Does Positive Expiratory Pressure Mask Therapy Improve Recovery From Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease?
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01101282 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : April 9, 2010
Last Update Posted : February 15, 2013
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive Lung Diseases, Obstructive | Device: Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) mask therapy | Not Applicable |
This study aims to identify whether the addition of positive expiratory pressure (PEP) mask therapy to standard medical care improves symptoms, quality of life and risk of re-exacerbation in individuals with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
A PEP mask is a small hand-held device that is self-applied over the nose and mouth. It creates a resistance against exhalation (outward) breaths which helps facilitate movement of sputum from the lungs towards the mouth.
Participants will be recruited from two tertiary metropolitan hospitals in Melbourne, Australia and randomised to receive either 'usual care' (comprising medical management, non-invasive ventilation if required, rehabilitation and allied health interventions) or 'usual care' plus PEP mask therapy for the duration of their hospital admission. All participants will then complete daily diaries for six months after discharge.
The effect of PEP mask therapy will be evaluated using a range of outcomes important to both patients and health care providers.
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 92 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | Single (Outcomes Assessor) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | Does the Addition of Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEP) Mask Therapy to Usual Medical Care Improve Patients' Symptoms, Quality or Life and Risk of Future Exacerbations in Individuals With Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)? |
Study Start Date : | July 2010 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | January 2013 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | January 2013 |

Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: 'Usual care'
Participants will receive 'usual medical care' consisting of the following:
|
|
Experimental: 'Usual care' plus PEP mask therapy
This will comprise:
|
Device: Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) mask therapy
PEP mask therapy will be performed once/day, supervised, by an experienced physiotherapist until hospital discharge or ≥ 24 hours without sputum expectoration (whichever comes first). Written instructions shall also be provided, encouraging two more independent PEP mask sessions per day. Each session will comprise up to 5 cycles of 8-10 slightly active breaths, followed by 2 huffs (FET) and 2 coughs. A target pressure of 10-20 cms H20 during the middle of expiration shall be used (monitored via a pressure manometer). |
- Symptom severity [ Time Frame: Within 48 hours of presenting to hospital (day 1) ]Measured via the Breathlessness, Cough and Sputum Scale (BCSS).
- Symptom severity [ Time Frame: At hospital discharge (up to approx. day 10) ]Measured via the BCSS
- Symptom severity [ Time Frame: 8 weeks following hospital discharge ]Measured via the BCSS
- Symptom severity [ Time Frame: 6 months following hospital discharge ]Measured via the BCSS
- Disease-specific quality of life [ Time Frame: Within 48 hours of presenting to hospital (day 1) ]Measured via the 4-week English (Australian) version of the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).
- Disease-specific quality of life [ Time Frame: 8 weeks following hospital discharge ]Measured via the SGRQ
- Disease-specific quality of life [ Time Frame: 6 months following hospital discharge ]Measured via the SGRQ
- Need for assisted (non-invasive and/or invasive) ventilation during hospitalisation (within, and after 48 hours of presentation to hospital) [ Time Frame: At hospital discharge (up to approx. day 10) ]The number of participants needing non-invasive or invasive ventilation during their inpatient stay shall be assessed. As early non-invasive ventilation is commonly used for the management of acute exacerbations of COPD, this outcome shall be assessed both within and after 48 hours of presentation to hospital. This aims to differentiate usual care from clinical deterioration.
- Hospital length of stay [ Time Frame: At hospital discharge (up to approx. day 10) ]Measured as number of days
- Time to first exacerbation [ Time Frame: 6 months following hospital discharge ]Measured as number of days
- Time to first hospitalisation (due to respiratory illness) [ Time Frame: 6 months following hospital discharge ]Measured as number of days
- Number of acute exacerbations [ Time Frame: 6 months following hospital discharge ]Measured as number of events
- Number of hospitalisations (due to respiratory illness) [ Time Frame: 6 months following hospital discharge ]Measured as number of events
- Total number of hospitalised days [ Time Frame: 6 months following hospital discharge ]Measured as number of hospitalised days
- Lung function (spirometry) [ Time Frame: At hospital discharge (up to approx. day 10) ]e.g. FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC%
- Lung function (spirometry) [ Time Frame: 6 months following hospital discharge ]e.g. FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC%
- Mortality (actual, all cause) [ Time Frame: At hospital discharge (up to approx. day 10) ]Measured as number of events
- Mortality (actual, all cause) [ Time Frame: 6 months following hospital discharge ]Measured as number of events
- Mortality (predicted) [ Time Frame: At hospital discharge (up to approx. day 10) ]Measured via calculation of the BODE index. The BODE index is derived from: Body mass index, Obstruction severity (spirometry), Dyspnoea (MRC dyspnoea scale) and Exercise tolerance (6 minute walk test).
- Mortality (predicted) [ Time Frame: 6 months following hospital discharge ]Measured via BODE index

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | Child, Adult, Older Adult |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria (all of the following criteria must be met):
- The primary reason for hospital admission is an acute exacerbation of clinically diagnosed COPD
- There is evidence of sputum expectoration or they are a chronic sputum producer ('regularly expectorates sputum on most days')
- They are able and willing to provide written, informed consent
- Recent (within the last 6 months) lung function data indicates obstructive lung disease (of any severity), according to the GOLD criteria: post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7 (only if available)
- They have a smoking history of ≥ 10 pack/years (only if diagnosis unclear)
Exclusion Criteria (none of the following criteria must be present):
- They are breathing via an artificial airway (e.g. endotracheal or tracheostomy tube)
- They have a more significant respiratory disease other than COPD (e.g. primary diagnosis of bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, interstitial lung disease, asthma, lung cancer)
- They have had recent (within the last 6 months) lung volume reduction procedure(s) (e.g. surgery, valve or stent insertion, or other), lung transplantation or pneumonectomy
- The intervention is contraindicated (including but not limited to evidence of undrained pneumothorax, significant frank haemoptysis, recent facial, oral, oesophageal or skull surgery/trauma, altered conscious state or inability to co-operate)
- They have poor oxygen saturation at rest (SpO2 < 88%) despite supplemental oxygen delivered via nasal prongs
- They intend to continue performing established ACT routines throughout the study period
- It is more than 48 hours since being admitted as an inpatient to hospital.

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01101282
Australia, Victoria | |
The Austin Hospital | |
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3084 | |
The Alfred Hospital | |
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3181 |
Principal Investigator: | Christian R Osadnik, Bachelor of Physiotherapy | La Trobe University |
Responsible Party: | Christian Osadnik, Physiotherapist, PhD candidate, La Trobe University |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01101282 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
(not yet specified) |
First Posted: | April 9, 2010 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | February 15, 2013 |
Last Verified: | February 2013 |
PEP exacerbation physiotherapy |
airway clearance sputum physical Therapy modalities |
Lung Diseases Lung Diseases, Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive Respiratory Tract Diseases |