Mini- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Medium-Sized, High-Density, Non-Lower Pole, Renal Stones
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04856722 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Recruiting
First Posted : April 23, 2021
Last Update Posted : April 23, 2021
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Renal Stone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy | Procedure: mini-PNL Procedure: RIRS Procedure: SWL | Not Applicable |
The treatment options for renal stones 10-20 mm include either extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) or endourology (retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL).
SWL is an attractive treatment option for renal stones because it is non-invasive and more acceptable for the patient and can be done under analgesia, sedation, or minimal anaesthesia. However, the limitation of SWL includes a relatively lower stone-free rate (SFR) and the need for repeated sessions and auxiliary procedures. The SFR after SWL is affected by several factors, including body mass index (BMI), stone size, intrarenal stone location, skin-to-stone distance (SSD), and stone density.
The EAU guidelines put endourology and SWL as two equal options in medium-sized non-lower pole renal stones and did not give special attention to the stone density, which is an important predictor for SWL outcome. Several studies reported that the number of SWL sessions increased with increased stone attenuation value (SAV) and SFR decreased significantly in high-density renal stone.
PNL and RIRS have good SFR compared to SWL but might entail a significant risk of morbidity. The improved fURS instrumentation and lithotripsy technology, and development of the miniaturized PNL technique, may lower the procedure-related complications and mPNL and RIRS an alternative and excellent option for medium-sized and even large renal stones The investigators hypothesize that addressing the stone density factor may give a clear recommendation for medium-sized, high-density renal stones. They expected the superiority for either mPNL or RIRS, regarding SFR, without increased morbidity.
The study aims to compare the outcome of mPNL, RIRS, and SWL for treatment of non-lower pole, high-density renal stones of 10 to 20 mm size.
The study will include adult patients with non-lower pole, high-density (>1000 HU) renal stones of 10 to 20 mm size.
Pre-operatively, patients will be evaluated by medical history taking, physical examination. urinalysis, urine culture, complete blood cell count (CBC), liver function tests, coagulation profile, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine, plain abdominal X-ray and computed tomography for urinary tract (CT-UT), Eligible patients will be randomly divided into 3 equal groups. PNL group, in which PNL procedures will be performed using miniature nephroscope, RIRS group, in which RIRS will be performed using flexible ureteroscope and SWL group, in which SWL procedures will be performed using Dornier Lithotripter.
post-operatively, patients will be followed up regularly, for 3 months. The SFR, complication rate, cost, patients' and surgeon's satisfaction will be evaluated and compared between the three groups using the appropriate statistical tests and analytical program.
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Estimated Enrollment : | 180 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Masking: | None (Open Label) |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | Mini- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (mPNL), Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS), and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL) for Treatment of Medium-Sized, High-Density, Non-Lower Pole, Renal Stones: A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study |
| Actual Study Start Date : | April 5, 2021 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date : | June 1, 2022 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date : | July 1, 2022 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: mini-PNL group
In which PCNL will be performed using miniature nephroscope
|
Procedure: mini-PNL
PCNL using miniature nephroscope. The procedure will be performed under general or regional anaesthesia under fluoroscopy guidance. |
|
Experimental: RIRS group
In which RIRS will be performed using a flexible ureteroscope
|
Procedure: RIRS
RIRS using flexible ureteroscope. The procedure will be performed under general or regional anaesthesia under fluoroscopy guidance. Holmium Laser lithotripter will be used for stone fragmentation. |
|
Experimental: SWL group
In which extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy will be performed using Dornier lithotripter SII
|
Procedure: SWL
SWL using Dornier SII lithotripter. the procedure will be performed under sedoanalgesia, and fluoroscopy will be used for stone localization; for a maximum of 3 SWL session. |
- Stone-free rate [ Time Frame: as detected by non-contrasted computed tomography 3 months after the intervention procedures. ]Stone free status is defined as no residual renal stone or residual fragment(s) less than 4 mm size.
- Complication rate [ Time Frame: up to 3 months. ]
- Cost of treatment [ Time Frame: throughout the study procedure, up to 3 months post-operative. ]The cost of each treatment methods will be estimated, Including the devices, disposable instruments, operating room, bed stay, imaging, laboratory, medications, retreatment and ancillary procedures.
- Patients satisfaction [ Time Frame: throughout the study procedure, up to 3 months post-operative ]A 5-point scale will be used to assess satisfaction, where 1 is unsatisfied and 5 fully satisfied.
- Surgeon's satisfaction. [ Time Frame: throughout the study procedure, up to 3 months post-operative ]A 5-point scale will be used to assess satisfaction, where 1 is unsatisfied and 5 fully satisfied.
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients (both genders)
- Single non-lower pole renal stone.
- Stone size: 10-20 mm.
- Stone density: > 1000 HU.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant women.
- Morbid obesity.
- Severe orthopaedic deformities.
- Co-morbidities precluding general anaesthesia or prone positioning.
- Uncorrectable coagulation disorders.
- Active urinary tract infection (UTI).
- Stone in a calyceal diverticulum.
- Abnormal renal anatomy.
- Urinary tract obstruction distal to the stone.
- Concomitant pathology that needs intervention in the same setting.
- Advanced hydronephrosis.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04856722
| Contact: Abul-fotouh Ahmed, MD | 00201001066756 | abulfotouhahmed@yahoo.com |
| Egypt | |
| Urology Department, Al-Azhar University Hospital | Recruiting |
| Cairo, Egypt, 11633 | |
| Contact: Ahmed Fahim, MD 002025107333 urologyhospital@gmail.com | |
| Sub-Investigator: Hassan Abdelazeim, MD | |
| Responsible Party: | Abul-fotouh Ahmed, Professor of Urology and Andrology, Al-Azhar University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT04856722 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
Uro_Azhar_11_021 |
| First Posted: | April 23, 2021 Key Record Dates |
| Last Update Posted: | April 23, 2021 |
| Last Verified: | April 2021 |
| Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
| Plan to Share IPD: | Undecided |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
|
Kidney Calculi Nephrolithiasis Calculi Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
Kidney Diseases Urologic Diseases Urolithiasis Urinary Calculi |

