Robotic Assisted Upper-Limb Neurorehabilitation in Stroke Patients (VA ROBOTICS)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00372411|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : September 7, 2006
Results First Posted : January 13, 2014
Last Update Posted : January 13, 2014
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Stroke||Device: Robot-Assisted Therapy - MIT-MANUS System Other: Intensive Comparison Therapy Other: Usual Care||Phase 2|
Primary Hypothesis: The primary hypothesis is that robotic training compared with usual care and intensive comparison therapy will lead to improved upper extremity function. Eligible patients will be randomized to one of three treatment arms: 1) usual care, 2) intensive comparison therapy, or 3) robotic training. Participants assigned to intensive comparison therapy or robot-assisted training will receive treatment for 12 weeks consisting of three one-hour sessions a week and then usual care for the remainder of follow-up. Those assigned to usual care will receive the usual stroke care as delivered at each participating medical center for 36 weeks and then will be offered, as compassionate care, their choice of either robot-assisted or intensive comparison therapy.
Secondary Hypothesis: The secondary hypotheses are that compared with usual care and intensive comparison therapy, robotic treatment will lead to improved quality of life and task performance involving proximal and distal control of the paretic arm. If the robotic arm is effective, two other secondary objects are to evaluate its early (less than 12 week) and late (36 week) effects on the primary and secondary outcomes.
Primary Outcome: The primary study outcome is the change in the Fugl-Meyer score of neurological impairment at 12 weeks relative to baseline.
Secondary Outcome: Secondary outcomes include the Stroke Impact Scale and Wolf Motor Function Test. A cost-effectiveness analysis is planned but only will be conducted if robotic training is more effective than usual care.
Study Abstract: CSP #558 will be a randomized, multi-center, outpatient phase II trial to assess the safety and efficacy of robot-assisted therapy for neurorehabilitation in stroke patients with moderate to severe upper extremity impairment.
The target sample is 158 patients: 26 usual care, 66 intensive comparison therapy and 66 robot training. This sample size will provide 90% power to detect a 5-point mean difference in the Fugl-Meyer scale between robot training and usual care and 3-point mean difference between robot training and intensive comparison therapy. There will be one interim analysis of the primary endpoint at 12 months for the purpose of sample size re-estimation using an adaptive design. The planned study duration is 33 months with 24 months of intake and nine months of follow-up.
If robotic training proves to be beneficial it will not only provide a functionally-oriented and neurophysiologically appropriate therapy, but also will make more widely available high-quality, evidence-based rehabilitative care at a time when there is a shortage of experienced therapists and a progressively growing rehabilitative need for veterans and all Americans.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||127 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||Single (Outcomes Assessor)|
|Official Title:||CSP #558 - Robotic Assisted Upper-Limb Neurorehabilitation in Stroke Patients|
|Study Start Date :||December 2005|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||July 2009|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||August 2009|
Experimental: Arm 1
Robot-Assisted Therapy - MIT-MANUS System
Device: Robot-Assisted Therapy - MIT-MANUS System
The MIT-MANUS robot consists of four modules to train the entire upper limb: module A: shoulder-elbow; module B: anti-gravity; module C: wrist, and module D: hand-unit. Training will be given for 12 weeks and is divided into 4 consecutive blocks, with 9 training sessions per block.
Active Comparator: Arm 2
Intensive Comparison Therapy
Other: Intensive Comparison Therapy
The intensive comparison therapy protocol being used in CSP#558 was developed and field-tested at the Burke Rehabilitation Hospital. It exposes the patient to the identical number of treatments, time, and intensity that robot treated patients will receive (12 weeks, 3 times per week). Therapy sessions can be conducted on back-to-back days if needed and on more than 3 days a week (with approval from the Study Chairman) over a treatment period of up to 14 weeks in order to complete the 36 treatment sessions. During each 1-hour session, subjects participate in therapy in four successive stages: 1) warm-up and assisted stretching; 2) active arm treatments; 3) goal-directed planar reaching, and 4) functionally based Neurodevelopment Techniques (NDT)/Bobath arm training (Bobath, 1979).
Other Name: ICT
Other: Usual Care
The usual chronic stroke care as delivered at each participating medical center
- Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Motor Recovery (FM) Scale [ Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 weeks minus baseline ]Fugl-Meyer (FM) is a standard instrument for the quantitative clinical assessment of motor impairment and function. In this study the upper extremity subsection of the FM was used. The FM assesses several impairment dimensions by using a 3 point ordinal scale: 0 = cannot perform, 1 = can perform partially and 2 = can perform fully. These measures are summed to an overall score is Scoring for upper extremity FM ranges from 0 (worst, completely plegic) to 66 (best, normal). Higher scores indicate better functioning. Outcome measure is the change in the FM score at 6, 12, 24 and 36 weeks relative to baseline.
- Stroke Impact Scale [ Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 weeks minus baseline ]The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) is stroke specific, self-reported measure that evaluates function and quality of life in eight clinically relevant domains. The domains of hand function, activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, mobility, and social participation were used; total score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher values indicating better functioning. Outcome is change at 6, 12, 24 and 36 weeks relative to baseline.
- Wolf Motor Function Test [ Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 weeks minus baseline ]The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) is a functionally-based test designed to provide an objective measure of both proximal (during tasks such as lifting the hand from table to box top) and distal control (grasping pencil, bringing soda can to mouth) of the paretic arm for patients after stroke or traumatic brain injury. The WMFT consists of 17 items, of which 15 measure time to perform functional tasks. The tasks are averaged to produce a score in seconds that ranges from 0 to 120 seconds, with higher scores indicating worse functioning. Outcome measure is the change in the Wolf score at 6, 12, 24 and 36 weeks relative to baseline.
- Change in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 12 Weeks Relative to Baseline [ Time Frame: 12 weeks minus baseline ]The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain is a self report scale ranging from 0 (no Pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
- Change in the Modified Ashworth Scale for Spasticity at 12 Weeks Relative to Baseline [ Time Frame: 12 weeks minus baseline ]The Modified Ashworth Scale for spasticity is a measurement of spasticity across 9 muscle groups. Each muscle group is scored on a 0 to 5 scale with higher scores indicating worse functioning. The total score is the average score from the 9 muscle groups and ranges from 0 to 5 with higher scores indicating worse functioning.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00372411
|United States, Connecticut|
|VA Connecticut Health Care System (West Haven)|
|West Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06516|
|United States, Florida|
|North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System|
|Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32608|
|United States, Maryland|
|VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore|
|Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201|
|United States, Rhode Island|
|Providence VA Medical Center|
|Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02908-4799|
|United States, Washington|
|VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle|
|Seattle, Washington, United States, 98108|
|Study Chair:||Albert Lo, MD PhD||Providence VA Medical Center|