MRI Assessment of Cartilage Damage in Tibial Nailing
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04831671 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Active, not recruiting
First Posted : April 5, 2021
Last Update Posted : September 16, 2021
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Fractures of the tibia (shin bone) are frequently treated with a metal nail that is passed down the inside of the bone (an intra-medullary nail). This nail is inserted through the top of the tibia at the level of the knee joint. There are two ways for the nail to be inserted - either through an incision below the patella (kneecap) or above the patella.
The benefit of the incision above the patella is that it can make it technically easier to insert the nail into the correct position. However, the perceived risk of damage to the knee cartilage has prevented this technique from being widely adopted.
The investigators will use MRI scanning to assess the cartilage for damage using both techniques. The results will enable the investigators to determine if the theoretical risk of cartilage damage is found in real-world scenarios and to generate data for further, larger studies.
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Tibial Fractures | Other: Surgical Approach - Infra-patella nailing Other: Surgical Approach - Supra-patella nailing | Not Applicable |
Intra-medullary nailing is a common form of treatment for a variety of tibial shaft fractures. Traditionally this has been done via an infra-patella approach. More recently the use of a supra-patella approach has become more popular. However, there are concerns that the supra-patella approach may cause unacceptable damage to the cartilage of the patello-femoral joint (PFJ).
This study will use a novel MRI technique developed at the University of Cambridge to compare the amount of damage caused to the knee joint by both infra- and supra-patella nailing techniques. Specific cartilage assessment sequences will enable a fuller assessment of cartilage damage than can be achieved with normal structural sequences. Participants will also be asked to complete Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) regarding their injury to assess their clinical outcome.
Infra-patella and supra-patella nailing techniques are now both routine methods of carrying out intra-medullary nailing of the tibia. Further evidence is required, however, in order to fully assess whether one method is superior to the other.
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Estimated Enrollment : | 20 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Masking: | None (Open Label) |
| Masking Description: | It is not possible to mask participants or investigators as the surgical interventions in each arm will have different scars, making blinding impossible. |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Pilot Randomised Prospective Comparison of Two Approaches for Tibial Nailing Using Clinical and Novel Imaging Outcome Measures |
| Actual Study Start Date : | September 8, 2021 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date : | March 2023 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date : | March 2023 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Infra-patella nailing
Participants will have their closed tibial shaft fracture treated with an intra-medullary nail inserted through an infra-patella approach.
|
Other: Surgical Approach - Infra-patella nailing
The intra-medullary nail will be introduced via an infra-patella incision. |
|
Experimental: Supra-patella nailing
Participants will have their closed tibial shaft fracture treated with an intra-medullary nail inserted through an supra-patella approach.
|
Other: Surgical Approach - Supra-patella nailing
The intra-medullary nail will be introduced via a supra-patella incision. |
- Change in cartilage appearance by MRI Assessment [ Time Frame: Pre-intervention, Day 1 post operatively, 6 months ]Change in cartilage appearance of the ipsilateral knee using MRI scanning
- Change in Lysholm Knee Score [ Time Frame: Pre-intervention, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months ]Change in Lysholm Knee Score (Scored 0-100, higher scores are better)
- Change in Tegner Activity Scale [ Time Frame: Pre-intervention, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months ]Change in Tegner Activity Scale (Scored 0-10, higher scores are move active)
- Change in EQ-5D-5L [ Time Frame: Pre-interventional , 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months ]Change in EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level) (Each domain scored 1-5, lower scores are better)
- Bony Union of Fracture [ Time Frame: 6 weeks ]Bony union will be assessed by plain radiograph
- Bony Union of Fracture [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ]Bony union will be assessed by plain radiograph
- Bony Union of Fracture [ Time Frame: 6 months ]Bony union will be assessed by plain radiograph
- Post-operative Complications [ Time Frame: up to 6 months ]Post operative complications will be recorded
- Return to work/employment status [ Time Frame: 6 months ]Patient return to normal activity will be recorded
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 50 Years (Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Closed tibial shaft fracture suitable for intramedullary nailing
- Able to consent
- Able to undergo MRI scanning
- Able to attend follow up for 6 months post operatively
- Suitable for surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- Polytrauma
- Ipsilateral acute ligamentous knee injury
- A contra-indication to MRI scanning
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04831671
| United Kingdom | |
| Addenbrooke's Hospital | |
| Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom, CB2 0QQ | |
| Principal Investigator: | Andrew Carrothers, FRCS (Tr & Orth) | Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust |
| Responsible Party: | Mr Andrew Carrothers, Consultant Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgeon, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT04831671 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
A095899 |
| First Posted: | April 5, 2021 Key Record Dates |
| Last Update Posted: | September 16, 2021 |
| Last Verified: | September 2021 |
| Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
| Plan to Share IPD: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
|
MRI Cartilage Damage Surgical Techniques |
|
Tibial Fractures Fractures, Bone Wounds and Injuries Leg Injuries |

