Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Therapeutic Adherence of Multiple Sclerosis Patients (FELSA-SEP)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04837352
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : April 8, 2021
Last Update Posted : January 6, 2022
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Lille Catholic University

Brief Summary:
The goal of this study is to assess the role of sociocognitive and interpersonal factors in the therapeutic adherence of multiple sclerosis patients. This study will provide a better understanding of the socio-psychological issues associated with different types of non-adherence to treatment, and identify the risk factors and vulnerability of each patient.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment
Multiple Sclerosis Other: Study of the role of sociocognitive factors

Detailed Description:

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic and progressive disease that affects young adults (between 20 and 40 years old), impacting significantly the patients quality of life.

The adherence to therapy affects the long-term functional clinical course (lower risk of relapses, reduction in disability progression and quality of life). The non-adherence rate to therapy in multiple sclerosis is estimated at 40%. The main identified causes of non-adherence are: forgetting to take treatment and adverse effects of drugs.

Sociocognitive models as the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) have been developed to help to understand and predict health-related behaviours. This model postulates that the intention to adopt a behaviour is one of the major determinants in the context of health. This intention comes from three independent elements :

  • Personal positive or negative attitudes towards the behaviour,
  • Social expectations or entourage perception (subjective norms),
  • Difficulty in accomplishing this behaviour (perceived control)

Multiple sclerosis adherence to therapy studies have mainly focused on somatic variables (physical disability, illness duration, type of treatment) and some clinical variables (cognitive impairment, fatigue, depression). The few studies that have examined the multiple sclerosis therapeutic adherence determinants have mainly taken a one-dimensional perspective, such as perceived control.

In the FELSA-SEP study, the role of sociocognitive factors (norms and beliefs, perceived threat to disease and health behaviours) and interpersonal factors (social support, patient-doctor relationship) will be explored.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Observational
Estimated Enrollment : 153 participants
Observational Model: Other
Time Perspective: Prospective
Official Title: Obstacles and Levers of the Therapeutic Adherence of Multiple Sclerosis Patients
Actual Study Start Date : November 30, 2021
Estimated Primary Completion Date : November 30, 2024
Estimated Study Completion Date : November 30, 2024

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Group/Cohort Intervention/treatment
Multiple sclerosis patients
Patients with multiple sclerosis over 18 years old who have already started a long-term treatment and consent to participate to the study
Other: Study of the role of sociocognitive factors
Questionnaires




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Therapeutic adherence evaluated by a Likert scale [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
    This 19-item self-questionnaire provides 5 sub-scores corresponding to each of the sub-dimensions (Attitudes, Subjective norms, Perception of control, Behavioural intention and Behaviour) and an overall score (sum of the 5 sub-scores).


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Perceived threat measured with a self-assessment form [ Time Frame: 3 weeks ]
    The perceived threat will be measured with a self-assessment form using a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). This 11-item self-questionnaire provides 2 sub-scores and an overall score (sum of the 2 sub-scores).

  2. Perceived interpersonal relationships quality measure by the perceived social support questionnaire (QSSP) [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
    • The QSSP is a 6 items questionnaire which assess availability and satisfaction with respect to perceived social support.
    • 4-Point ordinal Alliance Scale (11-items 4-PAS). This self-questionnaire concerns the patient's perception about the therapeutic alliance.

  3. Perceived interpersonal relationships quality measure by the 4-Point ordinal Alliance Scale (11-items 4-PAS) [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
    The 4-Point ordinal Alliance Scale (11-items 4-PAS). This self-questionnaire concerns the patient's feelings about the therapeutic alliance and includes eleven items, placing the patient on 5-point scale on : the patient's feeling about the doctor's ability to help him/her; his/her understanding of the symptoms of the illness; the psychological improvement felt; the adaptation to the doctor-patient relationship; the doctor's availability and competence; the clarity of the information given by the doctor and the understanding he/she shows; the doctor's desire of clinical improvement; the quality of the relationship and the understanding of psychological difficulties

  4. Illness duration in days [ Time Frame: 3 weeks ]
    In order to evaluate the vulnerability and protective factors related to somatic disease illness duration will be evaluated.

