Try the modernized beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working… Menu

Comparison of Two Strategies for the Delivery of IPTc

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. Identifier: NCT00376155
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : September 14, 2006
Last Update Posted : February 10, 2017
Medical Research Council
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Brian Greenwood, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Brief Summary:
Antimalarial chemoprophylaxis can reduce morbidity and mortality from malaria in children. However, this approach to malaria control has not been implemented widely because of concerns over its possible effect on the development of resistance and natural immunity. Intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) may be able to achieve some of the beneficial effects of chemoprophylaxis without its drawbacks. Recently, it has been shown that IPT given to Senegalese children under the age of five years on three occasions during the malaria transmission season reduced the incidence of clinical malaria by approximately 90%. However, it is uncertain how this intervention can be most effectively delivered. Therefore, 26 Maternal and Child Health (MCH) trekking clinics in Upper River Division, south of the River Gambia, each with an average catchment population of 400-500 children under 5 years of age, will be randomly allocated to receive IPT from the MCH trekking team or from a IPT dispenser (village health worker, traditional birth attendant or a community mother based in a primary health care village). Treatment with a single dose of sulfadoxine /pyrimethamine (SP) plus three doses of amodiaquine will be given to all study subjects at monthly intervals on three occasions during the months of September, October and November. The primary end points will be the incidence of clinical attacks of malaria detected by passive case detection, and cost-effectiveness of the delivery methods. Important secondary endpoints will be the coverage and the equity of coverage of IPT in preventing malaria morbidity.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Malaria Drug: sulfadoxine /pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine Phase 4

Show Show detailed description

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 14000 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Prevention
Official Title: Comparison of Two Strategies for the Delivery of Intermittent Preventive Treatment in Children (IPTc) in an Area of Seasonal Malaria Transmission
Study Start Date : May 2006
Actual Study Completion Date : February 2007

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Malaria

Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Malaria incidence (the number of OPD attendances with clinical malaria that meet the case definitions as indicated below during the surveillance period ) and the number of hospital admissions with malaria during the surveillance period. [ Time Frame: during malaria transmission period ]
  2. Cost-effectiveness of the delivery system. [ Time Frame: during the study period ]

Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Coverage of IPTC [ Time Frame: During the study period ]
  2. the proportion of children who received three IPT courses on schedule; [ Time Frame: during the study period ]
  3. the proportion of children who received partial or off-schedule IPT courses [ Time Frame: during the study period ]
  4. the proportion of children with no IPT. [ Time Frame: during the study period ]
  5. Unit cost of delivery per fully adherent child. [ Time Frame: during the study period ]
  6. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for each systems of delivery. [ Time Frame: During the study period ]
  7. Mean Hb (g/dl) [ Time Frame: at the end of malaria transmission ]
  8. Prevalence of malaria parasitaemia [ Time Frame: At the end of the malaria transmission season ]

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.

Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   3 Months to 5 Years   (Child)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age between 3 months and 5 years at enrolment.
  2. Informed consent obtained from parents or legal guardians.
  3. No current participation in another malaria intervention trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Previous adverse reaction to treatment with SP or amodiaquine. If this is unknown, then a history of allergic reaction to any drug.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its identifier (NCT number): NCT00376155

Layout table for location information
MRC Laboratories
Banjul, Gambia, PO Box 273
Sponsors and Collaborators
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Medical Research Council
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Kalifa Bojang, MD MRC Laboratories, The Gambia
Publications automatically indexed to this study by Identifier (NCT Number):
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Brian Greenwood, Professor, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Identifier: NCT00376155    
Other Study ID Numbers: ITCRVG47
First Posted: September 14, 2006    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: February 10, 2017
Last Verified: February 2017
Keywords provided by Brian Greenwood, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine:
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Protozoan Infections
Parasitic Diseases
Vector Borne Diseases
Antiprotozoal Agents
Antiparasitic Agents
Anti-Infective Agents
Folic Acid Antagonists
Enzyme Inhibitors
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Anti-Infective Agents, Urinary
Renal Agents