Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Early Surgery Versus Conventional Treatment in Infective Endocarditis (EASE)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00750373
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : September 10, 2008
Results First Posted : September 7, 2012
Last Update Posted : April 23, 2015
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Duk-Hyun Kang, Asan Medical Center

Study Description
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information
Brief Summary:
There have been no prospective clinical studies in infective endocarditis comparing early surgery with the conventional treatment strategy based on current guidelines. The purpose of this prospective randomized trial is to compare clinical outcomes of early surgery versus conventional treatment strategy in patients with high embolic risk of infective endocarditis.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Endocarditis Procedure: Valve surgery with removal of vegetations Phase 4

Detailed Description:

Infective Endocarditis is still associated with high mortality (16-25%) and high incidence of embolic events (10-49%), and the optimal therapeutic strategy remains unclear. The benefit of surgery was particularly high in patients with abscess formation, periannular complications, and moderate to severe heart failure related to acute mitral or aortic regurgitation. Retrospective studies reported that valve surgery was associated with improved survival, but the benefit of early surgery has not been adequately studied due to inherent treatment biases and significant differences in baseline characteristics. Embolic indications for surgery are more controversial, and surgery is usually performed in cases of recurrent emboli and persist vegetations despite appropriate antibiotic treatment. The combined risk of early surgery and valve prosthesis needs to be balanced against the potential benefit of preventing embolism and improving survival. Risk-benefit balance changes recently to favor early surgery in patients with high embolic risk of endocarditis for the following reasons. Identification of patients with high risk of embolism becomes possible with the use of transesophageal echocardiography. Patients with vegetation length > 10 mm on transesophageal echocardiography have a significantly higher risk of embolization. With advances in surgical technique, urgent surgery is feasible with low operative mortality, and the success rate of valve repair has been increased.

To the best of our knowledge, there have been no prospective outcome studies comparing early surgery with the conventional treatment strategy based on current guidelines. The purpose of this multi-center, prospective, randomized trial is to compare clinical outcomes of early surgery versus conventional treatment strategy in patients with high embolic risks of infective endocarditis.

Study Design
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 76 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Randomized Comparison of Early Surgery Versus Conventional Treatment Strategy in Patients With High Embolic Risk of Infective Endocarditis
Study Start Date : September 2006
Actual Primary Completion Date : April 2011
Actual Study Completion Date : September 2011

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Endocarditis

Arms and Interventions
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Arm Intervention/treatment
No Intervention: Conventional
Conventional Treatment based on current guidelines
Active Comparator: Surgery
Early surgery within 48 hours of randomization
 Procedure: Valve surgery with removal of vegetations
Early valve repair or replacement with removal of vegetations within 48 hours of randomization
Other Name: early surgery


Outcome Measures
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Number of Participants With In-hospital Death or Clinical Embolic Events [ Time Frame: within 6 weeks from the randomization ]
    The composite of in-hospital death and clinical embolic events confirmed by imaging studies: the acute onset of clinical symptoms or signs of embolism and the occurrences of new lesions, as confirmed by follow-up imaging studies.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. All-cause Death [ Time Frame: up to 6 month after enrollment ]
  2. Recurrences of Infective Endocarditis [ Time Frame: up to 6 months after enrollment ]
  3. All Embolic Events Including Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Embolization Documented by Imaging Studies [ Time Frame: up to 6 months after enrollment ]
  4. Readmission Due to Development of Congestive Heart Failure [ Time Frame: up to 6 months after enrollment ]

Eligibility Criteria
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   15 Years to 80 Years   (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed as infective endocarditis based on modified Duke criteria fulfilling both conditions:

    • severe mitral or aortic regurgitation
    • vegetation length > 10 mm on mitral or aortic valve

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with urgent and emergent indication of surgery based on current guidelines; aortic abscess, moderate to severe heart failure due to valvular regurgitation, periannular complications, fungal endocarditis
  • Prosthetic valve endocarditis
  • Patient without vegetations on echocardiography
  • Patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within 2 weeks before the admission
  • Patients referred from other hospitals more than 7 days after the appropriate antibiotic treatment of infective endocarditis
  • Patients who were not candidates for surgery based on age > 80 years and coexisting malignancies
  • Patients who did not consent to participate
Contacts and Locations
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00750373


Locations
Layout table for location information
Korea, Republic of
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Sponsors and Collaborators
Asan Medical Center
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Duk-Hyun Kang, MD, PhD Department of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine
More Information
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):

Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Duk-Hyun Kang, Professor, Asan Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00750373    
Other Study ID Numbers: 2006-0257
First Posted: September 10, 2008    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: September 7, 2012
Last Update Posted: April 23, 2015
Last Verified: April 2015
Keywords provided by Duk-Hyun Kang, Asan Medical Center:
Endocarditis
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Endocarditis, Bacterial
Endocarditis
Heart Diseases
Cardiovascular Diseases
 Bacterial Infections
Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Infections
Cardiovascular Infections