study, Egret's product confirmed significant kill for both positive and negative gram bacteria. In addition to meeting all of the current product requirements, total aerobic bio-burden on the catheters will be tested at various intervals for up to 10 days of use. The current used product will be used as a control group that is to be changed out daily as per current policy. The control group will be tested for total aerobic bacteria counts on the last day of use.

Suction Catheter Bioburder Level After Patient Use.

Study Type: Observational
Study Design: Observational Model: Case Control
Time Perspective: Cross-Sectional
Official Title: Validate the Acceptability of Egret's Extended Use Product as Compared to the Existing Daily Change-out Product

Further study details as provided by Egret Medical Products Inc.:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Measure total aerobic bioburden levels after patient use [ Time Frame: 1 to 10 days ]
    Compare the average aerobic bio-burden level on the extended use Egret catheter to the existing used one day product after clinical use. The Egret catheter was used continuously for up to 10 days.

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • No unexpected adverse events [ Time Frame: 1-10 days ]
    Verify that there were no unexpected adverse events associated with the Egret extended use catheter.

  • Design Ease of Use [ Time Frame: 1-10 days ]
    Obtain feedback from the respiratory care practitioners regarding comparative ease-of-use and design feature preferences between the Egret catheter and the Ballard catheter.

Enrollment: 200
Study Start Date: May 2008
Study Completion Date: March 2010
Primary Completion Date: December 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Existing used daily change-out device
Extended Use Catheter w/BIOSAFE

  Show Detailed Description


Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Sampling Method:   Probability Sample
Study Population
Patients admitted to Medical City who require ventilation

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who agree to consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not agree to consent or with confirmed Ventilator-associated Pneumonia (VAP)are to be excluded from this study.
  Contacts and Locations
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its identifier: NCT01124578

United States, Texas
Medical City Dallas Hospital
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75230
Sponsors and Collaborators
Egret Medical Products Inc.
Principal Investigator: David Barton, BA, RRT, RCP Medical City Hospital, Dallas, TX
  More Information

1.Medical City Dallas Hospital, Policies and Procedures, Policy No. RSCC12 - Endotracheal Suctioning 2.MicroChem Labs - A Study to Measure the Total Aerobic Bacteria on Ballard Suction Catheters During 24 Hours Use with Respiratory Care Patients. This study was conducted to establish a baseline bio-burden count of catheter tips after use. 3.Nelson Laboratories - Bacterial Filtration Efficacy, Report No. 413451. This test was preformed to determine the bacterial filtration efficacy of the filter as per ASTM F2101. 4.Micro-Chem Labs - Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Properties of Sterilized and Non-Sterilized Egret Catheters Versus a Non-Treated Control Catheter During Extended Exposure to S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and K. pneumoniae.

Responsible Party: David Barton, BA, RRT, RCP, Medical City Dallas Hospital Identifier: NCT01124578     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: RT 2008-001
Study First Received: May 7, 2010
Last Updated: May 14, 2010

Keywords provided by Egret Medical Products Inc.:
Ventilators, Mechanical processed this record on August 16, 2017