Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Blocks Alternative to Sedation

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04842227
Recruitment Status : Not yet recruiting
First Posted : April 13, 2021
Last Update Posted : April 27, 2021
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
London Health Sciences Centre
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Habib Khan, Lawson Health Research Institute

Brief Summary:
Current practice is to implant cardiac electronic devices using intravenous sedation with midazolam and fentanyl, as well as local injection of anesthetic (1-2). However, some patients do not tolerate sedation and develop nausea/vomiting, delirium/confusion, allergic reactions, and hemodynamic instability with sedation (2-4). Many patients are poor candidates for procedural sedation due to inadequate fasting before the procedure or prior adverse effects of procedural sedation. Pain control is usually adequate, but a large portion of patients still experience pain or discomfort at the implant site if the local anesthetic did not reach every component of the tissue in the surgical field. Meanwhile, nerve block procedures have been used for decades to improve peri-operative and post-operative pain and reduce sedation requirements. With the introduction of ultrasound, the investigators are able to direct delivery of local anesthetic to anesthetize the supraclavicular and pectoralis nerves that supply sensory/pain sensation to the surgical site. Similar techniques have been well described as safe and effective (5-10). The investigators hypothesize this will improve pain control during and after surgery, reduce or eliminate the need for intravenous sedation and improve the safety of the procedure.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Pacemaker Implantation ICD Implantation Procedure: Nerve block Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

Inpatients who are consented to have cardiac device implantation will be given study information as soon as the decision to implant a device is reached. The patients will have time to decide to participate in the study up until they are called for the procedure (2-72 hours, most commonly > 24 hours). The decision to participate in the study is conveyed to the investigator in the holding room, and written consent is obtained if the patient agrees to participate in the study.

The nerve block is performed in the holding room as a 2-step procedure by trained physicians.

After the nerve block approximately 30-60 minutes will be allowed for the anesthetic to take effect prior to the cardiac device implantation procedure. The patient will be monitored by the nurses in the holding room. Once the patient is taken to the operating room and prepped for the cardiac device implantation procedure, testing of the nerve blocks is performed. The superficial pin-prick test will be performed to determine the success of the SCN block, and a deeper test will be performed with a 22ga needle to ensure the deeper muscular layers are anesthetized and the PECs I block is successful. If both blocks are successful, the patient will receive optional light sedation with midazolam 0.01 mg/kg based on their preference, and the procedure can commence. If either the SCN or PECs blocks are not successful based on the sensation test, usual care is provided.

Immediately after the procedure, the patient is asked to rate the pain during the procedure on a numerical scale. Any adverse effects reported by the patient will be documented. The patient will then be reassessed 1 hour after the procedure in the holding room and then called the following day. One of the investigators will contact the patient by telephone on the following day (24hr later), and perform a similar assessment. The assessment will involve inquiring how the patient is feeling, documenting any unintended adverse effects, and asking the patient to rate their pain on a numerical scale.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 20 participants
Allocation: N/A
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Official Title: Regional Anesthesia for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation
Estimated Study Start Date : May 1, 2021
Estimated Primary Completion Date : December 31, 2021
Estimated Study Completion Date : March 31, 2022

Intervention Details:
  • Procedure: Nerve block

    Step 1: A small amount of local anesthetic (3-5cc of 0.5% ropivacaine) is administered under ultrasound guidance in the area of the supraclavicular nerve at the base of the neck under sterile conditions. This provides dense anesthesia of the skin and eliminates the need to introduce larger quantities of local anesthetic directly to the skin around the incision (usually 20mL).

    The second step involves introducing 10-15cc of 0.5% ropivacaine under ultrasound guidance into the compartment between the pectoralis major and minor muscles to anesthetize the medial and lateral pectoral nerves. NOTE: Usual care involves "blind" administration of local anesthetic diffusely to the tissues in this region without targeting any particular nerves, and requires larger volumes of anesthetic (40mL for the "blind approach" vs 10-15mL for the nerve block).



Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Acute anesthesia of skin and tissue [ Time Frame: 30 minutes after nerve block ]
    Needle prick test will be used over the subjected area to assess the nerve block. This will be measured as binary outcome (1-yes blocked ; 0 - not blocked). The region of anesthesia will also be measured by using an illustration to demarcate the region of block on the skin. The dermatomal distribution of the block will be measured in cm2.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Pain score [ Time Frame: 0 hour of completion of device implant, 1 hour post procedure and 1 day post procedure. ]
    Pain score analog will be used to quantify the amount of pain during the procedure. Pain analog score is between 1-10 (1 being no pain to 10 being severe pain).

  2. IV sedation and pain [ Time Frame: 0 hour ]
    Quantify amounts(milligram) of additional sedation or pain relief required intravenously during the procedure

  3. Duration of procedure [ Time Frame: 0 hour ]
    Quantify time required to complete the block

  4. Safety of the nerve block [ Time Frame: Day 1 ]
    Any associated complications from the nerve blocks will be listed in a enumerated way and added together.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. > 18 years old,
  2. Undergoing cardiac device implantation in the suprapectoral area of the chest.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior neck surgery ipsilateral to the device implantation site
  2. Infection over the injection site
  3. BMI ≥ 35
  4. Uncooperative patient
  5. Patient unable to provide consent
  6. Patient has a pre-existing implanted cardiac device in the left chest wall area
  7. Device implantation is booked in less than 2 hours.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04842227


Locations
Layout table for location information
Canada, Ontario
London Health Sciences Centre Res. Inc. (Ont.)
London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5A5
Contact: Habib I Khan       habib.khan@lhsc.on.ca   
Contact: Pavel Antiperovitch       pavel.antiperovitch@lhsc.on.ca   
Sub-Investigator: Pavel Antiperovitch         
Principal Investigator: Habib Khan         
Sponsors and Collaborators
Habib Khan
London Health Sciences Centre
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Habib Khan, Assistant Professor in Cardiology, Lawson Health Research Institute
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04842227    
Other Study ID Numbers: 10942
First Posted: April 13, 2021    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: April 27, 2021
Last Verified: April 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No