Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Implementation of a Standardized Tracheostomy Education Discharge Protocol

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04741256
Recruitment Status : Not yet recruiting
First Posted : February 5, 2021
Last Update Posted : November 30, 2021
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to identify and establish a safe and effective tracheostomy teaching protocol for caregivers. Results of this study will help in the development of a discharge protocol that allows for caregiver confidence and activation in tracheostomy care for patients.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Head and Neck Cancer Behavioral: Education booklet & standardized discharge training Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

This is a 3-phase, prospective controlled cohort study .

The first "pre-implementation" phase will include assessment of healthcare utilization costs of tracheostomy patients currently and nursing perspective on current caregiver tracheostomy knowledge.

The second "protocol" phase will include assessment of the necessity, acceptability, feasibility, fidelity, safety and effectiveness of a standardized pathway and assessment of the caregiver's activation.

The third "post-implementation" phase will involve assessment of post-implementation tracheostomy-related healthcare utilization costs and nursing perspective on caregiver tracheostomy knowledge.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment : 75 participants
Allocation: N/A
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Official Title: Implementation of a Standardized Tracheostomy Education Discharge Protocol
Estimated Study Start Date : March 2022
Estimated Primary Completion Date : November 2022
Estimated Study Completion Date : December 2022

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Caregivers

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Tracheostomy discharge protocol

All head and neck cancer patients regardless of participation in the study will receive the standard of care: A copy of a tracheostomy education booklet and standardized discharge training for patients and their caregivers by nursing staff during their inpatient stay.

Research personnel will provide protocol training to the inpatient nurses who are to provide training to caregivers.

Pre-implementation phase: Eligible "patient" participants identified & healthcare utilization recorded. "Nursing staff" participants complete nursing survey to capture volume of tracheostomy-related questions received.

Protocol-phase: "Caregiver" participants will complete a survey prior to patient tracheostomy, on day of patient discharge, and one week following discharge

Post-implementation phase: "Nursing staff" participants will complete an additional survey similar to the one in the pre-implementation phase. EMR will be reviewed for implementation fidelity.

Behavioral: Education booklet & standardized discharge training
Tracheostomy education booklet and tracheostomy teaching performed by nurses during hospitalization as dictated by the booklet.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Patient-Caregiver Activation Survey scores [ Time Frame: At time of surgery, an average of 15 minutes ]
    Caregiver activation in managing their family members' tracheostomy after implementation of a standardized discharge program as measured by the Patient-Caregiver Activation Survey. This is a validated survey assessing caregiver consisting of 13 questions designed to determined confidence in taking care of their loved one. Scores range from 4 to 52, with higher score indicates higher degree of caregiver activation

  2. Patient-Caregiver Activation Survey scores [ Time Frame: At discharge (an average of 7 days after surgery), an average of 15 minutes ]
    Caregiver activation in managing their family members' tracheostomy after implementation of a standardized discharge program as measured by the Patient-Caregiver Activation Survey. This is a validated survey assessing caregiver consisting of 13 questions designed to determined confidence in taking care of their loved one. Scores range from 4 to 52, with higher score indicates higher degree of caregiver activation

  3. Patient-Caregiver Activation Survey scores [ Time Frame: At first follow-up (1 week after discharge), an average of 15 minutes ]
    Caregiver activation in managing their family members' tracheostomy after implementation of a standardized discharge program as measured by the Patient-Caregiver Activation Survey. This is a validated survey assessing caregiver consisting of 13 questions designed to determined confidence in taking care of their loved one. Scores range from 4 to 52, with higher score indicates higher degree of caregiver activation


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Feasibility Questionnaire scores [ Time Frame: At time of surgery, an average of 15 minutes ]
    The feasibility questionnaire evaluates the necessity, acceptability and feasibility of the of the implementation of a standardized discharge program. Questions are related to readiness and willingness to participate in tracheostomy care. It will assess feasibility in attending tracheostomy teaching sessions by nurses and their baseline comfort in tracheostomy care and their enthusiasm in learning tracheostomy care. Questionnaire consists of 12 questions, with scores ranging from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating higher feasibility of tracheostomy protocol implementation.

  2. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) short form scores [ Time Frame: At time of surgery, an average of 15 minutes ]
    Safety, as measured by the PROMIS scores - 7-item questionnaire that assess self-reported anxiety in the family caregiver. A higher score correlates with a higher level of anxiety. Scores range from 7 to 25, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of anxiety

  3. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) short form scores [ Time Frame: At discharge (an average of 7 days after surgery), an average of 15 minutes ]
    Safety, as measured by the PROMIS scores - 7-item questionnaire that assess self-reported anxiety in the family caregiver. A higher score correlates with a higher level of anxiety. A higher score correlates with a higher level of anxiety. Scores range from 7 to 25, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of anxiety

  4. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) short form scores [ Time Frame: At first follow-up (1 week after discharge), an average of 15 minutes ]
    Safety, as measured by the PROMIS scores - 7-item questionnaire that assess self-reported anxiety in the family caregiver. A higher score correlates with a higher level of anxiety. A higher score correlates with a higher level of anxiety. Scores range from 7 to 25, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of anxiety

  5. Preparedness Caregiver Scale (PCS) [ Time Frame: At discharge (an average of 7 days after surgery), an average of 15 minutes ]
    PCS scores - Response categories correspond to the level of preparedness. Scale consists of 9 questions, with scores ranging from 0 to 4 with high score indicating the more prepared the caregiver feels for caregiving.

  6. Preparedness Caregiver Scale (PCS) [ Time Frame: At first follow-up (1 week after discharge), an average of 15 minutes ]
    PCS scores - Response categories correspond to the level of preparedness. Scale consists of 9 questions, with scores ranging from 0 to 4 with high score indicating the more prepared the caregiver feels for caregiving.

