Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Efficacy of Combination Taping Technique vs Ankle Foot Orthosis on Improving Gait Parameters in Cerebral Palsy

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04839939
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : April 9, 2021
Last Update Posted : April 14, 2021
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Taif University
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Mohamed A. Abdel Ghafar, Batterjee Medical College

Brief Summary:

Gait in children with spastic CP is often characterized by abnormal gait kinematics as knee flexion and equines foot which associated with such gait deviations, an elevated walking energy cost is often observed which may contribute to activity limitations.

The ability to maintain proper joint alignment of the lower extremity, and control the position of the foot in standing and walking is a critical treatment objective for gait in children with cerebral palsy. Lower extremity orthoses, such as ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are widely recommended in children with spastic cerebral palsy to prevent the development or progression of this deformity and to improve the dynamic efficiency of the child's gait. The use of Kinesio taping in pediatric rehabilitation becomes increasingly popular in recent years. Recent systematic reviews reported moderate evidence that Kinesiology taping is a useful adjunct to physiotherapy intervention in higher functioning children with CP. Combination tapings is a technique first introduced by Kenzo Kase, in which Kinesio taping is coupled with the rigid athletic tape to maximize the treatment benefits. This approach remains briefly addressed in the literature with no prior studies has examined the effects of combination tapings in the CP pediatric population. Hypothesis: there is no difference between the effect of combining tapings and ankle-foot orthosis on spatiotemporal gait parameters in spastic cerebral palsied


Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Gait Spastic Diplegia Other: Conventional physical therapy Other: Ankle Foot Orthosis Other: Combination Taping Not Applicable

Detailed Description:
This study was designed as a randomized controlled trial. The participants and their parents were given clear, detailed explanation of the proposed procedures before starting the experiment, and signed a written informed consent statement. Batterjee Medical College Research and Ethical committee reviewed and approved the study, which were conducted in compliance with the 1975 Helsinki Declaration. Thirty-six children (22 males and 14 females) with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy were enrolled in this study. The children were randomly assigned into two study groups (A & B), and a control group (C). Randomization was done by asking each child to pick up an index card out of a box that contains 36 cards (12 cards for each group) to determine which group participants would be in. Measurements were taken in two occasions, baseline, and four weeks after application of the intervention. Spatiotemporal Gait parameters were measured as per the published guidelines using the GAITRite system. Parameters included were cadence, step length; stride length, single support time, double support time, and velocity were evaluated.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 36 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Short Term Efficacy of Combination Taping Technique as an Alternative to Ankle Foot Orthosis on Improving Gait Parameters in Spastic Cerebral Palsy: A Controlled Randomized Study
Actual Study Start Date : January 1, 2021
Actual Primary Completion Date : March 15, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date : March 30, 2021

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arm Intervention/treatment
Active Comparator: Control Group
Children in this group received conventional physical therapy program in form of Stretching for tight muscles, weak muscles Strengthening, Postural reactions training, Proprioceptive training, and Walking training were all part of the treatment plan, which was based on the neurodevelopmental approach.
Other: Conventional physical therapy
Stretching for tight muscles, weak muscles Strengthening, Postural reactions training, Proprioceptive training, and Walking training

Experimental: AFO Group
Children in this group received the same conventional treatment plus they were provided with solid community-prescribed AFO with a wearing schedule of 6-12 hours per day. Parents were given a detailed demonstration about how to use the AFO probably and watching for areas of skin overpressure. AFO needs to be worn with a smooth, long sock underneath with the child's heel is right down in the AFO with the ankle strap and/or shoe fastened firmly.
Other: Ankle Foot Orthosis
Solid prescribed AFO with a wearing schedule of 6-12 hours per day

Experimental: Combination Taping Group
Children in this group received the same conventional treatment plus the combination taping technique, which was performed by one qualified physical therapist with over five years of experience. The technique started with the application of two 5-cm wide Kinesio tape "I" straps. The first strap was applied from the lateral condyle of the tibia to the base of the first metatarsal bone with the ankle joint in plantar flexion. The tape was not stretched for 5 cm from the initial site and was then stretched up to 30% for the remaining parts15. The second "I" strap While the therapist holds the ankle in dorsiflexion, he applied the distal end of the tape 10 cm below the ankle joint. With almost 70% tension, the proximal end is applied 10 cm above the ankle joint. While one hand was holding each end of the tape, the child was asked to move the joint into plantar flexion. Finally, both hands moved towards the middle of the joint to apply the remaining tape.
Other: Combination Taping
Combination between elastic and inelastic taping




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Step Length (cm) [ Time Frame: 4 Weeks ]
    Change of the step length was measured using GAITRite System

  2. Stride Length (cm) [ Time Frame: 4 Weeks ]
    Change of the stride length was measured using GAITRite System

  3. Velocity (cm/s) [ Time Frame: 4 weeks ]
    Change of the velocity was measured using GAITRite System

  4. Cadence (step/min) [ Time Frame: 4 weeks ]
    Change of the cadence was measured using GAITRite System

  5. Single leg support (% of gait cycle) [ Time Frame: 4 weeks ]
    Change of the single leg support was measured using GAITRite System

  6. Double leg support (% of gait cycle) [ Time Frame: 4 weeks ]
    Change of the double leg support was measured using GAITRite System



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   8 Years to 15 Years   (Child)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age range from 8 to 15 years old
  • Able to stand and walk independently
  • Spasticity ranged from 1 to 1+ grade according to Modified Ashworth Scale
  • level I or II according to Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
  • Able to understand and follow instructions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with previous corrective orthopedic surgery or botulinum toxin injection in the lower extremities within the previous 6 months
  • Skin disease
  • Epilepsy
  • Mental retardation
  • Visual or auditory problems

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04839939


Locations
Layout table for location information
Saudi Arabia
Fizik Center For Physiotherapy
Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 23521
Sponsors and Collaborators
Batterjee Medical College
Taif University
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Mohamed M. Abdel Ghafar, Ph.D Batterjee Medical College
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Mohamed A. Abdel Ghafar, Associate Professor, Batterjee Medical College
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04839939    
Other Study ID Numbers: Batterjee
First Posted: April 9, 2021    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: April 14, 2021
Last Verified: April 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by Mohamed A. Abdel Ghafar, Batterjee Medical College:
Combination Taping
Ankle foot orthosis
Spatio-temporal paremeters
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Muscle Spasticity
Cerebral Palsy
Brain Damage, Chronic
Brain Diseases
Central Nervous System Diseases
Nervous System Diseases
Muscular Diseases
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Muscle Hypertonia
Neuromuscular Manifestations
Neurologic Manifestations