Vitrectomy Without Internal Limiting Membrane Removal in the Treatment of Diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema: a Comparative Kenalog Vs Bevacizumab Intravitreal Injection Vs Control Study
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government.
Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00600301
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified January 2008 by Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera en México. Recruitment status was: Recruiting
Diabetic macular edema is the most common cause of visual loss among patients with diabetic retinopathy. Pars plana vitrectomy has been reported to be effective for the treatment of diabetic macular edema. Previous report showed a limited improvement in visual acuity and macular thickness posterior intraoperative triamcinolone acetonide. Bevacizumab intravitreal injection has been proven be effective in the treatment of diabetic macular edema, in recent publications. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether vitrectomy with and without intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and bevacizumab injection affects vision outcome and macular thickness in patients with diabetic macular edema.
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study:
20 Years to 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Diffuse diabetic macular edema
Non proliferative diabetic retinopathy
No VPP previa
No previous treament with laser, Triamcinolone acetonide, and Bevacizumab