  7. Tracheostomy Care Competency Assessment [ Time Frame: At discharge (an average of 7 days after surgery), an average of 15 minutes ]

    Effectiveness will be measured with the tracheostomy care competency assessment. This survey will be an individual's subjective assessment of his or her knowledge of tracheostomy care. A 5-point Likert scale will be used from 1 "strongly disagree" to 5 "strongly agree" and assess different aspects of tracheostomy care outlined during their tracheostomy teaching provided by nurses. This assessment includes 12 questions with scores ranging from from 12 to 60 with higher scores indicating higher competency.

    Results form pre-implementation to post-implementation will be compared using a paired t-test or McNemar tes


  8. Tracheostomy Care Competency Assessment [ Time Frame: At first follow-up (1 week after discharge), an average of 15 minutes ]

    Effectiveness will be measured with the tracheostomy care competency assessment. This survey will be an individual's subjective assessment of his or her knowledge of tracheostomy care. A 5-point Likert scale will be used from 1 "strongly disagree" to 5 "strongly agree" and assess different aspects of tracheostomy care outlined during their tracheostomy teaching provided by nurses. This assessment includes 12 questions with scores ranging from from 12 to 60 with higher scores indicating higher competency.

    Results form pre-implementation to post-implementation will be compared using a paired t-test or McNemar tes


  9. Average tracheostomy-related healthcare utilization costs [ Time Frame: Pre-implementation (up to 6 months prior to surgery) ]

    Effectiveness will be measured with the tracheostomy care competency assessment. This survey will be an individual's subjective assessment of his or her knowledge of tracheostomy care. A 5-point Likert scale will be used from 1 "strongly disagree" to 5 "strongly agree" and assess different aspects of tracheostomy care outlined during their tracheostomy teaching provided by nurses. This assessment includes 12 questions with scores ranging from from 12 to 60 with higher scores indicating higher competency.

    Results form pre-implementation to post-implementation will be compared using a paired t-test or McNemar tes


  10. Average tracheostomy-related healthcare utilization costs [ Time Frame: Post-implementation, 30 days after discharge ]
    Average pre and post-implementation tracheostomy-related healthcare utilization costs

  11. Nursing survey [ Time Frame: Pre-implementation (up to 6 months prior to surgery) ]

    Effectiveness will be measured with the Nursing Survey scores. This is an 11 question survey designed to capture the amount of phone calls nurses receive regarding tracheostomy related questions over the last 6 months.

    Results form pre-implementation to post-implementation will be compared using a paired t-test or McNemar tes


  12. Nursing survey [ Time Frame: Post-implementation, 30 days after discharge ]

    Effectiveness will be measured with the Nursing Survey scores. This is an 11 question survey designed to capture the amount of phone calls nurses receive regarding tracheostomy related questions over the last 6 months.

    Results form pre-implementation to post-implementation will be compared using a paired t-test or McNemar tes


  13. Number of emergency department visits, urgent care or outpatient appointments post-discharge [ Time Frame: Post-implementation, 30 days after discharge ]
    Number of emergency department visits, urgent care or outpatient appointments, relating to post-discharge assessment of feasibility and safety of intervention

  14. Average number of tracheostomy-related phone calls per week post-discharge [ Time Frame: Post-implementation, 30 days after discharge ]
    Post-discharge assessment of feasibility, as measured by average number of tracheostomy-related phone calls per week



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Patient participants:

  • Diagnosis of malignancy of the head and neck requiring reconstruction and temporary tracheostomy
  • No previous record of tracheostomy
  • Has an identified family caregiver who is willing to participate
  • Has the tracheostomy in place for at least 10 days after discharge

Caregiver participants:

  • Family member or friend, who is 18 years or older, of an adult patient described above
  • Identified by the patient as his/her primary caregiver who is providing daily assistance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not have a caregiver
  • Caregivers who are illiterate.
  • Caregivers with previous tracheostomy experience.
  • Patients who are decannulated from tracheostomy prior to discharge.
  • Patients discharged to a skilled nursing facility at the time of discharge.
  • Patients who are tolerating continuous tracheostomy capping at time of discharge

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04741256


Contacts
Layout table for location contacts
Contact: Rod Rezaee, MD 1-800-641-2422 CTUReferral@UHhospitals.org

Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, Ohio
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
Contact: Rod Rezaee, MD    800-641-2422    CTUReferral@UHhospitals.org   
Sub-Investigator: Nicole Fowler, MD         
Principal Investigator: Chelsea Hamill, MD         
Sub-Investigator: Susan Mazenec, PhD, RN         
Sub-Investigator: Lauren Sahagian, BSN         
Sub-Investigator: Kerry-Ann Walker, ARNP         
Sub-Investigator: Zachary Bennett, MD         
Sub-Investigator: Mark Frilling, MD         
Sub-Investigator: Benjamin Johnson, MD         
Sub-Investigator: Grant Muller, MD         
Sponsors and Collaborators
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Rod Rezaee, MD University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04741256    
Other Study ID Numbers: CASE4320
First Posted: February 5, 2021    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: November 30, 2021
Last Verified: November 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Yes
Plan Description: Insignia Health provides rights to the Patient-Caregiver survey. As part of the agreement for access to the survey, they request that at the conclusion of the study we share the entire de-identified dataset. These will not be published by them or shared with another party

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Keywords provided by Case Comprehensive Cancer Center:
Caregiver activation
Caregiver knowledge
Caregiver skills
Caregiver confidence
Tracheostomy
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Neoplasms by Site
Neoplasms