Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

LIA vs. LIA + ACB-iPACK Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04808947
Recruitment Status : Not yet recruiting
First Posted : March 22, 2021
Last Update Posted : October 20, 2021
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Women's College Hospital

Brief Summary:
LIA is the mainstay of postoperative analgesia in patients having knee arthroplasty. The combination of ACB-iPACK blocks has also been proposed as an effective analgesic modality for total knee arthroplasty. However, whether combining these two modalities yields any important incremental analgesic benefit remains unclear. The investigators hypothesized that the addition of ACB and iPACK blocks to LIA will yield clinically important analgesic benefits compared to LIA alone in patients having total knee arthroplasty.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Nerve Block Neuromuscular Blockade Procedure: Local infiltration analgesia Procedure: Ultrasound-guided adductor canal block Not Applicable

Detailed Description:
LIA is the mainstay of postoperative analgesia in patients having knee arthroplasty. Performed by surgeons, LIA provides effective postoperative pain relief and reduces opioid requirements. Similar analgesic benefits have also been attributed to adductor canal and iPACK blocks, which partially block sensory innervation to the knee and its posterior capsule. Performed by anesthesiologist preoperatively, these blocks have also been incorporated into the care standard in numerous centers. However, it is not clear whether adding the adductor canal and iPACK blocks yields any incremental analgesic benefits. The investigators aimed to evaluate the benefits of adding adductor canal and iPACK blocks to LIA in patients having total knee arthroplasty.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 60 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description: Randomized, parallel group, triple blind (patient, assessor, anesthesiologist in the operating room)
Masking: Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: The Ideal Analgesic Technique for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Comparison Between Local Infiltration Analgesia Alone or Combined With Adductor Canal and iPACK Blocks
Estimated Study Start Date : July 2022
Estimated Primary Completion Date : July 2024
Estimated Study Completion Date : July 2024

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Local infiltration analgesia
Patients in this group will receive LIA intraoperatively, as per institutional standard. The injected solution will be comprised of 100cc Ropiv 2%, + Ketorolac 30 mg + Epinephrine 25 ug.
Procedure: Local infiltration analgesia
Procedure: Local infiltration analgesia performed by surgeons.

Active Comparator: Local infiltration analgesia + ACB-iPACK block

Patients in this group will receive LIA intraoperatively, as per institutional standard. The injected solution will be comprised of 100cc Ropiv 2%, + Ketorolac 30 mg + Epinephrine 25 ug.

Patients in this group will also receive preoperative nerve blocks under ultrasound guidance. These will include:

  1. Adductor canal block with 0.5% Ropivacaine w/epi 20 mL
  2. iPack block with 0.25% Ropivacaine w/epi 10 mL
Procedure: Local infiltration analgesia
Procedure: Local infiltration analgesia performed by surgeons.

Procedure: Ultrasound-guided adductor canal block
Procedure: Ultrasound-guided adductor canal and iPACK blocks performed by anesthesiologists preoperatively.
Other Name: iPACK block




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Postoperative pain at rest [ Time Frame: over the first 24 hours ]
    Area under the curve

  2. Quality of recovery (QoR-15) [ Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively ]

    Quality of Recovery (QR15) scores at 24 hours will be the second primary outcome.

    QR15 is a measurement of quality of recovery after surgery and anesthesia that has been psychometrically tested and validated. Reporting of outcome measures on a scale of 0 to 10 (0=None of the time and 10=All of the time). There are a total of 40 items/questions.



Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Mean opioid analgesic consumption [ Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively ]
    Postoperative cumulative oral morphine equivalent consumption during the first 24 hours

  2. Time to first analgesic request [ Time Frame: Up to 48 hours following surgery ]
  3. Pain Assessment (VAS) [ Time Frame: at 0, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours ]
    Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) - Pain:Overall pain assessed at rest and on movement A continuous scale comprised of a 100mm (10cm) horizontal line, anchored by 2 verbal descriptions No Pain to Worst Pain

  4. Risk of opioid-related side effects [ Time Frame: Up until one month following nerve block ]
    nausea, vomiting, pruritus, sedation

  5. Block-related complications [ Time Frame: Up until one month following nerve block ]
    vascular puncture, hematoma formation, intravascular injection, epidural anesthesia-bilateral sensory block

  6. Satisfaction with pain management [ Time Frame: at 24 hours ]
    A Patient Diary will be completed to assess overall satisfaction with analgesic technique 10 cm scale with "not satisfied at all" and "very satisfied" at either end



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 85 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ASA classification I-III
  2. BMI < 35 kg/m2
  3. Having elective unilateral total knee arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Bilateral knee surgery.
  2. Pre-existing neurological deficit or peripheral neuropathy in the lower the lower limbs
  3. Severe, poorly controlled cardiac conditions, significant arrhythmias, severe valvular heart diseases
  4. Severe, poorly controlled respiratory conditions (severe COPD, severe interstitial lung disease, severe / poorly controlled asthma)
  5. Contraindication to regional anesthesia (e.g. bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, sepsis, infection at the site of potential needle puncture on the posterior chest)
  6. Patient refusal
  7. Chronic pain disorder
  8. Chronic opioid use (≥30 mg oxycodone / day)
  9. Contraindication (or allergy) to a component of multi-modal analgesia protocol
  10. Allergy to amide local anesthetics used in nerve blocks
  11. Contraindications to spinal anesthesia
  12. Significant psychiatric disorder that would preclude objective study assessment
  13. Pregnancy
  14. Inability to provide informed consent

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04808947


Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Didem Bozak 416-323-6008 didem.bozak@wchospital.ca

Sponsors and Collaborators
Women's College Hospital
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Richard Brull, MD Women's College Hospital
Publications:
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Women's College Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04808947    
Other Study ID Numbers: LIA vs. LIA + ACB-iPACK block
First Posted: March 22, 2021    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: October 20, 2021
Last Verified: October 2021

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No