  5. Handicap will be evaluated by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) [ Time Frame: 3 weeks ]

    In order to evaluate the vulnerability and protective factors related to somatic the handicap will be evaluated by the EDSS. The EDSS quantifies disability in eight Functional Systems (FS) by assigning a Functional System Score in each of these functional systems.

    The clinical meaning of each possible result goes from 0.0: Normal Neurological Exam to 10.0: Death


  6. Relapses number [ Time Frame: 3 weeks ]
    In order to evaluate the vulnerability and protective factors related to somatic disease number of relapses will be evaluated

  7. Fatigue perceived through the FSS (Fatigue Severity Scale) [ Time Frame: 3 weeks ]
    In order to evaluate the vulnerability and protective factors related to somatic disease fatigue will be evaluated. The items are scored on a 7 point scale with 1 = strongly disagree and 7= strongly agree. The minimum score = 9 and maximum score possible = 63. Higher the score = greater fatigue severity.

  8. Cognitive disorders through the SDMT (Symbol Digit Modalities Test) [ Time Frame: 3 weeks ]
    In order to evaluate the vulnerability and protective factors related to somatic disease cognitive disorders will be evaluated The SDMT is a sign coding test that assesses attentional abilities (sustained attention and speed of processing information). Participants are required to use a coded key to match nine abstract symbols paired with numerical digits. The final score is the correct number of substitutions in 90 seconds, and scores range between 0 and 110.

  9. Anxiety-depressive symptoms measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [ Time Frame: 3 weeks ]

    The vulnerability and protective factors linked to psychological functioning- as Anxiety-depressive symptoms will be determined.

    - Personality traits: Big Five Inventory-FR questionnaire (BFI-FR)


  10. Personality traits measured by the Big Five Inventory-FR questionnaire (BFI-FR) [ Time Frame: 3 weeks ]

    The vulnerability and protective factors linked to psychological functioning as personality traits will be determined.

    The Big Five personality traits is a suggested grouping for personality traits. The theory identifies five factors:

    • openness to experience (inventive/curious vs. consistent/cautious)
    • conscientiousness (efficient/organized vs. extravagant/careless)
    • extraversion (outgoing/energetic vs. solitary/reserved)
    • agreeableness (friendly/compassionate vs. challenging/callous)
    • neuroticism (sensitive/nervous vs. resilient/confident)



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Sampling Method:   Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Persons with multiple sclerosis who will be recruited during a routine neurological consultation and who present eligibility criterion.
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Multiple sclerosis defined according to McDonald criteria;
  • Already undergone or beginning substantive treatment (self-managed, excluding treatment administered in hospital)
  • Aged ≥ 18 years;
  • Given the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cognitive impairment (score below the 5th percentile);
  • Any associated neurological pathology or serious or chronic somatic disease (cancer);
  • Being under a legal protection measure.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04837352


Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Amélie Lausiaux, MD, PhD 03.20.22.52.69 lansiaux.amelie@ghicl.net
Contact: Valentine Duriez 03.20.22.59.02 duriez.valentine@ghicl.net

Locations
Layout table for location information
France
Hôpital Saint-Vincent de Paul Recruiting
Lille, France, 59000
Contact: Bruno Lenne, PhD         
Hôpital Saint-Philibert Recruiting
Lomme, France, 59462
Contact: Caroline Massot, MD         
Sponsors and Collaborators
Lille Catholic University
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Bruno Lenne Hôpital Saint-Vincent de Paul - Lille
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Lille Catholic University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04837352    
Other Study ID Numbers: RC-P00105
First Posted: April 8, 2021    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: January 6, 2022
Last Verified: January 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by Lille Catholic University:
Theory of Planned Behaviour
Therapeutic adherence
Sociocognitive and interpersonal factors
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Multiple Sclerosis
Sclerosis
Pathologic Processes
Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNS
Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Nervous System Diseases
Demyelinating Diseases
Autoimmune Diseases
Immune System Diseases