Individual Preoperative Planning for RSA
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04762667 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Recruiting
First Posted : February 21, 2021
Last Update Posted : February 21, 2021
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Degenerative diseases and traumatic injuries of the shoulder joint, lead to dysfunction of the arm. Arthroplasty has recently become an increasingly popular operation for severe damage to the shoulder joint. In clinical practice, the most effective operation today is the reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), after the installation of which the pain syndrome disappears in patients and a satisfactory range of motion in the shoulder joint resumes. With the increasing use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty and its expanding indications, surgeons today are facing tougher reconstructive challenges while still providing the patient with a good clinical outcome. The damaged joint presents a problem for the surgeon during component positioning. Implants must place the in a location and orientation that optimizes range of motion and stability while minimizing impingement. In order to address this, surgeons can look to the use of 3D imaging in order to better understand each patient's pathology.
All patients are performed computed tomography scans (CT) of the shoulder joint. Then, were reconstructed 3D model. To determine the position of the components is mounted a scapular plane was created based on 3 points on the 3D reconstructed scapula: center of the glenoid fossa, most medial point on the spinal border of the scapula, and most distal point on the inferior angle of the scapula. The investigators use a scapular plane for to determine the optimal angles of inclination of the reverse baseplate. Then the position and direction of the pilot pin is determined. The position of the fixing screws and their length are also calculated. A resection line is planned for the humerus.
Preoperative virtual templating can be used to translate the preoperative plan into the operating suite in the form of patient specific instrumentation (PSI) and intraoperative navigation. PSI to reference the local anatomy in order to place the guide pin in the desired location, version, and inclination based on the preoperative plan. After surgery, all patients undergo a CT scan of the shoulder joint. These data are compared with CT scan of patients operated on according to the standard method. The range of motion is also assessed and compared.
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Shoulder Osteoarthritis Proximal Humeral Fracture Avascular Necrosis of Humerus | Procedure: reverse shoulder arthroplasty | Not Applicable |
Show detailed description
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Estimated Enrollment : | 65 participants |
| Allocation: | Non-Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Masking: | None (Open Label) |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | Preoperative Planning for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Using Individual Planing Strategy |
| Actual Study Start Date : | September 1, 2019 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date : | May 31, 2021 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date : | August 31, 2021 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Patients will undergo reverse shoulder arthroplasty with patient-specific instrumentation.
The patients underwent preoperative planning. A 3D model was made based on CT. The optimal position of the components of the endoprosthesis has been calculated. patient-specific instrumentation were created for each scapula and humerus using 3D modeling software. Individual guides use during operation for exact position of the components of the endoprosthesis.
|
Procedure: reverse shoulder arthroplasty
In our work, all patients are performs MSCT of the shoulder joint. The construction of a 3D model is carried out using the obtained data. Taking into account the individual features of the bone structure of the shoulder joint, images of the pilot wire guides, fixing screws and a resection template for the humerus are created. Holes for fixing spokes for the planned structures are also calculated. Using a 3D printer, models of guides and a resection template are printed. During the reverse shoulder arthropalsty, instead of a standard guide, patient-specific instrumentation are used. In the early postoperative period, all patients are performs MSCT of the shoulder joint. The obtained data are compared with the results of MSCT of the shoulder joints of patients previously operated on using the standard technique. |
|
Patients will undergo conventional reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
This group of patients was examined according to the standard method, Rg and CT of the shoulder joint were performed. According to the study, the sizes of the endoprosthesis were selected. Installation of the components of the endoprosthesis during the operation was carried out using standard (included in the set) guides. Orientation was performed according to the anatomical landmarks of the glenoid and the neck of the humerus, without taking into account the individual characteristics of the bones.
|
Procedure: reverse shoulder arthroplasty
In our work, all patients are performs MSCT of the shoulder joint. The construction of a 3D model is carried out using the obtained data. Taking into account the individual features of the bone structure of the shoulder joint, images of the pilot wire guides, fixing screws and a resection template for the humerus are created. Holes for fixing spokes for the planned structures are also calculated. Using a 3D printer, models of guides and a resection template are printed. During the reverse shoulder arthropalsty, instead of a standard guide, patient-specific instrumentation are used. In the early postoperative period, all patients are performs MSCT of the shoulder joint. The obtained data are compared with the results of MSCT of the shoulder joints of patients previously operated on using the standard technique. |
- MSCT after RSA. [ Time Frame: up to 24 weeks ]postoperative MSCT data will be used for our endpoint in early postoperative period
- Functional outcomes are assessed according to the Constant-Murley Score [ Time Frame: 6 months. ]assessment of the general condition, functional status of a normal or damaged shoulder joint. It consists of a section for both objective and subjective assessment, subdivided into sub-items including pain (maximum 15 points), daily activity (maximum 20 points), range of motion (maximum 40 points) and limb strength (maximum 25 points). The higher the indicator, the correspondingly better the function (minimum 0, maximum 100).
- Functional outcomes are assessed according to the University of California, Los Angeles Shoulder Assessment [ Time Frame: 6 months. ]
The questionnaire includes scores for pain assessment (from 1 to 10) and function (from 1 to 10). Additionally, active anterior flexion is scored from 0 to 5 points, active flexion strength is 0-5 points, patient satisfaction is 0-5 points. Strength and range of motion are assessed by a doctor or physiotherapist, the rest of the parameters are assessed by the patient himself.
The highest score can reach 35 points, the result above 27 points is assessed as good / excellent (satisfactory), below 27 - poor (unsatisfactory)
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | Child, Adult, Older Adult |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Clinical diagnosis: multifragmental fracture of the humerus head; aseptic necrosis of the humerus head; arthrosis of the shoulder joint.
Must be have pain and limitation of movement of the shoulder joint.
Exclusion Criteria:
massive glenoid injury. Damage to the deltoid muscle.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04762667
| Contact: Aleksey V. Lychagin, Doctor of Science | 84955303354 | dr.lychagin@mail.ru | |
| Contact: Nikolay A. Sukharev | 89099967654 | baizil@inbox.ru |
| Russian Federation | |
| I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University) | Recruiting |
| Moscow, Russian Federation | |
| Contact: Nikolay A Sukharev +7 (909)9967654 baizil@inbox.ru | |
| Study Chair: | Nikolay A. Sukharev | university clinical hospital № 1I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University. Moscow, Russia |
| Responsible Party: | I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT04762667 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
180195 |
| First Posted: | February 21, 2021 Key Record Dates |
| Last Update Posted: | February 21, 2021 |
| Last Verified: | January 2021 |
| Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
| Plan to Share IPD: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
|
reverse shoulder arthroplasty patient-specific instrumentation preoperative planning |
|
Necrosis Humeral Fractures Shoulder Fractures Pathologic Processes |
Arm Injuries Wounds and Injuries Fractures, Bone Shoulder Injuries |

