Phase II Study of Florbetaben (BAY 94-9172) PET Imaging for Detection/Exclusion of Cerebral β-amyloid in Patients With Probable Alzheimer's Disease Compared to Healthy Volunteers
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00750282|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : September 10, 2008
Results First Posted : July 16, 2014
Last Update Posted : July 24, 2014
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Alzheimer Disease Amyloid Beta-Protein||Drug: Florbetaben (BAY94-9172)||Phase 2|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||422 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Single Group Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||An Open-label, Non-randomized, Multi-center Study to Optimize Image Assessment and Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of BAY 94-9172 (ZK 6013443) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) for Detection/Exclusion of Cerebral Amyloid Beta in Patients With Probable Alzheimer's Disease Compared to Healthy Volunteers|
|Study Start Date :||August 2008|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||November 2010|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||November 2010|
|Experimental: Florbetaben (BAY94-9172)||
Drug: Florbetaben (BAY94-9172)
Healthy volunteers and patients with probable Alzheimer's disease receiving single injection of investigational medicinal product BAY 94-9172 followed by subsequent PET imaging sessions
- Specificity and Sensitivity of Florbetaben PET Scans Obtained in Part A Using Two Separate Algorithms and the Onsite Clinical Diagnosis as the Standard of Truth [ Time Frame: 90 - 110 min after investigational medical product (IMP) injection ]
Part A: For the calculation of sensitivity/specificity, a patient with probable AD was expected to have a positive florbetaben PET scan which was considered a match for sensitivity. A HV was expected to have a negative florbetaben PET scan which was considered a match for specificity. Standard of truth was the onsite clinical diagnosis.
Two Beta-Amyloid Plaque Load (BAPL) algorithms for assessing the normality/abnormality of beta-amyloid plaque load in the brain scans were used.
Using algorithm A (Majority Read), a brain scan of a subject with a BAPL score of "1" (without beta-amyloid plaque load) or "2" (with minor beta-amyloid plaque load) was considered normal and a BAPL score of "3" (with significant beta-amyloid plaque load) was considered abnormal.
Using algorithm B (Average), a brain scan of a subject with a BAPL score of "1" was considered normal and a brain scan with a BAPL score of "2" or "3" was considered abnormal. Algorithm B was used in Part B and in the final
- Specificity and Sensitivity of Florbetaben PET Scans Obtained in Part B Using Two Separate Algorithms and the Onsite Clinical Diagnosis as the Standard of Truth. [ Time Frame: 90 - 110 min after IMP injection ]
Part B: For the calculation of sensitivity/specificity, a patient with probable AD was expected to have a positive florbetaben PET scan, ie,abnormal scan (BAPL scores "2" or "3") which was considered a match for sensitivity. A HV was expected to have a negative florbetaben PET scan, ie,normal scan (BAPL score "1") which was considered a match for specificity.
The clinical diagnosis was established by an independent consensus panel (CP) of experts in dementia.
Two independent sets of PET data reads were performed. The first set was performed by a panel of three readers who received live, instructor-led training on the visual assessment procedure. The second set was performed by a panel of five separate readers who were trained on the visual assessment procedure with electronic media.
- Sensitivity and Specificity for All Participants Using Two Additional Imaging Windows for the Visual Assessment [ Time Frame: 45 - 60 min and 110 - 130 min after IMP injection ]PET scans from two additional imaging windows (45-60 min and 110-130 min) were visually assessed
- Kappa Coefficient as a Measure of Agreement Between Readers Concerning the Visual Assessment of Abnormality of the Brain Scan (Based on BAPL Score) [ Time Frame: 45-60 min, 90-110 min, 110-130 min ]The agreement between 3 blinded readers concerning the visual assessment of abnormality of the brain scan (based on BAPL score) was measured by the kappa coefficient. Kappa values close to 1.0 indicate a high agreement while values close to 0 indicate random agreement.
- Standard Uptake Value Ratios for Florbetaben Signal [ Time Frame: 90-110 min post injection ]The Standard Uptake Value Ratios for florbetaben signal in the frontal cortex, lateral temporal cortex, parietal cortex, anterior cingulate, posterior cingulate cortex, occipital cortex, and cerebellum (white matter) were determined as a quantitative measure of tracer uptake. The SUV is defined as the ratio of (1) the tissue radioactivity concentration c (in MBq/kg) at time point t, and (2) the injected activity (in MBq, extrapolated to the same time t) divided by the body weight (in kg). These SUV numbers from regions of interest were then used to derive SUV ratios (SUVR) using the SUV from the cerebellar cortex as reference.)
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00750282
|United States, Arizona|
|Sun City, Arizona, United States, 85351|
|United States, California|
|Stanford, California, United States, 94305|
|United States, Connecticut|
|New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510|
|United States, New York|
|Bronx, New York, United States, 10461|
|New York, New York, United States, 10016|
|New York, New York, United States, 10032|
|United States, Rhode Island|
|Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02906|
|Australia, New South Wales|
|Westmead, New South Wales, Australia, 2145|
|Australia, South Australia|
|Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5000|
|Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia, 3084|
|Erlangen, Bayern, Germany, 91054|
|München, Bayern, Germany, 81377|
|München, Bayern, Germany, 81675|
|Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, 45122|
|Jülich, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, 52425|
|Münster, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, 48149|
|Dresden, Sachsen, Germany, 01307|
|Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany, 04103|
|Berlin, Germany, 13125|
|Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, 650-0017|
|Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, 650-0047|
|Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 113-8603|
|Zürich, Switzerland, 8091|
|Study Director:||Bayer Study Director||Bayer|